Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Переводы Карпова

Channel

Переводы Карпова

@KarpovTranslations

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,606subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002392968278
TypeChannel
Username@KarpovTranslations
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KarpovTranslations

Growth

2,6002,6062,6036 August 2026 — 2,600 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,600 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,601 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,602 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,604 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,605 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,606 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 12 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,599–2,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 12:372,606+1
15 Aug 2026, 20:272,605+1
12 Aug 2026, 17:572,604+2
9 Aug 2026, 19:032,602+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:072,601+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:212,600no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:372,600first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.8%
avg views ÷ 2,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (26 February 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,377
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC735 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что-то я зачастил с постами. Но надо же сообщить, что я забрал деньги, собранные на эссе Уоллеса, и сбегаю с ними в Японию Но на самом деле нет( ((( Да и на аватарке не Япония, а безусловно узнаваемый канонический пейзаж Гонконга: небоскребы Жардин-хаус (ну да, в пиксель-арте его канонические круглые окна получаются плохо, больше похоже на Bank of America Tower, но тот на самом деле подразумевается на заднем плане с

4 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Семь лет (Seven Up!, 1964) Поговорили о текстовых переводах, переходим к кино. То молчал, а то начинаю спамить. Да и казалось бы, не лучшая идея – собирать деньги, когда и так собираешь деньги. Но эссе Уоллеса – вещь кратковременная, осенью уже выложу. Поторопитесь на нее скинуть! А этот сериал – ну, что ж, это явно проект на несколько лет вперед. Но оно стоит того. Итак, «Семь лет», или серия Up! - начало вашего н

2 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дэвид Фостер Уоллес, «Убраться подальше, когда вроде бы и так дальше некуда» (Getting Away from Already Being Pretty Much Away from It All, 1993) Я тут поспорил – уже не помню, на что, вероятно, на пиво, так что в проигрыше все равно не окажусь, – что не смогу собрать деньги на перевод. Никто, мол, книжки не читает, издавать на бумаге я не собираюсь, все дела. Попробуйте меня опровергнуть! В качестве первого перевод

31 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈3,000 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы наконец-то это сделали, теперь у меня есть сайт! Но по порядку Больше месяца назад моему каналу был год, и у меня в связи с этим имелась куча интересных штук, но при этом рядом была целая гора штук, которые надо сделать обязательно. На то, что я не успел, нужен отдельный пост (который я не успею написать); но зато сделали это Я давно думал о сайте, очень долго всеми силами с ним тянул, но теперь, несмотря на всю

26 Jun 2026, 18:12 UTC≈4,490 viewsread 7 August 2026

Приходите на встречу в Пархоменко 1 июля, будем обсуждать книжку от Поляндрии про Корею, которую я переводил, - "8 жизней госпожи Мук" (хм, где-то я это уже писал) Короче, астрологи с чего-то объявили неделю Кореи (и меня, видимо). Но на этой встрече я постараюсь сказать что-нибудь, что не упоминал в прошлый раз, чтобы было интересней Ну и, конечно, шугейз из Кореи. В этот раз я хотел порекомендовать, на мой взгляд,

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @KarpovTranslations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,695 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Переводы Карпова” (@KarpovTranslations), 2,606 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KarpovTranslations.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.