5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 450–461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 02:36
460
+9
21 Aug 2026, 14:48
451
-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:57
452
-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:01
453
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:14
453
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 460 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
18 (12 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
187
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5447293440830241806
75
41.0%
custom 5271682355629662426
50
27.3%
custom 5447520966722729685
18
9.84%
custom 5402449618573205508
17
9.29%
⚡
15
8.20%
custom 5458382591121964689
6
3.28%
custom 5280792835962984192
2
1.09%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KiselevaBiz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Китайские ИИшки наступают на пятки американским. И для России это хорошая новость.
Главная китайская новинка июля - нейросеть Kimi K3. Она умеет создавать сайты, писать код, работать с изображениями и видео, анализировать большие объёмы информации и выполнять сложные задачи.
Но главное преимущество китайских нейросетей - цена. Они не бесплатные, но пользоваться ими дешевле, чем многими американскими.
Как китайцам …
Вы работаете - контент привлекает клиентов
Недавно к нам обратился предприниматель, который занимается строительством фасадов зданий. Он очень точно сформулировал проблему, с которой сегодня сталкиваются многие специалисты и владельцы бизнеса:
«Я хорошо делаю свою работу, но я не блогер. Я не знаю, как правильно вести социальные сети, постоянно придумывать темы, писать посты и снимать ролики. И у меня просто нет на…
Подкаст🎙- о внутренней опоре.
О том, почему нас так цепляет чужое мнение. Почему хочется нравиться, быть замеченной и получать подтверждение своей ценности. О страхе оказаться «маленькой» среди более опытных и масштабных людей.
И ещё - о моём пути. От мастера маникюра до руководителя своей небольшой IT-команды. О желании расти, создавать рабочие места, собирать сильных людей рядом и однажды построить большую компан…
Зачем мне клуб предпринимателей?
Я поняла одну важную вещь: каждому человеку, который хочет расти, нужны свои люди. Свое окружение.
Люди, рядом с которыми ты начинаешь мыслить шире, принимать более смелые решения и двигаться быстрее. Где можно получить не только поддержку, но и честную обратную связь.
Для предпринимателя это особенно важно. Сейчас непростое время. Когда работаешь один, очень легко застрять в своих…
Год назад я сказала вслух, что хочу работать с крупными компаниями, а не только с экспертами.
Как именно - понятия не имела. Не было ни стратегии, ни плана. Была только мысль: «Хочу выйти на другой уровень».
Прошло примерно полгода - и что-то начало меняться.
Сначала меня пригласили обучать команды крупной компании внедрять ИИ-инструменты в реальные рабочие процессы. Потом совершенно неожиданно пришёл запрос на ра…
Я больше не буду обучать людей нейросетям.
Не потому, что тема перестала быть актуальной. Наоборот, нейросети развиваются с такой скоростью, что классическое обучение просто не успевает за ними.
Пока записывается один курс, уже меняется интерфейс, появляются новые функции и выходят более сильные модели. Один ChatGPT за последний год вырос невероятно. Плюс появились достойные китайские нейросети. Нужно пробовать и в…
Кажется, нам пора познакомиться заново.
Многие из вас пришли сюда, когда я рассказывала о нейросетях и учила создавать AI-сотрудников.
Но за последнее время я стала гораздо больше, чем просто специалистом по AI и обучению.
Меня зовут Анастасия Киселёва, основатель KISELEVA AI LAB.
Вместе с командой мы создаём сайты и интернет-магазины, разрабатываем AI-сотрудников, подключаем CRM, телефонию и собираем всё это в е…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @KiselevaBiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KISELEVA AI LAB | От идеи до системы” (@KiselevaBiz), 460 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KiselevaBiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
