Channel
@Katerina_Sorokina_design
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002679613507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Katerina_Sorokina_design |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Katerina_Sorokina_design |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 173 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 172 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 169 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 164 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 158 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 158 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 157 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 28.8% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 13.6% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 8.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
День рождения ещё не наступил, а подарочки уже начали приходить 🎁 Каюсь, до сих пор не читала эти книги, даже немного стыдно 🤭 вот теперь не отверчусь, начало проф библиотеки положено А вы читали? 👍 - да 👎 - нет ⚡ - эти нет, но посоветую другие в комментарии
👍2👎2
И разбавим личные посты полезными ссылками, иначе зачем мы тут собрались 📅 Летний ТехФест: 5 встреч, 5 офисов | 4-30 августа Ориентировано на разработку, но если сфера ваших интересов лежит в том числе в этой плоскости или хотите посмотреть офисы компаний — welcome! Мы дизайнерами идём на последнюю встречу в ТехноХаб Сбера, будет карьерный опен-эйр с диджей-сетами и нетворкингом ✌️ https://letniy-tekhfest.timepad.…
Ну что, как жизнь молодая и погода летняя? Стоило мне вернуться из Сибири, как уже на выходе из аэропорта почуяла — осенью пахнет! 🍂 Другой воздух, другие запахи, солнце другое Первые пару дней расстраивалась, потому что нормального лета в этом году нам не отсыпали. Но мозг, зараза, ко всему привыкает, поэтому теперь я с предвкушением ожидаю уютные вечера и золотые осенние парки. И как обычно лезу на Pinterest за ат…
⚡5💔3
Писала про Спектр, а меня нашли из Pixso. Вряд ли это связано, но в любом случае приятно 🤭
🔥2
Поднимите лапки, кому знаком синдром самозванца 🤝 не обошёл стороной и меня, жила с ним всю профессиональную жизнь, сколько себя помню Синдром знакомый, говорят о нем много, но редко встречаешь реальные истории от специалистов. И получается, что тема расхожая, случается у многих, но эти «многие» остаются неназванными и будто существуют где-то, но не вокруг нас. Поэтому вот пост про мои ощущения и что я с этим делаю:…
🤝4💘1
Кто менял специальность и ловил себя на страхе быть некомпетентным и не справиться? Или выходили на повышение грейда/в новую компанию/брали задачу и боялись не потянуть? Если не совершать перестройку мышления в голове, такое происходит постоянно, даже когда в сфере уже не первый год. Часто происходило и у меня, порой происходит до сих пор — о важности такой перестройки написала пост. 🔗 Ссылка на пост в Сетке Для ч…
👍6🔥2
Ловите отчет с ULCamp 🏕 Было мокро, весело и активно. Настолько активно, что вторые сутки отсыпаюсь без сил 😴 Мокли под дождем, месили грязь, купались в Волге, слушали доклады, танцевали, обсуждали работу и дизайн. Главный вывод: на этот кэмп большинство людей едут именно тусить с палатками и слушать музыку, хоть и заявляется кэмп как IT — мы не сразу поняли, почему люди смущаются, когда спрашиваешь, кем и где они…
🔥8❤5❤🔥5
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9🔥5
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Katerina_Sorokina_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Первоапрельская шутка” (@Katerina_Sorokina_design), 173 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Katerina_Sorokina_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.