Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Всё о крипте и форексе с Керей

@Kerya_Forex_Kripta

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

5,623subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144338504
TypeChannel
Username@Kerya_Forex_Kripta
Description*Публикуемый контент в канале не является финансовой рекомендацией. Это лишь мои сделки и мой взгляд на рынок.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kerya_Forex_Kripta

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@OriginalTradeSignals/18072 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC@Kerya_Forex_Kripta/7794 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC1.0044 minutes
@OriginalTradeSignals/18082 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC@Kerya_Forex_Kripta/7795 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC1.0029 minutes
@OriginalTradeSignals/18093 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC@Kerya_Forex_Kripta/7796 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC1.0025 minutes
@OriginalTradeSignals/18113 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC@Kerya_Forex_Kripta/7798 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC1.002 minutes
@OriginalTradeSignals/18175 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC@Kerya_Forex_Kripta/7804 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC1.008 minutes
@OriginalTradeSignals/18206 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC@Kerya_Forex_Kripta/7808 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC1.0062 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@OriginalTradeSignals17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0025 minutes@OriginalTradeSignals (170)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @OriginalTradeSignals. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,6235,6345,628.57 August 2026 — 5,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,631 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,623 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,621–5,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:245,623-8
7 Aug 2026, 23:225,631-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:015,634no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:585,634first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.11%
avg views ÷ 5,623 subscribers
Avg views / post
288
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held35 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,063
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,520
Videos
272
Links
2,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC131 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#JTO Протестировали поддержку по 0.5$ Монета отработала мой сценарий с коррекцией и снизилась на 30%, протестировав уровень на отметке 0.5$, но пока что смогла его удержать. Однако, это временное явление, локальный отскок к скользящей MA200 мало что меняет, реализовать ее пробой в таких рыночных условиях попросту не получится. Мы уже отскочили от нее, возможно сделаем еще один ретест и полетим дальше в шорт. После

11 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC212 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#WLD Полетел дальше Актив отработал мой сценарий и сходил в область 0.3$ на ретест данной поддержки, каждый из вас мог забрать эту шорт позицию, о ее потенциале я озвучивал в прошлом обзоре. Я думаю, что данную отметку мы вряд ли преодолеем быстро, поэтому в краткосрочной перспективе ожидаю консолидацию выше нее. А текущий локальный рост не приведет к чему - то серьезному, так как вряд ли получится реализовать про

11 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC240 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#BTC Актив снова ушел в шорт Область 65.000$ мы не смогли удержать, так как прошло давление в продажу и цена снова ушла под скользящую MA200. Если мы в ближайшее время уйдем под облако, то нас ожидает очередной ретест поддержки по 62.000$. Пока что ситуация продолжает оставаться неоднозначной. Хотелось бы увидеть снятие ликвидности сверху, но актив все никак не может определится с последующим движением и выйти из

10 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC258 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#COTI Постепенно уходит в коррекцию Как и ожидалось продолжение роста мы не увидели, монета постепенно начала реализовать коррекционную динамику. Сейчас у нас происходит вторая попытка пробоя области 0.011330$ и я думаю, что она в этот раз будет удачной, так как торговые объемы сильно просели. В конечном итоге мы полностью откатим весь рост, это лишь вопрос времени. Для любителей риска можно рассмотреть шорт позиц

10 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC270 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#XAUUSD Технический и фундаментальный обзор. Золото наконец дало нормальный импульс после нескольких месяцев коррекции. От области $3 972 цена выросла примерно к $4 340, вернулась выше уровня $4 194 и вышла над дневным облаком Ишимоку. RSI уже около 65, но до полноценной перекупленности рынок пока не дошёл. Технически локальная структура стала бычьей. Пока золото удерживается выше области $4 195-4 240, для меня при

10 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC231 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#ARC Открыл шорт Монета показала импульсный рост, что является обычной рыночной манипуляцией, которую мы откатим довольно скоро. Уже происходят активные попытки ухода ниже скользящей MA200 и в ближайшее время я рассчитываю на полноценный ее пробой. Цели: 0.06146$ - 0.05493$ - 0.05145$ Стоп: 0.07039$

10 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC257 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#BTC Актив снова по 65.000$ По биткоину наблюдается восходящая динамика и повторная попытка удержания выше 65.000$, динамика выглядит положительной, поэтому вполне возможно что сейчас мы пойдем к отметке в 67.000$. Пока что давления в продажу не наблюдается, а цена смогла закрепиться выше облака + скользящей, главное сохранить текущую динамику. Посмотрим, что будет после открытия фонды и там уже сделаем следующие

9 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC275 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#RUNE Актив подрос за месяц на 47% Монета не так давно обновила минимум февраля этого года, но после этого начала показывать постепенную восходящую динамику, которая привела актив в область 0.45$. Но проблема здесь, как и по многим альтам в отсутствии торговых объемах, что сильно уменьшает шансы на продолжение роста. Вероятнее всего полноценного ухода выше 0.45$ мы не увидим и в лучшем случае стоит ожидать боковик

9 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC259 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#RENDER Потеряли поддержку по 1.5$ Монета показала небольшую консолидацию на данной отметкой, но по итогу реализовала полноценный ее пробой, что в целом не удивительно с такой низкой активностью покупателя. Ситуация негативная и в ближайшее время нас вероятнее всего ждет обновление лоя на отметке 1.25$, а там уже будет не далеко и до минимума по 1.2$. Данный сценарий считаю наиболее логичным, так как предпосылок н

9 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC272 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#FARTCOIN Падаем дальше? Актив недавно показал небольшой рост, но удержать область 0.17$ у нас не получилось и мы начали откатываться обратно, тем самым просели на 30%. Текущая обстановка выглядит довольно слабой и в лучшем случае я бы рассчитывал увидеть здесь консолидацию в область 0.12$ - 0.14$, но точно не еще одну волну роста. Также допускаю, что мы продолжим коррекционную динамику, так как активность покупат

8 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC287 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#ETH Что там с активом? В момент прошлого обзора монета боролась за область 2.000$ и по итогу шла ниже нее, сходив практически в область 1.500$, однако, сейчас мы постепенно возвращаемся обратно. По сути динамика у нас по - прежнему завязана на биткоине, поэтому в ближайшее время каких - то сильных движений по эфиру я не ожидаю, логичным выгляди боковик 1.800$ - 2.000$. Но ETH все также остается довольно сильным и

8 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC282 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#DYDX Откатили рост июня В июне монета показала неплохую динамику и сходила на ретест сопротивления в области 0.2$, однако, преодолеть его не получилось, ввиду слабости покупателя. Сейчас мы имеем полный откат данного движения и постепенное поджатие к поддержке на отметке 0.1$, ретест которой я ожидаю увидеть в ближайшее время. Торговые объемы у нас находятся на крайне низких значениях, а ситуация на рынке по - пр

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Kerya_Forex_Kripta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Всё о крипте и форексе с Керей” (@Kerya_Forex_Kripta), 5,623 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kerya_Forex_Kripta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.