Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

KS note

@KS_note

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

579subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141687845
TypeChannel
Username@KS_note
DescriptionEVERYTHING & NOTHING @MostPow3rful
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/KS_note

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:02579first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
61
Links
76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4235.3%
❤‍🔥2823.5%
🏆1815.1%
🐳1512.6%
🆒86.72%
👌54.20%
10.84%
👏10.84%
🦄10.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KS_note. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 October 2024 to 10 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2026, 19:00 UTC306 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sourcebyte

< Scam Alert > New Threat Actor steal famous "IrLeaks" telegram support ID & tuta mail after their support account been inactive for a while ( their accounts deleted automatically due to privacy policy ) , as i look at my archives this is previous accounts you can use to verify them : [ + ] Exploit[.]in MemberID : 150525 ( Last visited : September 7, 2024 ) [ + ] BreachForums UserID : 46196 [ + ] BreachForums Ema

🔥4

Signed Kian Shahi

23 Feb 2026, 21:17 UTC≈1,060 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥9🐳3🔥1🦄1

Signed Kian Shahi

23 Feb 2026, 20:50 UTC≈1,220 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://javidnamaan.com/

❤‍🔥8🔥1

Signed Kian Shahi

22 Feb 2026, 11:04 UTC805 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sourcebyte

< Scam Alert > New Threat Actor steal famous "IrLeaks" support ID after their support account been inactive for a while ( their account deleted automatically ) , as i look at my archives this is previous accounts you can use to verify them : [ + ] Exploit[.]in MemberID : 150525 ( Last visited : September 7, 2024 ) [ + ] BreachForums UserID : 46196 [ + ] BreachForums Email address : irleaks@proton.me ( Creation ti

Signed Kian Shahi

13 Feb 2026, 23:48 UTC996 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @xyz_remedy

Glider workshop is live on YouTube. How to Find Web3 Vulnerabilities Using Real Exploits We break down real-world exploits and turn their root causes into Glider queries. Watch now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X62snOiCfF8

🔥3

Signed Kian Shahi

5 Jan 2026, 19:05 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2007865848766050416

Signed Kian Shahi

7 Dec 2025, 09:54 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @OxDecentralizerPhoto

یه کمپین باحالی توی X به اسم "Chain of Thought" راه افتاده که افراد میان و نظراتشون درباره‌ی اینکه ai در ۲۰۲۶ و ۲۰۳۰ و ۲۰۴۰ به کجاها خواهد رفت می‌گن و در آخر یه نفر رو تگ می‌کنن که اون زنجیره و ادامه بده. من لینک آخرین توییت زنجیره رو می‌ذارم، که می‌تونید به‌صورت backward تا ابتدای زنجیره بیاید و چیزای باحالی بخونید. 🔗 https://x.com/InfectedCrypto/status/1993710601017729232?t=hQCbeVy7_E_saMI-wIgwEg&s=19

🏆6

Signed Kian Shahi

21 Nov 2025, 09:09 UTC≈2,920 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://www.kayssel.com/series/web3/

🔥4

Signed Kian Shahi

13 Nov 2025, 14:05 UTC≈1,080 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

OWASP TOP 10 2023 VS 2025

🔥12👏1

Signed Kian Shahi

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KS_note. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KS note” (@KS_note), 579 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KS_note.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.