Channel
@KitKatcos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002295628257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KitKatcos |
| Description | @mlenopla начинающий косплеер из бгд в основном щитпосты. фоточки,процессы крафтов,жизнь во время мероприятий |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KitKatcos |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 28 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (21 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 616 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5226624266044206998 | 8 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5451730442694701289 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5343911812783939477 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5433662378568852997 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5269262201687922307 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5433975747972705038 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.94% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
апргейд перчатки рэйндоттир🤩 я ее полупрозрачность ненавидела всей душой, так еще и короткая, а не на всю руку берусь потихоньку за возобновление пошива райдэн и исправление рэйндоттир
custom 54517304426947012891
Oh okay,you're saying i can kill the girl I didn't realize that But maybe i could play with her hair first. Just for a little while The doors here open inward They only open one way Ragnarok...🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎 🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎 🌟 ph 🌟 #Доллкосплеит
🍓1
✦❍◯⃝ 𝑁𝑜𝑛, 𝑙𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑎𝑠. ㅤㅤㅤ𝑆𝑒𝑢𝑙 𝑢𝑛 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑢 𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑟𝑎. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝐶'𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑖𝑟𝑒 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑒, 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝑒𝑡 𝑎𝑚è𝑟𝑒 ◯⃝ ❍✦ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ˚₊‧꒰ა ☆ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚ ✦Буду рада рт и реакциям!!! #косплей✦ ⋆ ࣪⊹ ⤿ @Sanyanyacosp
custom 54336623785688529972custom 52692622016879223071
#косплан 🌟
🤯5custom 54336623785688529971
шок кошмар сенсация второй пост и целая примерка дома ЗА НЕДЕЛЮ я что заболела а вообще я разочарована: у меня в щепки разлетелся штатив с кольцом, пришлось телефон ставить куда поставится, поэтому даже не сняла ничего нормального, кроме липсингов с одной руки и кривых фоток с одним и тем же освещением в шакальном качестве🌟 я возлагала много надежд на сегодняшний контент, а по итогу придется пытаться чинить штатив и…
custom 54517304426947012892
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 💿💿💿 💿💿💿 💿💿💿 Это моё имя… ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Райдэн Босэммори Мэй. 💿💿💿
custom 52266242660442069988custom 54339757479727050382💯1custom 53439118127839394771
сигночки! я фоток столько не делала, пришлось две повторюшки сделать😭
🔥5custom 53439118127839394772custom 52692622016879223071custom 54517304426947012891
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @KitKatcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 547,829 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“киткат мафиозник” (@KitKatcos), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KitKatcos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.