Mula sa Masusugid naming tagasubaybayππ₯ Sipag lang at Dedikasyon magiging Malakas kayoπͺ

Channel
πΆππππππππ π¬πππππππππ 44
@KabataangAmangbayan44
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
115subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002024203681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KabataangAmangbayan44 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KabataangAmangbayan44 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 115 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 114 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 113 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 115 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 115 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 19s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Recent posts
English version of the meme.
Another thing to note is that the pigs fear those with real money and power. This is not hyperbole. Notice the difference in their treatment of leftists and cultists (Iglesia Ni Cristo fags) during public demonstrations. Where the pigs would immediately swarm, cuff, and even shoot the former without hesitation, they'd barely do anything when it comes to the latter. One of the cultists literally threatened some randomβ¦
As much as we don't like leftists (NDs) in general, you have to give credit where it's due. We admit that this is pretty daring by doing right beside a pig too. This was during the Marcos' 2026 State of the Nation Address (SONA). It's something that we should all learn from and remind us to step up our game. If they can do it, so can we. Out of all the bullshit that's happened this year, the mass increase of radicaliβ¦
πΆππππππππ π¬πππππππππ 44 pinned a photo
WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED Read our new essay here. https://write.as/kabataang-amangbayan-44/what-you-might-have-missed @KabataanAmangbayan44
TSEKWA LAYAS! (CHINKS OUT!) Artwork by Kam Seasick @KabataanAmangbayan44
πΆππππππππ π¬πππππππππ 44 pinned a photo
Read our new Substack article here: https://open.substack.com/pub/amangb4y4n/p/our-course-of-action-for-the-coming @KabataanAmangbayan44
This whole TCC bullshit is genuinely so retarded it's pissing us off just thinking about it. Like, if you really wanna be a fucking send-off and do a mass shooting, why not do it in a way that not only gets you what you want (which is to kill people) but also takes out people who are fucking everyone over? That way youβd get hailed as a hero rather than clowned as some deranged loser, while also implicating other unrβ¦
Nung panahon ng aming kabataan,hindi na bago na manlalaban kami sa mga "Bully" gamit ang kamao at tadyak,ngayon inalis ng sistema ang ganong Kultura kaya nanlalaban na ang mga bata gamit ang Barilπ Patunay lang na Palpak ang Sistemaπ
Masaya sa LSKπ! Maliban kung Bading kaπ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KabataangAmangbayan44. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΆππππππππ π¬πππππππππ 44β (@KabataangAmangbayan44), 115 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KabataangAmangbayan44.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.