Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КККК: Заметки

@KKKKnotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,445subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276289361
TypeChannel
Username@KKKKnotes
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KKKKnotes

Growth

2,4452,4472,4467 August 2026 — 2,447 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,447 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,445 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,445–2,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:122,445-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:472,447no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:472,447first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.2%
avg views ÷ 2,445 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held15 (19 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total19,878
Reactions total834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

834 reactions across 15 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
51361.5%
😍637.55%
👍425.04%
🍾404.80%
🔥384.56%
😁344.08%
💔161.92%
🤪161.92%
💊131.56%
❤‍🔥101.20%
💯91.08%
🤔80.959%
🙊50.6%
💅30.36%
😭30.36%
🙏30.36%
🤯30.36%
🆒20.24%
🍌20.24%
👌20.24%
8 further kinds91.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC636 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О ролике про комика, который стал режиссером ужасов. Я создал свое самое красивое эссе. Оно, с точки зрения РЕЖИССУРЫ монтажа, прям вишенка. Само по себе работает как ужастик. Чтоб вы понимали, я настолько заморочился, что наговаривал текст под музыку, чтоб максимально синхронизировать аудиоряд. Короче, не то что горжусь, а твердо и четко считаю его самым красивым, самым режиссерким моим роликом. НО Выпустить ег

42🙊4🤯2🤗1😍1🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC728 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Начали трансляцию: https://www.twitch.tv/dimakungurov

5👍1

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC804 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На прошлой неделе мы с Димой Кунгуровым провели стрим, посвященный «Обсессии». Его запись можно глянуть здесь — https://youtu.be/sy-OMVKcmpw После чего приняли стратегическое решение выйти в эфир снова. И даже назвать это целой рубрикой. Барабанная дробь… «АНАЛИЗЫ» Да, вот такие мы креативные! Сегодня встречаемся на втрой стрим. В 18:00 по мск. Будем говорить про «Все страхи Бо». Приходите, слушайте, выбирайте

🍾239🔥3👍2

3 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC885 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Честно говоря, обещал себе больше никогда не делать ролики про Нолана. С него и с Тарантино уже прям ХВАТИТ. Но "Одиссея" не дает мне покоя. Одна история выше чего стоит. А ведь там такого очень много на всех уровнях. Например, вы заметили, что Нолан появилась новая магистральная тема на замену времени? (или параллельно со временем) Я знаю одного эссеиста, который тоже собирался сделать таки видос по Нолану. Возмож

😍40👍1712

3 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC865 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shortfilm_aboutlovePhoto

Мы все читаем о том, что "Одиссея" Нолана была снята на пленочную камеру IMAX, а как вообще так вышло, что режиссер "запал" на этот формат? Эта история началась 20 лет назад в Лондоне, в цилиндрическом здании кинотеатра BFI IMAX у вокзала Ватерлоо (как раз тот, который, по словам Насти, осаждали 27 тысяч синефилов, пытаясь купить билет на "Одиссею" на сентябрь). Именно там завязалась дружба режиссера с двумя ключевы

😍22💔166🔥6🙊1

2 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈1,040 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Знаете, странное чувство. Я слышал про «Одиссею» так много. Столько умных слов писали критики, столько зла и ненависти изливали комментаторы, столько споров, анализов, восхищений, размышлений. Но когда сегодня я посмотрел «Одиссею», то поймал себя на том, что никто не сказал того, чем фильм оказался на самом деле. «Одиссея» — это вообще не про темнокожую Елену (ее тут минут на 5 и вообще плевать какого она цвета),

109🍾7👍6💊3🍌2🌭1💯1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC≈1,480 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kinopoisk_soonPhoto

«Одиссея» Кристофера Нолана собрала в мировом прокате более 727 млн долларов всего за 12 дней. Картина уже вошла в четверку самых кассовых фильмов года, уступая только трем релизам-миллиардерам: «Истории игрушек 5», «Майклу» и сиквелу «Супер Марио». В ближайшие дни «Одиссея» тоже прееодолеет рубеж в 1 млрд долларов, и это при том, что в некоторых регионах прокат еще не начался. 🗞 Подписаться на Новости

30👍9💊6🍾2

28 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,400 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ninesixteenPhoto

Идём разбирать «Обсессию» через 55 минут! Монтажный стол настроил, материалы со съемок собрал, все интересные факты на Miro выложил, в историю режиссёра погрузился, его ранние короткометражки пересмотрел, обрамление красивое сделал, свет выставил, а главное — мы придумали название шоу, которым будут гордиться наши внуки А ещё есть спойлер, короче, к эфиру. Они брат и сестра. Заходите узнать подробнее: https://www.

9🍾6

27 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,550 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Завтра в 18:00 по МСК мы с Димой Кунгуровым проведем стрим! В наших планах встречаться так на постоянной основе, говорить про кино, звать интересных гостей и превращать всё это в эссе! Завтра будем МНОГО и кропотливо разбирать «Обсессию». Главный хоррор и важнейший инди-хит этого года. Как раз подстать скорому выходу ролика про Пила. Так что ждём всех завтра на стриме. Будет круто! Ссылку опубликую ближе к началу

29🔥7🍾2🙏2👀1

25 Jul 2026, 19:53 UTC≈1,660 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @streamingverse

В общем, ждал вечера субботы, чтобы посмотреть, переживёт ли «Одиссея» ажиотаж первого уикенда (должна была подъехать полная аналитика пятницы). Пережила. И вывод теперь примерно такой: миллиард долларов мировой кассы из красивой цели превратился почти в формальность. Интрига сместилась выше — к $1,2 млрд и рекорду фильмов с рейтингом R (сейчас он, как ни печально, принадлежит третьему «Дэдпулу». Второй уикенд в США

28🤔5👌2

21 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,680 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой ваш любимый фильм Джордана Пила?

  1. Прочь (Get out)38%
  2. Мы (Us)13%
  3. Нет (Nope)9%
  4. Кто это такой?33%
  5. Не люблю ужасы22%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11

20 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,810 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Больше всего на ютубе я устал от роликов про "Матрицу". Честно. Правда. Хватит. Но есть нюанс. Я устал от роликов про ПЕРВУЮ Матрицу. Ее обсосали уже со всех сторон. Каждый кадр, каждую цитату. Цвет, звук, символы, слова, буквы ВСЁ А мой братан Ирвин взял и сделал ролик по двум другим частям. И, вы не поверите, там: а) оч много нового б) вообще нет про злосчастные "смыслы", а только про контекст вокруг, что оказа

47👍7💊4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @KKKKnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTCAnonymous Poll377 voters

Какой ваш любимый фильм Джордана Пила?

  1. Прочь (Get out)38%
  2. Мы (Us)13%
  3. Нет (Nope)9%
  4. Кто это такой?33%
  5. Не люблю ужасы22%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 626,318 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КККК: Заметки” (@KKKKnotes), 2,445 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KKKKnotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.