Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KINGZ CALLS

Channel

KINGZ CALLS

@Kingzcalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

15subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678138271
TypeChannel
Username@Kingzcalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 23 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kingzcalls

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

151615.57 August 2026 — 16 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16 subscribers30 September 2026 — 15 subscribers7 August 202630 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 54 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 17:2115-1
11 Aug 2026, 21:0116no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:4616first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥583.3%
👍116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2022 to 8 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 May 2022, 14:54 UTC204 viewsread 11 August 2026

Sorry guys but imma have a break for several days, really busy and got some personal problem, after that gonna choose giveaway winner

26 May 2022, 01:10 UTC141 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Jeetmoon Dev of babycheems,crowcoin,oneinu Apescale: 🟢 Could be 🔵 Not launched yet https://t.me/JeetMoonBSC Ps: im apeing 0.1 with challenge wallet

25 May 2022, 17:18 UTC105 viewsread 11 August 2026

Im gonna be very busy for the next few days, expect a fewer post from me after that gonna randompick GA winner

25 May 2022, 17:14 UTC97 viewsread 11 August 2026

Carefull guys this is community token this and with this hype gotta be pump and dump fast, take profit asap

25 May 2022, 16:46 UTC102 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Keep an eye on @FactionBSC . Launching today. Apescale: 🟢 Its gonna launching soon, have presale, wait for dip if u slow buyer. Probably this gonna be pump and dump like Binerr,carefull Telegram: https://t.me/FactionBSC Website: https://faction.ninja/

25 May 2022, 16:43 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Sorry guys i,ve been busy today solving my personal problem, so no calls

👍1

24 May 2022, 18:15 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

The fuck this guys are stupid they can get more with that 😂 only $1M for that 😂 $1M is big but compare to the project capabilities (bullshit dream) they can got more 😂

🔥2

24 May 2022, 18:12 UTC74 viewsread 11 August 2026

Here guys im give u a save one,i know alot of u already heard bout this Echelon This gonna be very very slowmoon i guess Apescale: 🟢 https://t.me/echelonchain This has a live blockchain, and u can create ur own token there, its safe, personally i already profit 30x++ on this in ath. But now sitting around 1mcap Tbh this very very undervalue, this one should be around hundred millions or even billion, not that m…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kingzcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KINGZ CALLS” (@Kingzcalls), 15 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kingzcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.