Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔥کیسه پلاس√🔥

@KISEPLUSS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

650subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001154317211
TypeChannel
Username@KISEPLUSS
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KISEPLUSS

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@KISEPLUS/7198226 Jul 2026, 00:17 UTC@KISEPLUSS/58406 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 00:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@KISEPLUS/7198326 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC@KISEPLUSS/58407 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@KISEPLUSS/58408 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 23:51 UTC@KISEPLUS/7198426 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC1.0072 seconds
@KISEPLUS/7198829 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC@KISEPLUSS/58412 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@KISEPLUS/719913 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC@KISEPLUSS/58415 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@KISEPLUS/719924 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC@KISEPLUSS/58416 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KISEPLUS14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (122)
@FC_PERSSEPOLIS8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @KISEPLUS. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

649650649.56 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 649 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:51 — 650 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:317 Aug 2026, 05:51
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 649–650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:51650+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:31649first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 650 subscribers
Avg views / post
130
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,463
Reactions total93
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3840.9%
2526.9%
👏1920.4%
😭77.53%
💔44.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

دلتنگی برای پرسپولیس، فقط دلتنگی برای ۹۰ دقیقه فوتبال نیست؛ دلتنگی برای آن لحظه‌ای است که با اولین سوت داور، همه غصه‌های دنیا را فراموش می‌کردیم. برای فریادهای از ته دل بعد از هر گل، برای استرس دقایق آخر و برای شادی‌هایی که فقط این تیم می‌توانست به ما هدیه بدهد. روزهایی که پرسپولیس بازی ندارد، انگار چیزی کم است؛ انگار ضربان هفته، آرام‌تر می‌زند. ما هواداران، عاشق پیراهنی هستیم که با هر بردش جان می‌گیریم و با هر باخت

1

Signed 🦅☠꧅ꬅϦร๏ย尺☠🦅

5 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @beshkanPhoto

⚠️هشدار؛ یک «عکس یادگاری» و سرقت ۳۰۰ میلیون تومان از حساب بانکی یک کاربر در شبکه‌های اجتماعی روایت کرده است که خانواده همخانه‌اش، تمام پول موردنیاز برای اثبات تمکن مالی مهاجرت را در حساب پدر خانواده نگه می‌داشتند؛ پولی که قرار نبود به آن دست بزنند. به گفته این کاربر، فردی فایلی با عنوان «عکس یادگاری» برای پدر خانواده فرستاد. او فایل را باز کرد و مدتی بعد متوجه شدند گوشی‌اش آلوده شده و ۳۰۰ میلیون تومان از حساب بانکی

4

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

4 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC80 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‏کنایه فیروز کریمی به تاجررررنیا: یادتون رفته تو(3 الی 4)دقیقه به پایان بازی‌ها قهرمانی لیگ رو از دست دادین (( گرجی دوس داشتنی )) حالا با چه منطقی!! میخواستین تو لیگی ک فقط 22 هفته از اون برگــذار شده ، شما روقهرمان اعلام کنند !!!؟؟؟😐 __________ تو لیگ بیست وسوم « 2 هفته نتونستین تیمـتون رو تو صدرجدول نگهدارین» بعد میخواستین ، لیگی که هنوز(⅓)بازی هاش مونده بودرو بـا یک هفته صدرنشینی جام رو به شما بدهنــد !!!!!!😂 ____

👍5

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

3 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

پرسپولیس دیروز در ادمه روند آماده سازی پیش از فصل خود در ترکیه،با تیم ارزروم اسپور ترکیه بازی کرد و با نتیجه (6 بر 0) بازی رو برد ، هر دو تیم در این بازی تا حدودی از بازیکنان ذخیره خود استفاده کردند... واکنش علیرضا اشـرف، مدیر رسانه ای پرسپولیس،بعد از پایان این بازی ،در قبال نتیجه ای 6بر0ی که در بازی رقم خورد #اعداد_آشنـــــــا #Al_Wasl_UAE_Coach😄 #𝐆𝐋𝐔𝐓 ↳🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆✰√ ┄┅┅══❅══┅┅┄ @KISEPLUSS ┄┅┅══❅══┅┅┄ ‏‌

4

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

3 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

فریده شجاعی: نایب رئیس فدراسیون فوتبال( وهمسر پیشکسوت فقید استقلال-آقای منصور پورحــــیدری) فریده شجاعی؛ تو بازی شیش تای سال(52)خودم در استادیوم بودم و بازی رو دیدم انباری ما پر است از نوارهای ویدیویی استقلال... دوست دارم فیلم بازی(6_0) را پیدا کنم و به پرسپولیسی‌ها بفروشم،شاید با پولش،مطالبات قدیمی همسرم مرحومم منصور پورحیدری که استقلال نمی‌پردازد،جبران شود.... ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ حداقل(7هفت)عضو اصلی فدراسیون و هیئت

👏5

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

2 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC105 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

3بازی پیش روی پرسپولیس در سه هفته ابتــــدابی لیگ برتر ایران... #𝐆𝐋𝐔𝐓 ↳🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆✰√ ┄┅┅══❅══┅┅┄ @KISEPLUSS ┄┅┅══❅══┅┅┄

