Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТРЕМИР |18+| Адени Сова

@KnigaTremira

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

375subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002088675188
TypeChannel
Username@KnigaTremira
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KnigaTremira

Growth

37510 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 375 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:11 — 375 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:3110 Aug 2026, 18:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 374–376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:11375no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:31375first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 375 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held16 (16 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,612
Reactions total567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

602 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 522918854620351049610817.9%
❤‍🔥9816.3%
9215.3%
custom 52021475437770481348614.3%
😁569.30%
custom 5228785751285587401518.47%
🎉447.31%
😍172.82%
🔥132.16%
👍111.83%
101.66%
🤓71.16%
🦄30.498%
💘20.332%
🥰20.332%
💅10.166%
🤩10.166%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC33 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мои два дебила (два ГГ в Злоде) уже шесть глав как разделились и все никак не встретятся. Сама я терпеть не могу такое, ахахха. Особенно, когда герой еще и один остается и что-то там делает или, не дай бог, думает. Да, у меня такой есть. Правда, с ним котенок - это лучше, чем совсем один, потому что котик спасет любую скукоту. Надо срочно их объединить уже обратно, чтобы вместе решали свои дурацкие проблемы (помири

custom 52287857512855874016custom 52021475437770481345❤‍🔥2custom 522918854620351049621

5 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC77 views37 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Решила в этом месяце считать не только количество написанных слов, но и количество удаленных. Хоть узнаю, чего больше 😂 Кажется, это мой единственный четко сформулированный план на август. Перечитала линию прошлого в Злоде. Вроде ничо так вышло. Но читатели опять будут страдать с выдуманными именами и титулами да побольше, чем в БиПЧКе. Но зато без ъ. Вот такие (не)новости. А вас пугают выдуманные имена в книгах?

❤‍🔥1513👍5custom 52021475437770481342custom 52291885462035104962

3 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC90 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ох уж эти богические опечатки😂 Кстати, у этого персонажа правда есть собака, примерно вот такая⬆️ Но не в этой сцене. А этой сцене у него СПИНА! Вы когда-нибудь встречали тибетского мастифа? Я нет. Наверное, он больше меня. И щенки у них как телята размером. Погладили бы такого? #опечатка #злод #клов

😁15❤‍🔥9custom 520214754377704813484👍3🦄2

1 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC100 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#фотымесяца в июле в основном роса на цветочках и иголочках, но еще паучок. Простите, мои арахнофобы! #итоги 😸 Впервые в жизни погладила лысого кота. Такой теплый и бархатистый ✍ Приняла корректуру БиПЧКа и накатала аннотацию ко 2 тому. А то у меня ее даже не было 👻 Закончила 3-ю часть Злода и начала 4-ю 💻 Написала дикое для себя количество слов (38 250) и знаков (235 605). Такого, наверное, со времен Алькирии н

custom 52291885462035104961110custom 522878575128558740110❤‍🔥5custom 52021475437770481343😍2🦄1

31 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC100 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Thirsty от Lucy Lehane BL о вампире и журналисте, дающем советы по отношениям с представителями потустороннего мира, которые не так давно камаутнулись в мире реальном. Не восторг, но в целом читабельно + письма, которые приходят в колонку этого журналиста, смешные. Поле Смерти от Ли Чайлда ЮТ в последнее время постоянно рекил мне советы по писательству от Ли Чайлда, который весь такой бестселлинговый, все дела. И я

17custom 522918854620351049612custom 520214754377704813410❤‍🔥4💅1😍1custom 52287857512855874011

31 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC80 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В июле со мной случился не только писательский, но и читательский марафон. 9 книг для меня это прямо очень много, и только две из них я слушала, а не читала. Прям даже горжусь собой. #буктрекер

🔥139custom 52291885462035104966❤‍🔥3custom 52021475437770481341

29 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC91 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

К вопросу о вдохновении. Вчера гуляли по ебеням и нашли историческое место, вдохновившее меня на кличку года от Лъо: Она (Таала) с подозрением спросила: – И, по-твоему, это один из них? Почему я никогда не слышала эту историю? Сколько дворцов она построила? — На какой из вопросов мне отвечать, мушка моя навозная? — На все! Лъо картинно закатил глаза, но ответил: — Да, опарыш мой ненаглядный, это один из них. Вроде

😁17❤‍🔥105custom 52021475437770481344👍1🤩1

24 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC133 views47 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Две новости (почти новые) 👻 Я вчера дописала третью часть Злода и начала последнюю, четвертую. Йеее! 👥 Уже несколько дней - потому что я склерозница и забыла вам сказать - как вышел (опять) Двуликий Ао на Ваттпаде. Больше его нигде не положить. Но если у вас работает ВП, читайте, комментируйте, ставьте звезды и вот это все✨ P.S. Если вы не поняли, при чем тут картинка, то это Злод и его котенок Рахель. Рахель не

🎉15custom 522918854620351049614❤‍🔥12custom 520214754377704813431👍1🥰1

23 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC140 views40 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В минуты отчаяния она ищет прибежища в лесах прошлого. Они становятся ее личным Архивом, а сама она – Архивариусом, и со временем она убеждается, что единственный способ не рассматривать мир как историю утрат – это рассматривать его как историю перемен. Неожиданно понравился "Северный лес"🥹 Теперь ничего не хочется читать. У вас такое бывает? #жизаписателя #цитата #книги

13custom 522878575128558740111custom 520214754377704813410❤‍🔥4💘1custom 52291885462035104961

22 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC136 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Лада тут книжечки разыгрывает. Условия творческие✍

11custom 520214754377704813410custom 52291885462035104968

22 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC121 views48 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

утро фоткать жучка в росе и все #жизаписателя #фото

custom 522918854620351049618😍14custom 5228785751285587401103custom 52021475437770481342🥰1

21 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC110 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Такое стремно писать, потому что всегда кажется, будто если похвастаться избытком радостей, радости резко закончатся. Но я рискну. Радость 1 Эллен написала офигенский отзыв на БиПЧК, такой прям структурированный и положительный. Я вчера перед сном его нашла и ыыы🫠 Радость 2 Злод пишется активнейшим образом. Вчера написала 3860 слов и сама обалдела от такой прыти. Подхожу к концу 3 части, посыпаю героев тоннами стек

custom 522918854620351049617❤‍🔥14102custom 52021475437770481342🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @KnigaTremira. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 673,974 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТРЕМИР |18+| Адени Сова” (@KnigaTremira), 375 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KnigaTremira.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.