Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فلسفیدن

Channel

فلسفیدن

@Kazemmoutabian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

124subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216181045
TypeChannel
Username@Kazemmoutabian
Descriptionهدف این کانال یاد گرفتن فلسفیدن است نه فلسفه . @leanthinker2
Created27 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Kazemmoutabian

Growth

1246 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:47124no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:04124first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 124 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.8
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 December 20256 August 2026)
Views total110
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
22
Links
302

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 41s
Average length
7m 51s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1578.9%
👍421.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026

سلام همه می دانند که کانال های من کانال تبلیغاتی نیست. پس کنی درباره لینک فوق توضیح می دهم. حسین کاویانی ارز دوستان دوران جوانی من است. ما تقریبا تا سال ها در کنار هم بودیم و یک مسیر فکری را دنبال می کردیم و از سال شصت به بعد رآه ما جدا شد. و تا سال هشتاد و هشت تقریبا از او بی خبر بودم تا آنکه او مرا پیدا کرد و دوستی ما به اشکالی دوباره آغاز شد. آن زمان بود که دانستم او دکترای روانشناسی گرفته است و در زمینه روانشناس

6 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrHossrinKaviani

https://t.me/DrHossrinKaviani این لینک کانال، کانال رسمی فارسیِ دکتر حسین کاویانی، نویسندهٔ ایرانی، است و با هدف انتشار گزیده‌ای از نوشته‌ها، تجربه‌ها، دیدگاه‌ها و دیگر آثار فرهنگی و علمی ایشان راه‌اندازی شده است. همچنین مطالب و موضوعات دیگری که با رویکرد و محتوای این کانال هم‌خوانی داشته باشند، در اینجا منتشر خواهند شد. نسخهٔ انگلیسی این کانال نیز به‌صورت موازی راه‌اندازی شده و اکنون از طریق نشانی زیر در دسترس است:

1

5 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

کارل پوپر؛ فیلسوف ضد یقین از نظر پوپر «تردید» حالتی به مراتب دموکراتیک‌تر از «یقین» است؛ چراکه تردید باب مشورت را باز می‌کند. کسی که به درستیِ نظراتش یقین دارد، خودش را بی‌نیاز از مشاوره و اظهارنظر دیگران می‌داند. اما تردید باعث می‌شود اولا معتقد باشیم به «دیگران» نیاز داریم، ثانیا آزادی اظهارنظر و نقادی را نیز برای دیگران به رسمیت بشناسیم. عصر ایران؛ ماهو منفرد - کارل پوپر جمله‌ای داشت که شاید خلاصه تمام فلسفه سیاس

1

5 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

این نگاه پوپر به «آینده»، تفاوت او را با فیلسوفی مثل فرانسیس فوکویاما نشان می‌دهد. فوکویاما اگرچه فیلسوفی لیبرال محسوب می‌شود، ولی متاثر از هگل بر این باور است که تاریخ مسیر مشخصی دارد. او این اندیشۀ بنیادین را، که درستی‌اش نیز قابل اثبات نیست، از هگل اقتباس کرده و این ادعای لیبرالیستی را بر اندیشۀ هگل مبتنی کرده است که آیندۀ تاریخ بشر چیزی جز لیبرال‌دموکراسی نیست. قاعدتا پوپر اگر زنده بود با چنین ادعایی مخالفت می‌کر

1

5 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026

متن زیر بانی ساده با تکیه بر مهم ترین بخش نظرات پودر است . عحالتا آن را فقط به است ام می گذارم. 👇👇👇

2 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mylastpoemsVoice message

خوانش شعر بر جای مانده

1

1 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC14 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mylastpoemsPhoto

بر جای مانده دور می شد دور و جای پاهایش بر جای مانده بود در کوره راه برف و گم می شد آن دورها در مه و من ایستاده بودم و می لرزیدم و یخ زده بودم و خشکم زده بود و خشکیده بودم انکار آنجا و نگاه می کردم او را که دور می شد دور در کوره راه برف و گم می شد آن دورها در مه، و جای پاهایش، که بر جای ماند ه بود.‌ کاظم موتابیان https://t.me/mylastpoems

👍2

28 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mylastpoemsPhoto

واپسین دعوتنامه شاعر بیا دوباره برویم، برویم دیلمان ، برویم کوه ابر آن بالا آن بالا بالاها و دریای ابرهای سپید سپید مخملی در زیر پاهایمان و خورشید در خون نشسته شفق ، پیشارویمان و تو که بی خود می شوی سرمست می شوی غرق می شوی در آن وسعت بیکران، در بیکرانکی آن وسعت ، و شادی لبخندی شیرین روی لب هایت که در عسل چشمهایت باز می تابد و شنگول ملوس دختر بچه زیبای درونت فوران می کند، ظهور می کند باز. و تو در بی خودی فریاد می کن

2

25 Jun 2026, 06:56 UTC53 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

A bridge back to YOURSELF #traviseliot #shaolinonline #shorts.mp4

25 Jun 2026, 06:56 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026

نظریه بدنمند بودن گام های نخستین مراقبه و رشد معنوی به اختصار در سخنان استاد شب هنگ لی.

19 Jun 2026, 20:01 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

شادی بی سبب تحلیل فوق از نظر جامعه شناسی و روانشناسی اجتماعی، تحلیل و تبیینی دقیق از واکنش های جامعه و بیش از هر چیزی بیان یک تجربه زیسته است‌ با اینهمه اگر با گاستون باشلار موافق باشیم که علم در جستجوی امر خفی است، به گمانم آن پرسش مقدر ، پرسشی که پرسیدنی است این باشد: چرا روح جمعی ایرانی، شاد بودن را فراموش کرده است، شاد بودن در همه حال، در جنگ و صلح؟ پاسخ این پرسش را می توان به دست تحلیل های تاریخی سپرد اما مشکل

👍2

19 Jun 2026, 18:41 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

صلحی که غریب است ! مینا نژادستاری در منطق سیاست و رسانه، صلح باید خبر خوبی باشد؛ پایان یک وضعیت فرساینده، کاهش تنش، و شروع دوره‌ای قابل پیش‌بینی‌تر. اما در واقعیت اجتماعی، ماجرا همیشه این‌قدر ساده نیست. گاهی صلح نه با آرامش، بلکه با تردید، بی‌اعتمادی و حتی دلخوری روبه‌رو می‌شود. و همین‌جاست که یک تناقض ظاهری شکل می‌گیرد: چرا چیزی که باید «خوب» باشد، همیشه خوب تجربه نمی‌شود؟ پاسخ را باید جایی بیرون از خودِ صلح جست‌وج

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kazemmoutabian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 426,867 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فلسفیدن” (@Kazemmoutabian), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kazemmoutabian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.