Channel
@Knowledgeable_investor
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
717subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001672422292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Knowledgeable_investor |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Knowledgeable_investor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 717 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 718 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 719 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 719 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 June 2026 β 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 120 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
53 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 9 | 17.0% | |
| π | 8 | 15.1% | |
| π | 7 | 13.2% | |
| π | 6 | 11.3% | |
| β‘ | 5 | 9.43% | |
| customΒ 5269460053651366623 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| π€ | 3 | 5.66% | |
| πΎ | 2 | 3.77% | |
| π | 2 | 3.77% | |
| π¦ | 2 | 3.77% | |
| π | 1 | 1.89% | |
| π | 1 | 1.89% | |
| π³ | 1 | 1.89% | |
| π | 1 | 1.89% | |
| π | 1 | 1.89% | |
| π₯ | 1 | 1.89% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. E taco fΓΉ... Ora sarΓ da vedere quanto durerΓ questa nuova euforia ritrovata. l'S&P 500 sta salendo di nuovo proprio verso il limite superiore del massiccio Cuneo Crescente dal 2020. La trendline che Γ¨ nel mio grafico da anni ormai, ad oggi ancora resistenza crescente dal picco di fine 2021 e 2022 Γ¨ proprio li sopra. Tra alti e bassi i target sono lassΓΉ, si segue. π» .
β€4β‘1πΎ1
. Il trend di fondo non Γ¨ rotto, ma il prezzo sta lavorando dentro una zona di equilibrio. FinchΓ© lβS&P 500 resta sopra il supporto intermedio, il setup Γ¨ piΓΉ da continuazione con pausa che da inversione: cioΓ¨ alternanza tra spinta e rientro, come un percorso che passa da una zona di caos a una zona di equilibrio senza arrivare subito al livello finale, almeno fino al prossimo Taco di Donald che potrebbe portare allβ¦
β€1π1
β£πππ’π₯π’ππ' ππ’ πππ«π―π’π³π’π¨, π«π’π¦ππ§π’ π¬ππ¦π©π«π ππ π π’π¨π«π§πππ¨.
β€1π€1
. Aggiornamento Sp500 . Buon weekend . β
β‘1π1customΒ 52694600536513666231
. Sp500 nel mentre. .
π1customΒ 52694600536513666231
. π§ OpenAI che annuncia βun incidente di sicurezza senza precedentiβ trovandosi costretto a rimandare il lancio di un nuovo GPT. Ragazzi, la prossima volta dite direttamente che avete aggiunto una nuova feature. . E siamo ancora all'inizio. . https://x.com/i/status/2079658951264920020 .
π₯1
. Allegato 1 .
. 2/2 . La frattura tra Equity e Debito Il dato critico Γ¨ la divergenza tra azionario e obbligazionario di alta qualitΓ . Mentre l'S&P 500 corre sospinto dall'euforia tecnologica, il credito fatica a tenere il passo. L'equity Γ¨ diventato un veicolo concentrato sulla spesa in IA. L'obbligazionario resta ancorato alla "vecchia economia" e interpreta l'eccesso di debito aziendale, finalizzato agli investimenti inβ¦
π4π€2π1
. L'illusione della quiete: il mercato come una molla in tensione. Siamo di fronte a un paradosso: la percezione di un mercato piatto maschera una turbolenza interna senza precedenti. Gli indici appaiono dormienti solo perchΓ© le correlazioni tra titoli sono ai minimi: le oscillazioni violente delle singole azioni si annullano a vicenda, creando un appiattimento artificiale. Γ il 2026, l'era del "market of stocksβ¦
πΎ1π1π 1
. No Ai detected .
. Le notizie cambiano ogni ora. I livelli tecnici molto meno. Rumore e struttura sono due cose diverse. Si segue... . π₯ .
β‘2β€2π1
. Benvenuto Warsh . gioco di sponda per sp500 . βοΈ .
π1π1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Knowledgeable_investor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ§π¨π°π₯πππ ππππ₯π π’π§π―ππ¬ππ¨π«β (@Knowledgeable_investor), 717 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Knowledgeable_investor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.