2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 04:00
60
no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:47
60
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
126.7%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
20 (17 February 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
152
Reactions total
32
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Links
57
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
444 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5220188841666691803
119
26.8%
custom 5260558673800868254
64
14.4%
custom 5262868584522079146
56
12.6%
❤
51
11.5%
custom 5467385684387982306
38
8.56%
💋
34
7.66%
custom 5287328745395334469
24
5.41%
✍
18
4.05%
❤🔥
14
3.15%
🔥
14
3.15%
🙏
4
0.901%
custom 5274023997569264770
3
0.676%
🥰
3
0.676%
🏆
1
0.225%
💔
1
0.225%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
305
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kaveh_TFDream. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❌— ✨ак только вы решили отдохнуть славным вечерком и уже выдохнули, прикидывая, чем можно заняться из-за спины к вам подбегает незнакомец . . . 🌟🌟
🤩❌Кавех испуганно смотрит то на студента, помпезно одетого даже по меркам Сумеру и проговаривающего данный текст, то на его помощника с блокнотом в руках. Архитектора поймали в самый «удачный» момент, когда он шёл в кафе забирать свой заказ.
🌟🌟 — ✨епортаж новостей от ка…
❌❌❌
💠👒👒🌟4.07. 🌱
❌👒👒🌱
❌👒
❌❌А сделаю ли я когда-нибудь проект лучше,
❌❌чем Алькасар-сарай?🤩🤩
❌❌❌❌🤩🤩🤩
Иногда вера в себя теряется, а хватка становится слабее. Это ведь 😈 нормально 🫁 для людей творческих специальностей: без сомнений не будет и результатов. Но иногда эта тонкая грань стирается, оставляя тебя с ужасно долгим чувством неудовлетворённости. Перед собой, перед другими. ❌✴️
❌Довольно печально - жечь себя ради…
🌟🌟❌Кавех слышит от вас поздравления и расплывается в улыбке.
🌟🌟🌟
Наконец-то с пылью в доме покончено, а книги красиво рассортированы по одному только для Кавеха (или аль-Хайтама) известному расположению. Вас пригласили быстро оценить порядок, лишний раз подчеркнув важность момента «до» и «после».
❌...Кажется, у людей время от времени появляются мимолётные увлечения. Они быстро проходят, поэтому специально записывать…
🖤🖤
🌟 Сегодня очень важный день! 🌟🌟
❌Пока вы идёте в сторону дома именинника, мысленно составляете небольшое поздравление, чтобы было приятнее вручить подарок архитектору. Уже столько времени прошло с того момента, как вы впервые увиделись — подумать только... И год пролетел достаточно быстро. В прошлом году этот день был наполнен суматохой, и вам интересно: а поменяется ли что-то в этот раз?
🌟🌟
❌И вот вы осторожно с…
🍂❌Вы только недавно вернулись в Сумеру...
❌❌❌📒📒📒
🍂🍂🍂
❌Прошло достаточно времени с момента, как вы уехали, но заставила вас вернуться трагичная весть о событиях, связанная с этим городом.
И ведь правда, сейчас вы видите всё собственными глазами: все знакомые улицы в трещинах, листвы стало будто бы меньше. Свои дома некоторые жители хлипко заделали чем было под рукой,
а мимо пробегает 🐰🐰🐰🐰
ваш давний друг,
чуть ли не р…
❌...Ох, я так заработался, что забыл обсудить с тобой парочку новостей. В последние дни меня одолевает... некая тревога, и очень уж не хочу нагнетать настрой на ночь глядя, но... к-хм, э-э... вы общались с Дори? Нет? А, про Тигнари и аль-Хайтама я помню, не волнуйся!
❌Да, я согласен с ними: отдых крайне важен. Ты же не сможешь всю жизнь бежать как белка в колесе, ха-ха. Важно давать себе отдыхать своевременно и не р…
🌟 Через время Кавех отходит от порта, снова раскрывая письмо.
🌺🌺
🌺👒👒👒🌟
💠
❌❌Господин Кавех!
❌Жители Сумеру очень любезно провели для меня экскурсию по городу и рассказали об истории многих построек. Я до сих пор нахожусь под впечатлением и осмелюсь заявить, что ваши творения останутся известными до конца времён!
❌Также я хотела бы попросить вашего содействия в разработке одного строительного проекта, который живёт в…
— А моня поиграться с твоими волосами? Там позаплетать их в «пальмочки», косички и прочие...
❌Кавеха резко вырывают от мыслей. Он загадочно смотрит на того, кто же ему задал этот вопрос. Ах, вот они и встретились вновь, только на сей раз в порту. Архитектор сидел у самого причала, разбирал весь вчерашний тяжёлый день, потраченный на Академию, так ещё и это утро, держа в руках одно письмо. Говоря о нём...
🤩Нет.🤩
❌🌟🌟
…
🌟Дождь пошёл сегодня крайне резко, отчего вы не успели взять с собой даже зонтик. Благо, что в Сумеру можно спрятаться под любую лестницу или навес, и, как удачно вышло, вы юркнули именно под крышу дома аль-Хайтама. Вдруг вы слышите возгласы со стороны окна про... еду?
Любопытство само собой взяло верх, и вы решили подойти чуть поближе, послушать, о чём теперь ссорятся ваши друзья.
...Я всё ещё ПОВЕРИТЬ НЕ МОГУ что …
🍂❌Сегодня вы держите путь через пустыню... Вас позвали в деревню Аару сыграть в Священный Призыв Семерых, и вы не смогли бы отказать даже при всём желании. Махаматра иногда бывает слишком убедителен, поэтому теперь вы тратите один из своих выходных дней на преодоление бесконечных барханов.
Практически приблизившись к месту назначения, вы видите ещё одного своего знакомого. Решив поздороваться и подойдя ближе, вы уже…
— Спешит он поздравить, ну конечно. Я бы на твоём месте не стал так кичиться рациональностью в пространстве! — теперь Кавех демонстративно обращается уже к вам. — Ему-то легко говорить так, ведь это же я купил то неудобное кресло пару месяцев назад, никто другой... — архитектор досадно рыкает на последнем слове, упоминая аль-Хайтама так, словно это не он сидит прямо напротив него. Бесстрашие и отвага, не иначе.
🌟Вы н…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kaveh_TFDream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 347,148 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Kaveh_TFDream named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@chiory_tfd named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒦𝒶𝓋𝑒𝒽 🌿 ₊⊹” (@Kaveh_TFDream), 60 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaveh_TFDream.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
