Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

(РЕСТ) .. ♡゙𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐊𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢ㅤׂㅤ ✧

@KetlinsiPort

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003818981966
TypeChannel
Username@KetlinsiPort
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KetlinsiPort

Growth

132133132.58 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 132 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:31 — 132 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:52 — 133 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:319 Aug 2026, 00:52
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:52133+1
9 Aug 2026, 00:31132no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:31132first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.9%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
32.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,940
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

142 reactions across 4 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52109850402839875922416.9%
custom 53167589951789088621611.3%
custom 62984878879607419311611.3%
custom 53167557782484068451510.6%
custom 6296137020431407151128.45%
custom 5262911319446679513117.75%
custom 6298390370728286843117.75%
custom 521119878362644034453.52%
custom 531430042704966231353.52%
custom 542247171243013294853.52%
custom 629654673454164199153.52%
custom 629655824075903073753.52%
custom 527842602981001943142.82%
custom 542252726783210380742.82%
custom 542280218009878556642.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC5 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @BloomoraHelpInfoVideo

Давно искали человека, который сделает вам видео/баннер за кротчайший срок и дешёвую оплату??? ,𓈒ᮬࣦ 𓏵⃜ ׄ🌟🌟🌟 ׅ⃨֟ ݂݃ 、ִ︶࣪︶‌‌Კ𓏸⃘⊹ׅ Bℓִꪮ‌ִꪮ‌ִຕִׄ𐐼‌ׄꭉυᩛׄ Тᧉ‌ᨢִᧉ‌ 𐓣ִꪮ‌ִຕִׄꪮ‌ִжᧉ‌ƚ࣪! ‿ ‌ ֪֪֪ ݁ ⑅ ຼ 🎀┊ ˚︵◞ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩- прекрасный 🤩🤩🤩 ꩁ⃪݄፝ ‌፝֟⁞゚⃟выбор из𖹭ܳ‌⃪⃜ ׁ Мห‌۫‌ꪮ‌ִжᧉ‌ᧃׄƚ࣪ϐ᷼𐐼‌ׄ ᧁ‌𝆬ρ︩ׄυᩛִટִׄບ‌ꪎִ! 🌟В нашем канале мы можем вам предоставить такие услуги как... 🤩 VIDEO. 🎁 🤩 AVATARS/BANNERS. 🥂 🤩 EMOJI. ☁️

8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC14 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️🔹риветствую. Я начинающий дизайнер, Меркилл. 🎁 - вы ищите приятное оформление за хорошую цену? Вам ко мне! ᅠ𐑺‌ֺ‌ ִ‌ᤳ. ࣪😎 ۫𓈒ִ ⎯ִ͟͟⎯ִ ⸼࣪ ִ 💎 ࿚ུ࿚ུ ׄ ׄ В этой сфере я меньше года, занимаюсь оформлением постов, монтажу. 😁😘 Буду благодарен за подписку. ➿Рад видеть вас на канале и показывать свое творчество.

8 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ִㅤㅤ ㅤ ׄᅠㅤ𝖯𝖨𝖠𝖱 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍ㅤㅤ ִㅤㅤ 🥥 — Хотите дизайнера , который делает хорошие баннеры / авы? Или хотите следить за развитием канала? 𓏵 𝖸𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗇 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗐𝖺𝗒~ ㅤㅤㅤㅤnavigation : info

custom 52111987836264403441

7 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC37 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ищу вп, писать в коментарии или лс #репост

4 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC102 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ухожу пока в рест, возможно буду в заморозке, так как вторая смена, и не смогу вести канал, 10 класс😀, кто хочет разрыв, пишите в лс

custom 52109850402839875927custom 52629113194466795136custom 52111987836264403444

30 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC159 views63 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ𓎟𓎟 🎁 ֵ ︎︎ ︎︎ ꪀׁׅᧉ᩠֗ᨰׁׅᨰׁׅ p̷ᨵ𝕤ȶ ! ︎︎ ︎︎ ֵ ֵ ͝ 🎁 ׄ 🎀 ȶ𝐢𝕞ᧉ᩠֗ : ??? p̷𝘳𝐢ɕִׄ˖ᧉ᩠֗ : 55 ☆ 𝘳ᧉ᩠֗𝜐𝐢ᧉ᩠֗ᨰׁׅᨰׁׅ 🎀𝐢ꪀׁׅ𝙛ᨵ ✨✨ Fᨵ𝘳 ɕִׄ˖ᨵꪀׁׅȶᥲɕִׄ˖ȶ ✨✨ ✨✨ ȶᥲꬶִ࠭𝕤 : #order #banner ✨✨

custom 521098504028398759217custom 531675899517890886216custom 531675577824840684515custom 52629113194466795135custom 53143004270496623135custom 54224717124301329485

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KetlinsiPort. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 443,233 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(РЕСТ) .. ♡゙𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐊𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢ㅤׂㅤ ✧” (@KetlinsiPort), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KetlinsiPort.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.