👍4

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

29 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC167 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

واقعاً موندم اسم اینا رو چی بزارم!🤔 1:اول از همه، با بریدن سرملوان و بی عدالتی محض(2امتیازمعیشتی به جیب استقلال واریزشد) وگرنه جایگاه واقعی استقلال ،طبق اتفاقات فوتبالی(صدرجدول نبوده)و‌#سپاهان_صدرنشین_واقعی_است و_باید_2_امتیاز_ملوان_برگرده 2:چراتیم نفتی حکومتی که جزء #اولین_وسرسخت_ترین_تیمها_برای_متوقف_کردن_لیگ_بود وبشدت با برگذاری ادامه لیگ مخالفت میکرد حالا حرف از ضایع شدن حق میزنه!؟ 3:چرابعد ازاینکه مسئولان فوتبال

👍6

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

29 Jul 2026, 02:53 UTC155 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🏅حریفان پرسپولیس در نیم فصل اول: 🏅هفته اول: شمس‌آذر 🏅هفته دوم: اس‌تقلال خوزستان 🏅هفته سوم: تراکتور 🏅هفته چهارم: ملوان 🏅هفته پنجم: استقلال نفتی حکومتی 🏅هفته ششم: ذوب‌آهن 🏅هفته هفتم: خیبر 🥇هفته هشتم: صنعت نفت 🥇هفته نهم: مس شهر بابک 🏅هفته دهم: فولاد 🥇هفته یازدهم: نساجی 🏅هفته دوازدهم: فجر 🏅هفته سیزدهم: پیکان 🏅هفته چهاردهم: آلومینیوم 🏅هفته پانزدهم: سپاهان 🏅هفته شانزدهم: گلگهر 🏅هفته هفدهم: چادرملو @KISEPLUSS

👍3

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

27 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC172 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‍ ⚠️ هشدار پیام‌هایی مانند «عکس‌های قدیمی‌ات را پیدا کردم» می‌تواند حساب بانکی‌تان را خالی کند! پیامی از طرف یک دوست یا عضو خانواده دریافت می‌کنید: «چند عکس قدیمی‌ات را پیدا کردم» یا «این عکس یادگاری را با هوش مصنوعی ساختم.» همراه پیام نیز یک لینک یا فایل قرار دارد. ظاهر ماجرا صمیمی و کنجکاوی‌برانگیز است، اما ممکن است پشت آن یک حمله فیشینگ یا بدافزار مخفی شده باشد. ◾️کلاهبرداران معمولاً از عبارت‌هایی مانند این استف

5

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

27 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC128 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

از طریق ،دوست ،رفیق ، فامیل همکاری ک هک کردن همچنین فایل های میفرستن براتون شما هم بیخبر از همه جا فایل رو باز میکنید حساب های بانکی و رنزهاتون هک میشه،اطلاعات شما دزدیده میشه ومجدد همین اتفاق ، رو برای مخاطبین ذخیره شده در گوشی شما تکرار میکنند... ـــــــــــــــ کلیک کردن روی"لیک های ناشناس فایل های ناشناس پیام مخرب و ناشناس اکیداً ممنوع... ـــــــــــــــ فایل یهویی از دوستی که سالها ازش خبر نداری برات اومده،بدون

4

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

26 Jul 2026, 23:51 UTC126 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بفرستید برای خلیفه و گودرزی و اسانی و تاجرنیا و هولدینگ شون .سوای غیرقانونی بودن بازگشت اسانی و احتمالا رضائیان و ۴ خارجی دیگر که فسخ کرده اند جذب خلیفه و گودرزی هم غیرقانونی است.اگر پنجره باز نشود انها نمی توانند با تیمی که پنجره اش بسته است قرارداد ببندند و بعد مخفیانه و بدون ثبت به تیمی قرض داده شوند.خطر واقعی تر اینکه استقلال انها را معارفه هم کرده.تیمی این دو را بگیرد با اتش بازی کرده. مواردی را همکارمان پدرا

👍5

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

26 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC151 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✎____________ یاسر آسانی (پنالتی زدن به آسانی)وقتی با تیم نفتِ استقلال فسخ می‌کنه سه باشگاه پرسپولیس ،تراکتور و سپاهان باهاش وارد مذاکره میشوند ✎____________ ایجنت آقایی آسانی هم فسخ نامه‌ی بازیکنش رو برای هر ســـــه باشگاه فرستاده حالا مدیران(تراکتور و سپاهان) باشگاه استقلال رو تهدید کردند کــه اگه قرارداد جدید آسانی با استقلال ثبت بشه به فیفا شکایت مــــیکنند...  #Al_Wasl_UAE_Coach😄 #𝐆𝐋𝐔𝐓 ↳🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆✰√ ┄┅┅══❅══┅┅┄ @K

👍7

Signed √𝕊U𝕆ℝ𝔼ℕ𝔸‌

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KISEPLUSS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 984,478 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥کیسه پلاس√🔥” (@KISEPLUSS), 650 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KISEPLUSS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.