Channel
@Kaiserkas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
296subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002210820858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kaiserkas |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kaiserkas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 296 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 293 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 293 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (11 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,295 |
| Reactions total | 622 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
784 reactions across 17 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.31% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6287182529015322356 | 73 | 9.31% | |
| custom 5395471018271727596 | 64 | 8.16% | |
| custom 5350517751658067541 | 52 | 6.63% | |
| custom 5330301456559939967 | 34 | 4.34% | |
| custom 5357514004275169962 | 34 | 4.34% | |
| custom 5267142841485795069 | 32 | 4.08% | |
| custom 5352741204687598113 | 29 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5436275586995599017 | 29 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5307997450873632420 | 28 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5422809700586526790 | 27 | 3.44% | |
| custom 5258089016066085581 | 21 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5289532574719297903 | 20 | 2.55% | |
| custom 5397928375220204274 | 19 | 2.42% | |
| custom 5199860409267427756 | 18 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5262909790438318046 | 17 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5267272734181731293 | 17 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5271594905800578700 | 16 | 2.04% | |
| custom 5314564640552792330 | 16 | 2.04% | |
| custom 5330565820386945748 | 14 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5397764144260740837 | 14 | 1.79% | |
| 39 further kinds | 210 | 26.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 784reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kaiserkas. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
мизисуа, но это Т. А. Т. У. 🌟🌟 #Дидж #зомст
custom 526714284148579506932custom 539792837522020427419custom 526727273418173129317custom 54610884119285103696custom 53733402243215254835custom 53978229853126935013custom 53729411016006481692custom 53799042099551027722
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Posted without readable text
custom 628718252901532235617
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
- Не пора ли нам выпить чаю, детектив?©️ Граф Ди - главный персонаж манги "Магазинчик ужасов" 1994 года. Он эксцентричный, загадочный и уточнённый владелец необычного зоомагазина в Чайнатауне Лос-Анджелеса. Ди обладает выраженной андрогинной внешностью, из-за чего люди часто принимают его за девушку; носит роскошные традиционные китайские шёлковые ципао и имеет длинные ухоженные ногти. А ещё он невероятно сильно люб…
custom 628718252901532235615
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
◈⎯⎯⤏˖⁺.₊𓂃 ۫ ꣑ৎ ۫ 𓂃₊.⁺˖ ⎯⎯⤏◈ ☀️𝒮𝓊𝓂𝓂ℯ𝓇 𝓋𝒾𝒷ℯ𝓈
custom 628718252901532235620
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Ивантиллы но теперь в дидже 💗 #gdbii_fanart
custom 628718252901532235621
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Кая повстанцы эдишн Из-за того, что она искусственный человек, она физически слабая, но это ей не мешает трудиться во благо Сопротивления #Дидж #алнст
custom 542280970058652679027custom 519986040926742775618custom 526031064802948127911custom 54224160367690783417custom 52602739432389699686custom 52602956457087189903custom 52627390697832796903custom 53980609694505677533
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
кловка, я, моя оска космопоня и реквест кайзерке!
custom 539547101827172759625
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Ещё один реквест. Рисую сейчас вне дома, так что особо возможно вылизывать работы нет. К тому же появился приоритет в виде кмм. Энивэй я отрисую оставшиеся реквесты, не переживайте. Просто они будут...ленивыми... Как этот. #реквест #ос #дидж #скетч
custom 539547101827172759619
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Мега дроп думед юри @Kaiserkas #oc #art #digital
custom 539547101827172759617
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
лукахёны, но это шамазулины #Дидж #алнст
custom 535751400427516996234custom 527159490580057870016custom 540219425699768036513custom 52290184654985969008custom 53596153986291144728custom 52268721329018277655custom 52832737293322548583custom 54228398040123008372
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Фулл ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/+iBlUItcC_dBkMDMy
custom 531456464055279233011custom 51906241722916839858custom 53527412046875981135custom 54358605771906875992custom 53954710182717275961
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Ребят, я не буду от вас скрывать что я взяла за референс позу с другого арта. Оказалось, что тот сделан с помощью ИИ и я не заметила этого (прикреплю его в коммах для понимания). Сейчас я уже свой арт исправила, но мне пздц стыдно теперь за руку ту Если хотите, сделаю нсфв версию бесплатной в качестве компенсации
custom 535051775165806754112custom 54362755869955990177custom 53527412046875981135custom 51905604092072084002custom 53954710182717275961custom 54497714136217410231
Signed <𝟑 𐌺ᥲᥔɜᥱρκᥲ
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Kaiserkas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Перепись населения 🍨🍨
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 117,966 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐊𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐤𝐚'𝐬” (@Kaiserkas), 296 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaiserkas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.