Channel
@KinoFalsafa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
268subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002237642254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KinoFalsafa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KinoFalsafa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 268 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 266 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 267 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 272 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 272 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
392 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 91 | 23.2% | |
| ❤ | 73 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 63 | 16.1% | |
| 🏆 | 38 | 9.69% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 9.18% | |
| 💯 | 31 | 7.91% | |
| 💔 | 26 | 6.63% | |
| 💊 | 23 | 5.87% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 2.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 392reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2024 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KinoFalsafa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 October 2024 to 26 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ушбу постда фильм мазмуни очиб берилган (спойлерлар бор). Сюжет мажоз ва рамз устига қурилган. Жон Коффи — инглизчада бош ҳарфлари J.C. Бу Исо Масиҳга (Jesus Christ) ишора. Бош қаҳрамон Исо сингари ер юзига инсониятга нажот бериш учун тушган, лекин инсонларнинг адолатсизлиги, нонкўрлиги, шафқатсизлиги ва тизимнинг айби билан ўлдирилади. Инсоният ўз қутқарувчисини ўлдиради. Жон Коффининг ўлим олдидан айтган сўзлари фи…
✍11
Реал қаҳрамон Десмонд Досс. Фильм воқеаларидаги деталлар ва реал фактларни текшириб кўрдим. Ўзи фильм воқеалари чўпчак эмаслиги ҳақида икки оғиз: бутун взвод (урушдаги сафдошлари) Досснинг қаҳрамонлиги ҳақида гувоҳлик берган, Окинавадаги айрим японлар ҳам кундаликларида қайд этган бир қуролсиз телба санитар ярадорларни ташиб юргани ҳақида. АҚШнинг энг нуфузли "Шон-шуҳрат" медали берилиши учун анча жиддий талаблар бо…
❤13
Агар ҳаётингиз сизни қониқтирмаса, бошқаникини ўғирлайсизми? Эронлик режиссёр Аббас Киаростамининг шоҳ асари "Close-Up" фильми реал ҳаёт билан кино ўртасидаги чегарани парчалаб ташлаши билан ўзига хос. Фильм ҳужжатли, бадиий ва мета-кинематографик жанрларни қоришмаси. Яъни, фильмдаги воқеалар реал ҳаётда содир бўлган. Барча воқеликлар, аксарият актёрлар (жумладан, бош қаҳрамон Ҳусайн Сабзийон ҳам) ҳақиқатда мавжуд б…
🔥19
#iqtibos Одамлар тушунмайди. Ёлғизлик аслида етарлича қадрланмайдиган туйғу. ©500 days of summer 🎬 @KinoFalsafa
💯31
#stars David Lynch Amerikalik rejissyor,ssenarist,prodyusser,montajchi,rassom. 3 karra Oscar nomzodi. 1946-yil 20-yanvarda Montana shtatida tugʻilgan. 2025-yil 16-yanvar 78 yoshida Los-Anjelesda vafot etdi. Otasi — Donald Lynch (qishloq xo‘jaligi departamenti xodimi), onasi — Edwina Lynch (o‘qituvchi). 4 farzandi bor. 2009-yildan rafiqasi Emily Stofle. 🎬 Debyut ishi: "Eraserhead" (1977). Mashhur filmlari: "The E…
❤21
Ҳаётни кўриш — биринчи азоб Фалсафани визуал санъатга айлантирган буюк режиссёр Терренс Малик ушбу фильмида америкалик оддий оила ҳикоясида ҳаётни кўрсатади. Сюжет мураккаб эмас — уч болали стандарт оила. Ўғил боланинг вояга етиш, атрофини ўрганиш жараёни ва ота-онанинг бунда муносабати, тарбия ва таъсири ҳақида ҳиссиёт ва ички монологларга асосланиб олинган бу фильм Терренс ижодининг энг кўзга кўринган дурдонаси. Ф…
❤🔥18
#iqtibos Севмоқ — азоб чекиш демакдир. Азобдан қутулиш учун севмаслик керак. Аммо севмасликнинг ўзи ҳам азоб. ©Love and death 🎬 @KinoFalsafa
❤🔥24
Avstriyalik rejissyor Michael Hanekening debyuti(to'liq metrajli)hayotning finalini ko'rsatib beryapti. Umuman insoniyat tafakkuri hosilasining. Nimadan boshlashni uzoq o'ylab film syujetini yozishga qaror qildim. Spoiler bo'ladi! Avstriyalik oilaning oddiy hayot tarzi ko'rsatiladi(+real voqealarga asoslangan)Er-xotin Jorj va Anna,qizi Eva hikoyasi. Jorj muhandis,Anna optikada ishlaydi,qizi maktabga qatnaydi. Bir qar…
❤🔥13
Sokinlik ortidagi abadiyat Hayot sokin. Sukunat ichra sevgi,sukunat ichra og'riq. Bir qarashda hech narsa sodir bo'lmayotgandek tuyuladi,biroq har bir lahza - o'tkinchi. Har bir nigoh - sokin faryod. Yasujiro Ozuning "Tokyo Story" filmi shovqinsiz kuchli hayqiriq,vaqt insonni ne ahvolga solishini eslatadigan kuchli haqiqat. Aslida film juda oddiy,sodda hikoyaga ega: keksa ota-onalar bolalarinikiga mehmonga borishadi…
👍16
Kinematografiya cho‘qqisi yoxud insoniylikning so‘nggi manzili. Kino tarixida shunday filmlar borki, ular tomoshabinni shunchaki ko‘ngilochar hikoya bilan zavqlantirmasdan, haqiqiy hayotga, falsafaga, insoniy tuyg‘ular va dunyoqarashlar inqiroziga sho‘ng‘itadi,mulohazaga chorlaydi. Lawrence of Arabia – ana shunday filmlardan biri. Bu shunchaki epik tarixiy film emas. Bu – kinematografiyaning abadiyatga o‘yilgan hay…
❤20
#iqtibos U sening yuragingni sindiradi, bu fakt. Lekin baribir uni izlaysan. Sevgi ajoyib, shunday emasmi? ©Great Expectations 🎬 @KinoFalsafa
💔26
#fakt Lalita Pavar Bollivud aktrisasi faoliyati 70 yil davom etgan. 700 dan ortiq filmlarda suratga tushgan va bu dunyodagi eng uzoq kino karyerasi bo‘yicha rekordchiga aylantiradi uni. P/s: Hind film ko'radiganlar bo‘lsa uni qaysi mashhur filmda ko'rganini yozib ketishi mumkin... 🎬 @KinoFalsafa
👍20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KinoFalsafa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 561,041 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KinoFalsafa” (@KinoFalsafa), 268 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KinoFalsafa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.