Channel
@KeplerCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
146subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001770735789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KeplerCalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 July 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KeplerCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 146 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 147 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 149 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 149 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 19 | 26.8% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 25.4% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 18.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 18.3% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2022 to 11 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hi guys this is a bit of long shot but if anyone is still here who lost funds on the outbreak project that was done a long while back send me a dm just want to check some numbers then will go from there can not guarantee full amounts yet ( if you did not lose funds on it and you claim to have done you will be blocked instantly )
👍3👏1
Video, posted without a caption
🎉2
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2
Bullish said this back in January " next BTC halving is 2024 so feel like 2023 can be a great accumulation year might even see a lot of recovery later in the year " and this is pretty much only just early stages of Q4 🔮💹
🔥7
also made this group private now so if i do come back and do something only people reading this now will be majority who knows i am tired of seeing these trash farming devs honestlyy
👏4🔥2
Ignore the noise follow your intuition patience is a virtue to win in crypto lets be real crypto has been around for like 10 years yeah not just gonna be wiped out like nothing wealth is made in bear markets and times like this some people are making big deal over one country when what most likely happens is that another country simply embraces it instead and the next bull can be lead by a whole other nation crypto i…
Global crypto cap is back above $1 trillion yeah 🚀 🙏
🎉5
When is a good time for a token to launch I am just wondering of course no right or wrong just opinion yeah
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
And back in 2021/2022 I remember someone telling me I helped them become a millionaire in there currency that feeling is something else hope to be able do something like this again with based people who knows what the future holds hopefully good times are coming soon would be awesome one day 🙏
👍3👏1😱1
Just wanna drop a quick message been asked by a few about launches personally I don't think its the best time for launches unless you are happy with a 100K/200K topper of course there is a few tokens doing close to 1M and some above but its a lot harder and not something that happens with all launches not saying it does not happen just saying its more rare currently and the other thing is how many of those that hit 1…
👏2👍1
⚠️ Being told someone is impersonating me to launch a token just noticed now I AM NOT LAUNCHING ANYTHING AND HAVE NOT LAUNCHED ANYTHING AND NOT PLANNING TO LAUNCH ANYTHING DO NOT FALL FOR IT THANKS GUYS PLEASE BE CAREFUL AS IT IS NOT ME OKAY GUYS ⚠️
👍6🤯1
Happy new year to everyone! not been so active for various reasons but 2022 been a wild year hopefully 2023 is a banger not financial advice but just need to survive this bearish market and can feel those good times returning :) next BTC halving is 2024 so feel like 2023 can be a great accumulation year might even see a lot of recovery later in the year just need to get past these months hard to say how the market wi…
👏2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KeplerCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
When is a good time for a token to launch I am just wondering of course no right or wrong just opinion yeah
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2022 to 11 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Keplers Calls” (@KeplerCalls), 146 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KeplerCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.