Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kanina

Channel

Kanina

@Kaninaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

789subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001168225730
TypeChannel
Username@Kaninaa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kaninaa

Growth

7897937917 August 2026 — 793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 793 subscribers15 August 2026 — 789 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 788–794 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:56789-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:45793no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:56793first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.6%
avg views ÷ 789 subscribers
Avg views / post
486
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held15 (13 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total2,432
Reactions total205
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊8519.3%
🔥7917.9%
👍6615.0%
😭5412.2%
😁357.94%
317.03%
🤣317.03%
💔204.54%
😢122.72%
👏71.59%
❤‍🔥61.36%
🏆40.907%
🤨40.907%
🤩30.68%
😍10.227%
🤝10.227%
🤪10.227%
🤯10.227%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 441reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC400 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На месте Григория Кузьмина я бы внимательнее следил за тем, что происходит за спиной

😁16

2 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC398 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После этой съемки 10-килограммовый блин в тренажерке никто не видел. Если у вас есть информация о его местонахождении - пишите

😁7🤣6

1 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC446 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мрак какой-то. Под лавиной в Пакистане погибли альпинисты, включая легендарного Нимса. Если не знаете, кто это - найдите в сети фильм 14 вершин: нет ничего невозможного» (14 Peaks: Nothing Is Impossible, 2021). Горы - вообще не моя тема, но посмотрев это, я стал фанатом улыбчивого мужика, который за полгода сделал невозможное. Жил ярко, и ушел ярко. Нирмал «Нимс» Пурджа (1983–2026) — непальско-британский альпинист,

🕊21

31 Jul 2026, 23:59 UTC473 views110 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы с Лёхой, можно сказать, одновременно начали путь в большом хоккее. Поэтому его имя у меня всегда вызывало ностальгию по тому «Амуру», который вернулся в Суперлигу в 2006 году и дорос до легендарного сезона с Ханну Йортиккой. Вчера вечером лежал и вспоминал кучу прикольных моментов. Как раскрашивали Лёхин первый шлем на студии аэрографии. Он тогда сказал: «Хочу пальмы и пляж». Я ему ответил: «Лёх, ты серьезно? Это

🕊64😭25😢12💔81

25 Jul 2026, 00:49 UTC715 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На Дальневосточный медиафорум сходил, мыслями поделился, с господином Губерниевым зарубился, 8 упоминаний богоспасаемого и родного клуба от одиозного телеведущего собрал. Собой доволен.

👍25👏6😁5🔥42🏆1🤣1🤩1

12 Jul 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,120 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Помните, как Шарик в «Простоквашино» с фоторужьём бегал по лесам и картинки делал? Вот я себя сегодня так почувствовал, пока бегал за двумя олимпийскими чемпионами по городу, чтобы автографы взять в рабочих целях 😅 Одного настиг в альма-матер, второго на набережной. В процессе вспотел в наших 90% влажности так, что чуть не поплыл. ЖКХ, вы реально охренели. Но цель достигнута, легендарность свитера теперь зашкаливае

🔥19👍10🏆3🤩2

27 Jun 2026, 02:50 UTC≈1,260 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Интересно ли вам было посещать тренировки команды летом и в сезоне по платным билетам?

  1. Да54%
  2. Да, если доплачивать будут мне31%
  3. Ни за что15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1😁1

27 Jun 2026, 02:47 UTC≈1,170 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ладно, про футбол забыли как про страшный сон. Теперь о важном

2

27 Jun 2026, 01:21 UTC≈1,170 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Решил посмотреть ЧМ по футболу. Выходной, время удобное, чего бы и нет? Уругвай - Испания. 55 минут сыграно. Один, один (!!!), блеать, удар в створ! Специалисты, скажите, это нормально?

🤨4

25 Jun 2026, 12:44 UTC990 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

За 20 лет работы в командах, я на пальцах двух, или даже одной руки могу сосчитать тех, с которыми у нас сложились дружеские отношения. Из новейшей истории могу вспомнить Мишу Йордана и Глеба Корягина. Сегодня вот ещё один переехал. Грустно, но что поделать. Такой бизнес.

😭29💔12👏1🤝1🤯1

24 Jun 2026, 10:13 UTC748 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Парня тут одного встретил. Говорят, знаменитость какая-то. На всякий случай взял автограф.

🔥51👍12😁2

21 Jun 2026, 08:24 UTC932 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Спортивные врачи - люди особые. То, с чем обычного человека принято отправлять в больницу, у них часто может вызвать реакцию «Ойблязаебалдержибаралгинисъебисьацюда». Но за этим внешним цинизмом и даже черствостью скрываются Люди с большой буквы и супер профессионалы. Тысячи спортивных карьер состоялись или были спасены благодаря клубным докторам. Да что там карьер. Наши врачи и жизни буднично спасали, например, в са

15👍11

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Kaninaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jun 2026, 02:50 UTCAnonymous Poll204 voters

Интересно ли вам было посещать тренировки команды летом и в сезоне по платным билетам?

  1. Да54%
  2. Да, если доплачивать будут мне31%
  3. Ни за что15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kanina” (@Kaninaa), 789 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaninaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.