Channel
@Kavosh_FreeDiscussion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002482231689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kavosh_FreeDiscussion |
| Description | Somewhere to have a chat with your friends, but in English! |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 9 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kavosh_FreeDiscussion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 111 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 111 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
52 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 96.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2024 to 26 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧪Kavosh Scientific Group Free Discussion 📎 Hobbies ❓️How do hobbies shape a person’s identity beyond their academic or professional role? ❔️Can a hobby lose its value once it becomes monetized or competitive? ❓️What does someone’s choice of hobby reveal about their way of coping with stress? ❔️Is it better to pursue one hobby deeply or explore many superficially? ❓️How do cultural and socioeconomic factors influence…
❤6
Reminder: the session is today, 4 to 5:30 pm
The session was postponed to saturday(4-5:30) due to the lack of participants. Hope to see you then!!!
❤2👎1
🧪Kavosh Scientific Group Free Discussion: Session Eight 📎 Art ❓Can anything be considered art? Where do you draw the line? ❔Can art be separated from the artist? Should it be? ❓How has art evolved over the centuries? ❔Has a piece of art ever changed the way you think about something? ❓What’s more important in art, technical skill or emotional impact? ⌚️Monday, 5 to 6:30 pm 📍Chemistry department, 3rd floor, Aquariu…
🧪Kavosh Scientific Group Free Discussion: Session Seven 📎 Technology ❓What are the advantages and disadvantages of technology in today's society? ❔How has technology changed the way you communicate with friends and family? ❓How do you balance the benefits and drawbacks of technology in your daily life? ❔What is the most useful mobile app you have on your device, and why? How has technology influenced your learning …
👍1
The sessions are kicking back off! See you on Saturday at 4pm, same place :)
Due to the circumstances there won't be a session today. May he rest in peace.
#تسلیت جناب آقای دکتر جمالی، با قلبی آکنده از اندوه از طرف تمامی دانشجویان، درگذشت فرزند گرامیتان را تسلیت عرض میکنیم. این مصیبت جانکاه، ما را نیز در غمی عمیق فرو برده است. از خداوند مهربان میخواهیم که به ایشان و خانواده محترمشان صبر و آرامش عطا کند و روح پاک فرزندشان را در آغوش رحمت خود قرار دهد. در این لحظات دشوار، بدانید که همگی در کنارتان هستیم و از خداوند منان برایتان صبری عظیم خواستاریم. 🆔 @kavoshsut
🧪Kavosh Scientific Group Free Discussion: Session Seven 📎 Technology ❓What are the advantages and disadvantages of technology in today's society? ❔How has technology changed the way you communicate with friends and family? ❓How do you balance the benefits and drawbacks of technology in your daily life? ❔What is the most useful mobile app you have on your device, and why? How has technology influenced your learning …
❤2
Per request of a number of our regular participants we won't have a session due to the midterms. Good luck and see you next week!
❤8
We talked about music and what it meant to us, and introduced eachother to new bands and genres! Thanks to everyone who attended!
❤3
For feedbacks and suggestions feel free to message us directly or indirectly.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kavosh_FreeDiscussion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,250,590 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kavosh Free Discussion” (@Kavosh_FreeDiscussion), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kavosh_FreeDiscussion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.