Channel
@KnowRobin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
110subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001309946638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KnowRobin |
| Description | Sharing stories about Robin, our beloved friend ♥️ By @Garcha |
| Created | 9 July 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KnowRobin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 110 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 111 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 9 July 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
133 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 51.1% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 12.8% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 6.02% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 6.02% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 6.02% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 4.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 3.76% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.01% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.01% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.752% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2019 to 6 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As Carla told me to move on, I have decided not to post about Robin anymore, I just wanted everyone to know who was Robin and I think I have shared enough. We will remember him as a great friend, may god give peace to his beautiful soul 🕊️
❤6👏1
Signed Bains
One thing I forgot to share 👇🏻 Robin made me an admin in all of his channels — not to help him manage them, but to promote my own channel (@TechnologyBoxs). He told me to forward posts from my channel to all of his channels daily, which would help me grow my audience. I never asked for this favour, but he was generous enough to offer it anyway. He also supported me by promoting my channel in various promotion lists…
👏3❤2
Signed Bains
Carla also deleted her account 1 year ago and I haven’t heard anything from her since then 😔
😢1😭1
Signed Bains
Posting regularly on all channels for the last 6 years, I’m tired
😱6👍3❤1🤗1
Signed Bains
And I thought he was joking around 😞
💔7
Signed Bains
Sep 15, 2017 was the last day I heard from Robin! We were discussing about promotion lists for our channels.
😢7❤1💔1
Signed Bains
Robin had alternative account named Angelina to forward posts from @ThinkPositiveWords to other chat groups 😂
❤4💘1🙏1
Signed Bains
A wise advice from the OG ~ “Don’t put your whole life building a telegram channel “
👍6
Signed Bains
Robin was 26yrs old in 2017 and he was doing his graduation in BBA but he was so pissed because I had already completed my graduation and I was only 20 at that time 😂
❤6🥰4🔥1
Signed Bains
So I made many Channels related to cars companies like Audi, Rolls Royce etc and Robin always shared them in his channels without any hesitation. He always told me to keep posting in channel, be more passionate and gave me links of groups which promote channels with same number of subscribers.
❤8
Signed Humble Tiger
⏳
🤔1
Signed Bains
Who was Robin? Robin was the original creator of all the channels you appreciate. Yes! @ThinkPositiveWords @RealRelationship @TheOpenUniversity @TechnologyBoxs all were created by him. I’m just keeping them alive. Who am I? Doesn’t matter. He was such a nicest person I came to know online. He was from Kabul, Afghanistan. Although he never told us his real name but his cousin told me that it was Agheel. In September,…
❤40👍8❤🔥5🥰4🔥3
Signed ₿ᴀɪɴs
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @KnowRobin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 960,445 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Robin's Army” (@KnowRobin), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KnowRobin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.