Строю шоколадное производство в Санкт-Петербурге.
Цукаты в шоколаде, конфеты, линейка без сахара. Доставка в любую точку России.
Про вкус, бизнес и корпоративные подарки.
Мы на маркетплейсах ➡️
https://taplink.cc/kutkevich.ru
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 12:01
191
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:45
191
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.8%
avg views ÷ 191 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held
14 (24 June 2026 – 19 July 2026)
Views total
78
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
523
Videos
184
Links
145
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
36
61.0%
🔥
10
16.9%
❤🔥
7
11.9%
👍
3
5.08%
💯
2
3.39%
🙈
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Привет, дорогие! Видео шутливое конечно, но..
Почему я решила так стремительно снова переехать?
Меня всегда учили, что скорость — ключевое качество предпринимателя. Мне предложили другое помещение с арендной ставкой в разы ниже и более подходящее для пищевого производства. Но. Решение нужно было принять за один день. Переехать — за два 😅.
К слову, это 5-й переезд за 4,5 года моей работы 🙈. И каждый раз причина - в…
Сегодня тот день, когда отмечают Всемирный день шоколада.
И каждый раз я ловлю себя, что мы настолько привыкли к этому невероятному продукту, что редко задумываемся, с чего вообще всё начинается.
А начинается он вот с таких необычных какао-плодов, да-да именно так они выглядят и внутри которых находятся какао-бобы — основа настоящего шоколада.
Удивительно, что природа создаёт настолько совершенные вещи.
Из неболь…
Сразу после переезда я ушла в небольшой отпуск.
Июнь получился очень насыщенным. Проверка Роспотребнадзора. Подготовка к «Честному знаку». Переезд производства. Перестройка процессов. И ещё много того, что остаётся за кадром.
Мне было очень важно сделать паузу и отключиться от рабочих задач. Сейчас такой этап, что я практически пересобираю бизнес.
Какие-то процессы меняю полностью. Какие-то начинаю с нуля. И мне х…
Я приняла одно важное решение по поводу маркетплейсов.
Последние несколько месяцев я внимательно анализировала отзывы покупателей.
И заметила одну закономерность.
Как только продукция начинает храниться на складе Wildberries, появляются замечания, связанные именно с качеством.
При этом я никак не могу повлиять на то, где и при какой температуре хранится товар.
Не знаю, сколько времени он лежит на складе.
Не зна…
Я снова переезжаю
Помню, как прошлой осенью говорила себе: «Всё, это последний переезд производства».
Но бизнес любит показывать, что планы иногда приходится менять.
И знаете что?
Сейчас я этому даже рада.
Завтра снова буду собирать коробки, оборудование, инвентарь и перевозить всё производство.
Правда, в этот раз переезд намного спокойнее.
Я остаюсь в том же здании.
Просто переезжаю с первого этажа на четвер…
Недавно я писала про то, что у меня должна была пройти проверка Роспотребнадзора.
Хотела тогда рассказать подробнее, но решила немного отложить эту историю — хотелось сначала пройти всё и уже спокойно поделиться результатом.
Проверка состоялась.
В целом всё прошло нормально.
Были стандартные процедуры: посмотрели производство, документы, продукцию. Взяли образцы на проверку.
Сказали, что есть несколько моментов, кото…
Как вы считаете, а негативные отзывы - это повод поговорить о продукте? Как вы реагируете на негативные отзывы?
Недавно увидела комментарий «В баночке всего 8 корочек и это не стоит своих денег», или «Вкусно, но мало».
Когда я встречаю такие отзывы, то всегда задумываюсь что наверное я немножко не донесла ценность своему продукту.
В моменте мне конечно хотелось написать, что во-первых, не 8, а минимум 10, если мы…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @KUTKEVICH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,249,091 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШОКОЛАДНОЕ ПРОИЗВОДСТВО КАК ИСКУССТВО | ВАЛЕРИЯ КУТКЕВИЧ” (@KUTKEVICH), 191 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KUTKEVICH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.