Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КНИЖНЫЙ SHOT ☕️

Channel

КНИЖНЫЙ SHOT ☕️

@KnizhnyiShot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

641subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003107512113
TypeChannel
Username@KnizhnyiShot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KnizhnyiShot

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6216416316 August 2026 — 622 subscribers7 August 2026 — 622 subscribers14 August 2026 — 621 subscribers28 August 2026 — 624 subscribers7 September 2026 — 628 subscribers14 September 2026 — 641 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 618–644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 18:41641+13
7 Sept 2026, 17:20628+4
28 Aug 2026, 18:24624+3
14 Aug 2026, 01:16621-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:30622no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:48622first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,103 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52444425133972932761,12636.3%
custom 524243048872283997899432.0%
custom 524488326294121003698331.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 18 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KnizhnyiShot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC45 views56 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Августовского 🤎 Пропустила обзорную среду, не хотелось портить ее своим душным обзором, поэтому побурчу сегодня, но совсем немного. Честно-честно. М. С. Битон «Рецепт убийства для настоящей лентяйки» После прочтения хотелось переписать название – «Рецепт убийства моего желания читать уютные детективы»… Не уверена, что эта информация нужна, но я почему-то зацепилась за нее – книга написана в 1992 году. Возможно, дл

custom 524444251339729327622custom 524243048872283997818custom 524488326294121003616

4 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC117 views153 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Августовского 🤎 Желаю вкусного чайно-кофейного вторника 🍫 Близится мой день рождения и очень хочется вас порадовать. Настало время объявить о РОЗЫГРЫШЕ, который я уже упоминала. Правила участия: 📎Написать небольшую историю, можно ограничиться 7-15 предложениями, можно больше. История должна быть о том, в какой книге/вымышленной вселенной вы бы хотели оказаться? Почему? Чем бы занялись? Может, хотели бы стать каким

custom 524444251339729327664custom 524243048872283997845custom 524488326294121003644

31 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC189 views130 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Без пяти минут август... 🤎 Тёплых выходных, дорогие 🤍

custom 524488326294121003649custom 524243048872283997843custom 524444251339729327638

30 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC243 views229 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Июльского 🤎 Увидела у Женечки пост про психотипы и расстройства у сказочных героев («Сказки на кушетке») и вспомнила, что недавно познакомилась с похожими историями, и тоже захотелось поделиться. «Ай да Пушкин» «НЕ сказочный рэд флаг» «Ох да Андерсен» Все это - небанальные культурологические разборы старых сказок, поиск скрытых смыслов на страницах всем известных историй и весьма приятное погружение в воспоминания

custom 524444251339729327687custom 524243048872283997876custom 524488326294121003666

29 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC182 views201 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Июльского 🤎 Питер Боланд «Ванильный убийца» Если нужно описать книгу одним предложением, я бы попробовала так: Это отличный летний cozy (уютный) детективчик 🍨 «Ванильный убийца» – это четвертая книга в серии про дам из благотворительного магазинчика «Собачкам нужен уютный дом». И она меня не разочаровала. Я получила почти все, что ожидала – летний Саутборн, знакомые персонажи, любительское расследование без намёк

custom 524444251339729327679custom 524488326294121003663custom 524243048872283997859

28 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC166 views195 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Июльского 🤎 Надеюсь, у вас был вкусный чайно-кофейный вторник 🍫 Я, честно говоря, только присела отдохнуть, весь день в какой-то беготне и делах... Но часть дел была приятной) Очень хочется поделиться новостями. Наконец у меня появилась бумажная книга Торина, выбрала «Лемони», пока наслаждаюсь оформлением❤️ И наконец добралась до своего любимого косметолога, вчера сделала базовую комбинированную чистку и пилинг B

custom 524444251339729327679custom 524243048872283997865custom 524488326294121003651

27 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC199 views231 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Июльского 🤎 Летом выходные вообще не отпускают) Хочется остановить это быстротекущее времечко и наслаждаться солнцем, летними верандами и приятными прогулками 📸 Запечатлила очередную сумочку, которую связал брат... Девочки, это тихая роскошь... Если кому-то нужно, то он связал около 15 штук на продажу, с удовольствием отправлю вам озоном по самой вкусной цене - 1100 (доставка включена, на сумочке будет обвес сердеч

custom 524243048872283997890custom 524488326294121003671custom 524444251339729327670

23 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC355 views163 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Июльского 🤎 Пока я продумываю условия масштабного августовского розыгрыша, делюсь с вами подарочком от Яночки 🎈 Обожаю её творческие конкурсы 🤍

custom 524444251339729327666custom 524243048872283997852custom 524488326294121003645

22 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC244 views187 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Июльского 🤎 Книги читаются, но обзоры почему-то пишутся медленно… И это не потому что мне нечего сказать или лень, а потому что хочется растворяться в моменте и наслаждаться летом. Желательно то на море, то в лесу… Вчера пропустила кофейный вторник, устроила себе перерыв от телефона и соцсетей, стало полегче. Но сегодня хочется немного поболтать о том, какой Арчи Гудвин красавчик и обаяшка…. Точнее познакомить вас

custom 524444251339729327675custom 524488326294121003662custom 524243048872283997850

20 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC252 views238 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Июльского 🤎 Очень хочу провести большой конкурс и сегодня предлагаю вам поделиться своими мыслями в комментариях 📕 Как я вижу конкурсное задание: написать мини-эссе (пара абзацев) на тему - образ какого литературного героя вы бы хотели на себя примерить, почему, чем бы занялись? Или, может, вы бы хотели создать нового для себя персонажа в уже существующей вселенной🤍 Можно также будет сделать нейроиллюстрации на эт

custom 524444251339729327695custom 524488326294121003677custom 524243048872283997866

16 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC362 views169 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Июльского 🤎 Хочу поделиться ссылочкой на свою запрещенную соцсеть, буду рада взаимным подпискам) Оставляйте свои странички в комментариях 📎 Правда, после последнего рилс не понимаю, людям нужны книги или всё-таки футбол))

custom 524488326294121003669custom 524243048872283997852custom 524444251339729327648

15 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC342 views235 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Июльского 🤎 Как и обещала) Владимир Торин «О носах и замках» Сразу скажу, чтобы описать мои эмоции от творчества Торина мало одного поста. Боюсь, даже если я буду месяц писать только о нем, этого будет недостаточно... И вот я вновь погрузилась в истории мрачного, странного и даже опасного города Габен. Не могла не погрузиться, ведь там меня дожидался Натаниэль Доу. Очаровательный доктор... Доктор с саквояжем тай

custom 524488326294121003691custom 524243048872283997875custom 524444251339729327669

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @KnizhnyiShot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTCFinal Results44 voters

Обзор

  1. Владимир Торин ❤️61%
  2. Рекс Стаут ❤️39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КНИЖНЫЙ SHOT ☕️” (@KnizhnyiShot), 641 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KnizhnyiShot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.