Channel
@KatseyeeProject
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003334153601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KatseyeeProject |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KatseyeeProject |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 8 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 8 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (10 June 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 89 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 32.2% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 15.6% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 14.4% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 8.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KatseyeeProject. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ㅤㅤㅤ Trace the shadowed path and claim your missing profile, hidden deep inside the classified archives. 𝘍𝘐𝘌𝘓𝘋 𝘋𝘖𝘊𝘜𝘔𝘌𝘕𝘛𝘈𝘛𝘐𝘖𝘕 (𝘗𝘕𝘎) Where the investigation softly awaits your presence. Should you require assistance in securing or applying the twibbon, please send a message to @KatseyeProject_bot, and our team will gladly assist you. A grand note of gratitude to @lSophia and @aDaniela, who crafted this twibbon with su…
🔥2
ㅤㅤㅤ 𝑪𝑨𝑺𝑬 𝑭𝑰𝑳𝑬 #0723: 𝑺𝑼𝑩𝑱𝑬𝑪𝑻 𝑨𝑵𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑳 Status: ACTIVE TARGET. Every instinct leaves a lethal, unmistakable mark in the dark. Proceed with caution. #KATSEYEInTheWild ㅤㅤㅤ
🔥2❤1💘1
Channel name was changed to «KATSEYE's #KATSEYEInTheWild #KATSEYEisSIX.»
Channel photo updated
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «KATSEYE's #22ClawsOfDaniela #KATSEYEisSIX.»
Channel photo updated
ㅤㅤㅤ 𝘕𝘰𝘵 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘵 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 #22ClawsOfDaniela 𓃮 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘥; ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 {𝐏𝐍𝐆} 😈 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐎𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 {𝐌𝐏𝟒} 🐾 Even the fiercest spirits leave traces for those who know where to look. Should the path ever feel uncertain, @KatseyeProject_bot ⚡️ quietly lingers where every footprint finds its…
❤7🔥4🏆3🍓2😍1
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ𝑰𝑵𝑺𝑻𝑰𝑵𝑪𝑻𝑺 𝑨𝑵𝑫 𝑶𝑷𝑼𝑳𝑬𝑵𝑪𝑬, 𝑨 ㅤㅤㅤ𝑭𝑬𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑬 𝑺𝑶𝑽𝑬𝑹𝑬𝑰𝑮𝑵𝑻𝒀 𓃮. ㅤA sleek, untamed dominance ㅤcommands the room without a ㅤsingle loud declaration, ㅤ #22ClawsOfDaniela. ㅤㅤㅤ𝘗𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘸𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 ㅤㅤㅤ𝘭𝘶𝘹𝘶𝘳𝘺. 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘨𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘯 ㅤㅤㅤ𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘴𝘩𝘦 ㅤㅤㅤ𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘴 🐆. ㅤㅤㅤ
🔥5❤2💋2❤🔥1👏1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
ㅤㅤㅤ 💫 Through an almost ethereal resonance, #ManonLitsUp24 reflects a presence that gently permeates every corner it touches, leaving an imprint both profound and enduring; ㅤㅤㅤ(𝘗𝘕𝘎) 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘙𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 ✦ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ❦ ㅤㅤㅤ✦ 𝘘𝘶𝘪𝘦𝘵 𝘔𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘮 (𝘔𝘗4) Its quiet resonance offers a subtle solace beyond words, a gentle assurance that even in @KatseyeProject_bot ⚡️ reaching hand will always find its way back. 👑 A heartfelt gra…
🔥8💘7💋5❤🔥3👏3❤2🎉2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KatseyeeProject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 21,885 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KATSEYE's #KATSEYEInTheWild #KATSEYEisSIX.” (@KatseyeeProject), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KatseyeeProject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.