Ура , нас 16. #Koss. #Щп.
❤🔥1

Channel
@KOLOTbCR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004397499777 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KOLOTbCR |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KOLOTbCR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 27 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 26 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 19 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 16 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 16 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5327824767963661915 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 3.45% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KOLOTbCR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ура , нас 16. #Koss. #Щп.
❤🔥1
#mrp. #Koss.
Пиар постэк Здρᥲʙᥙя ᥰуᴛнᥙκ! 𐋏ᥱ ᥊᧐чᥱɯь ᥰρ᧐ᴦу᧘яᴛьᥴя ᥰ᧐ ⲙ᧐ᥱⲙу κᥲнᥲ᧘у? Тᥲⲙ δудᥱᴛ.. ✧ ~᧘᧐ᴛы, ᧘᧐ʙы, ᥙ дρуᴦᥙᥱ κ᧐нκуρᥴы⊹ ~ʙᥙдᥱ᧐, ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛы, арты⊹ ~ᥙ дρуᴦ᧐ᥱ!⊹ Немного о мне Я эклипс, рисую арты на заказ, снимаю о игре cat simulator animal life , и о других фандомах, остальная инфа в канале) ⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅ ꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚ https://t.me/laifhakiOTvetro https://t.me/laifhakiOTvetro…
Актив / интерактив опрос. Ответите сколько сможете. Можно 1 соо. 1. какое время года вам нравится больше всего? 2. почему именно оно? 3. какое время года вы не любите и почему? 4. есть ли у вас любимый месяц? 5. какое время года ассоциируется у вас с детством? 6. когда вы чувствуете себя счастливее всего? 7. какое время года для вас самое уютное? 8. когда у вас больше энергии? 9. любите ли вы смену сезонов? …
Окей,спойлер. #Koss.
❤🔥2❤1
#Koss. Чужой анти пиар.
😢1
акула стоит на своем и теперь пишет, что я виновата частично? нет уж, я даже не знаю, кто ей канал зарейдил, а она уже думает, что мои подписчики снесли ей канал. человек просто хуйней страдает. ее репутация будет ниже плинтуса, я уверена по ответам понятно, что она даже не может за свои слова ответить. и да, можете писать в коммы, что я такая плохая, ломаю психику неразумной девочке своей "травлей", мне вообще абсо…
😱2❤1
Фуррятина? Подготовка к видео... #Koss.
custom 53278247679636619154❤🔥1👍1💋1
Здравствуйте. Я - Кось , художник , по немного пытающийся начать анимировать и заново учащийся монтировать и делать Эдиты... Из известных раньше я была Чёрной звездой и Кровавой ролью,но на данный момент как персонаж так и псевдоним поменялся. Рисую я около 7-8 лет и с самого начала меня заинтересовали коты,ТК раньше я жила с ними 25/8 и по сей день живу. Я так и не придумала пред историю моему персонажу,но оно разви…
🔥2custom 53278247679636619152❤1❤🔥1💋1
Маты в видео. Заранее пишу пост о ресте Рест будет длится от 30 августа до 10 сентября.Если вы намерены получить свои арты как можно быстрее , прошу напомнить о них сейчас ( кому СРОЧНО надо. ) Так же после реста будет акция,за пиар в канал 30+ будет получен арт по плечи/чиби. Удачи. #Koss.
💋2custom 53278247679636619151
Что ?Я вам это не отправляла?Да не,вы шутите. 🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫 #Koss.
💋3❤🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @KOLOTbCR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@KOLOTbCR named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хаширо Кось и его истребители.” (@KOLOTbCR), 27 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KOLOTbCR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.