Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Knightly Australian

@KnightlyAustralian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

216subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003949953571
TypeChannel
Username@KnightlyAustralian
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KnightlyAustralian

Growth

215216215.56 Aug 2026, 23:03 — 215 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:32 — 215 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:25 — 216 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:037 Aug 2026, 07:25
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 215–216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:25216+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:32215no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:03215first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.9%
avg views ÷ 216 subscribers
Avg views / post
175
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,493
Reactions total166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5231.3%
💯3722.3%
🫡2515.1%
👍2012.0%
🔥137.83%
🤬84.82%
63.61%
🤔53.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MusicalBushrangerPhoto

In case it needs to be said, i fully endorse bullying retarded faggots on my Youtube Channel

🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC79 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @free_yan_zakharinVideo

The Original Gulag Update video that was taken down from my Instagram page due to nudity content(posters in the background) Watch my new Gulag Update from today on my Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbsoIjRSKie/?igsh=MTViczFweGdlYnEzMg==

👍6🫡4

6 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC86 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I wish Nathan Bull all the best in his case when September rolls around and that he can hopefully beat whatever the system throws at him.

🫡5💯1

6 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC88 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

You can just imprison people for shit that wasn't even illegal at the time of it being done now. This needs to be rammed down people's throats; the government, it's courts and the system in general have been so blinded by its rabid devotion to Jewish overlordship that it continues to stab itself over trivial things. To reiterate. Michael Nelson got thrown into Prison for a crime that wasn't Illegal at the time of i

💯8🫡2

6 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NathanBullUncensored

My case has been adjourned until September 9th to give time for legal aid to get back to my lawyer on whether they’ll fund them for the case or not

🫡3

6 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NathanBullUncensored

Michael Nelson just got sentenced to 21 days prison, he is not appealing and will serve the time to my knowledge

🫡4

6 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC60 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NathanBullUncensored

FREE MICKLE

🫡4

5 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC37 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NathanBullUncensored

Myself and my 4th cousin Michael Nelson (@michaelnelsonx) are set to be sentenced tomorrow at 2pm to 2 months or maybe even 4 months for Michael and 2 months for when we wore ‘6 million? that’s a bit much, mate.’ t-shirts and performed Roman Salutes. We will of course both be appealing the magistrate’s egregious personal decision, whether the appeal is accepted or not, is another thing. If you do not hear from both o

🔥7🫡1

3 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheAustralianVanguard

New X Article - White Australia Party High Court Challenge: An Overview of the Arguments This article is an explanation and a summation of all the legal documents filed so far, which outline the White Australia Party's three separate constitutional arguments, and the Commonwealth's attempted replies and defences to each argument. The article explains in simple terms what each argument is, and why there is historica

🫡2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 05:32 UTC254 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Academics are saying this is a popular opinion, but obviously i can't comment on that nor agree with such a statement

💯18👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KnightlyAustralian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 432,961 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Knightly Australian” (@KnightlyAustralian), 216 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KnightlyAustralian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.