Channel
@KeagansChannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001851400444 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KeagansChannel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KeagansChannel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 30 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 29 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 27 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
在这种你真诚给个建议，就有人能立马扣顶“嘉豪”帽子，然后把你喷得体无完肤的环境里…… 真的，少说话，保平安。 我本身是重度的 B 站用户，但我在小红书发评论的频率硬生生比在 B 站高出不少。为啥？不就是因为那边风气差得让人窒息吗？ 结果就这阵子，小红书的风气也拉胯得一塌糊涂。照这个趋势发展下去，这地方真快变成微博一样的的绝世大厕所了。 算了，我不跟这儿耗了，我还是去 Threads 吧。那边的环境客观地讲，真比这儿好上不知多少倍。^_^
据说Motorola明年会发布搭载Graphone OS的手机？有点意思。 不知道大家怎么评价
🤯1
家人们，燕麦要多吃。拉出来的答辩确实不一样，跟香蕉似的🤣
推特真的是没救了，评论区里的傻逼人机能不能去死啊？ 刷到有意思的推文本来想着急头白脸看一眼评论区大家怎样怎样讨论的。 一打开全是 “比我骚的没我好看”…
国区数码社区审美：无限趋近的劣化版 iOS，神秘无衬线且字重不一的字库缺损字体
谷歌 Pixel 6 和 Pixel 6 Pro 两款手机将在今年 10 月份结束更新支持，Android 17 QPR1 正式版将会今年 8 月或 9 月份发布。目前 Andoid 17 QPR2 Beta1 已发布，目前只有 Pixel 6 和 Pixel 6 Pro 是收不到 Android 17 QPR2 Beta 版推送。但 Pixel 6a 仍在支持周期内。
😢2
前几天拼多多买了个卡包 还挺好用的
这玩意我上架在闲鱼 竟然tm封了七天 有需要的可以私我 免费送了
营销号简直就是追逐流量的狗。成百上千个机器人矩阵号，每天蹲着看有没有有点流量的消息，投放测试，一旦有某条推文意外获得流量，成千上万的矩阵号就开始做排列组合式的诽谤诬陷。 直到某个组合的消息点燃了网友G点，百万营销号大军开始跟进。你转我我转你，转到最后想查都查不清楚最开始是谁先干的。每个在互联网上叫得出名字的人，都有机会吃这个套餐。 如果还没轮到你，只能说明你人气还不够高，是个糊比。
欢迎加入杰克大王粉丝群：🛰️+jacktechstudio，不定期会发红包，群里都是数码爱好者，讨论质量很高（杠就是你对），最近讨论 AI 和 vibe coding 居多。
某些国人总有办法把事情搞毁，自己撑伞了就把别人的伞全撕毁了。前段时间Claude封禁大量中国账号貌似就是因为国内某些大厂蒸馏数据。（当然也少不了 Dario的日常攻击） 这群人真的贱得要死。
GiffGaff 大量封号 大量囤卡的贩子你自求多福吧 再难的话也想出来了但是没发出来。实体卡不邮寄中国是你们的杰作，现在封号又是你们的杰作，大家就是老老实实想换国外卡收验证码的人 卡号贩子真是一群蛀虫 一群藤壶
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KeagansChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Keagan’s Channel” (@KeagansChannel), 30 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KeagansChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.