Channel
@Khat_o_Rang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
156subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092591211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Khat_o_Rang |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Khat_o_Rang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 156 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 155 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 155 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 92.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما مردم ، در طول سالهای زیاد و با روش های مختلف ، تلاش کردیم جنگ نشود و ایران را از افتادن به باتلاق فلاکت نجات دهیم و به اینجا نرسیم . آنهایی که در کوس جنگ دمیده اند مقصر تمام اتفاقات این روز ها هستند .
Signed S.Samadi
پاسخ من : با درود و ارادت سپاس از توجه شما . بحث بر سر نقش میانجی ها در ایجاد زیبایی و استواری و تعادل در خط نستعلیق است . در خط نستعلیق میانجی ها نقش بسیار پر رنگ و حتا مهم تری نسبت به تعداد زیادی از حروف کلاسیک در ایجاد دور ، انحنا ، مسیر حرکت و رانش قلم برای تعادل و زیبایی در اسکلت بندی این خط دارند . در خطوط شش گانه ( ثلث استثنا دارد اما نه به گستردگی خط نستعلیق ) میانجی ها فقط نقش واسطه های افقی دارند و در ا…
❤2
Signed S.Samadi
نظر یکی از خوشنویسان : درود عالی بود . اما من فکر میکنم واسطه های خط نسخ صاف و افقی هستند در خط نستعلیق همان واسطه ها تبدیل به قوس میشن . حتی در کلمه میکند هم (ند) تنها با نون شروع میشه اما در کلمه میکند خروجی ک میانجی یا واسطه محسوب میشه در خط نسخ هم همانیست که در نستعلیق وجود داره . منظور اینه که هیچ خطی بدون میانجی قابل نوشتن نیست وازین حیث تمامی خطها از یک قاعده برخوردارند . .نکته اینکه تمامی واسطه های ک…
Signed S.Samadi
نقش بنیادین میانجی در شکل گیری استخوان بندی ، زیبایی و ایستایی خط نستعلیق بخش چهارم https://t.me/Khat_o_Rang
❤1
Signed S.Samadi
نقش بنیادین میانجی در شکل گیری استخوان بندی ، زیبایی و ایستایی خط نستعلیق بخش سوم https://t.me/Khat_o_Rang
❤1
Signed S.Samadi
🌴 کشاورزی نزد همسایهاش رفت تا از او طنابی بگیرد و الاغش را جلوی خانه ببندد. همسایه پاسخ داد: «طنابی ندارم، اما یک پیشنهاد به تو میدهم. دور گردن الاغت همان حرکتهایی را انجام بده که انگار داری طناب را میبندی؛ فقط وانمود کن که او را بستهای، آن وقت از جایش تکان نخواهد خورد.» کشاورز به توصیه همسایه عمل کرد و صبح روز بعد دید که الاغ دقیقاً همانجا ایستاده است. کشاورز دستی بر سر الاغ کشید و خواست او را به مزرعه ببر…
❤3
Signed S.Samadi
خط هنری متعلق به زبان ، جغرافیا ، مرام و مسلکی نیست . تفاوت اصلی خط نستعلیق و خطوط شش گانه https://t.me/Khat_o_Rang
❤1
Signed S.Samadi
پژوهشی در تاثیر بنیادین میانجی ها و مفاصل برای شکل گیری خط نستعلیق و نقش معلم . شما بعنوان هنرجوی خوشنویسی می خواهید بدانید قلم چگونه حرکت می کند تا این شکل بوجود می آید ؟ https://t.me/Khat_o_Rang
❤1
Signed S.Samadi
بررسی نقش میانجی ها در خطوط رایج در جهان بخش اول https://t.me/Khat_o_Rang
❤1
Signed S.Samadi
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed S.Samadi
نقش بنیادین میانجی در شکل گیری استخوان بندی ، زیبایی و ایستایی خط نستعلیق
❤1
Signed S.Samadi
😢
Signed S.Samadi
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Khat_o_Rang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 791,063 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خط و رنگ ( khat va rang)” (@Khat_o_Rang), 156 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Khat_o_Rang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.