😇🙂🙃 😅Diamond 🌌등업 문의: 연락하기 ✅블루오션 BEST PREMIUM✅ ✅SHINSEGAE Premium Network✅ 💛💛 💛 💛💛💛 💛 💛💛💛💛 에그 • 라우터 • 데이터유심 • eSIM 전문 ⏩ 정보 통신 면허 보유 ⏩ IP 보안 설계 및 맞춤 세팅 부터 유지보수 관리 ⏩ 유동 IP • 고정 IP • 보안 방화벽 네트워크 구축 ✅ 강력 보안 제공 무약정 무명의 ✅ 구매 이후 30분 배송 보장 ✅ 유동 IP 위치 추적 불가능 ⏩ 24시간 항시 대기 1초 상담 약속 ⏩ 주말! 야간! 공휴일! 작업 가능 ✅ 수많은 고객이 선택한 이유, 직접 경험해 보세요✅ 💛💛💛💛 @okip8282 💛💛💛💛 @okip111 (공지채널)

Channel
유심 라우터 통신 Premium채널
@KBOblue5_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,261subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001955430372 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KBOblue5_com |
| Created | 12 March 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KBOblue5_com |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 2,261 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 2,264 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 2,270 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 2,268 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 2,268 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 12 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.94%
- avg views ÷ 2,261 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 157
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (12 March 2023 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 314 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,183 reactions across 3 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,510 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 1,500 | 11.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,490 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,480 | 11.2% | |
| ❤ | 1,463 | 11.1% | |
| 🤩 | 1,450 | 11.0% | |
| 💯 | 1,440 | 10.9% | |
| 😍 | 1,430 | 10.8% | |
| 🥰 | 1,420 | 10.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2023 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 🤣 그랜드 💗 💗💗💗 💗💗💗 💗 💗 운영 8년 💗💗💗 💗 😆무약정 • 무명의 : 익명 • 유동 IP 😆에그 • 라우터 • 데이터심(U•ESIM) 😆LTE • 5G : 에그 • 라우터 최저가 행사 😆타업체 대비 성능 • 품질 문제 시, 환불
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 😆플레티넘 SIMIO eSIM(데이터 전용) eSIM(데이터전용)? 휴대폰 내부 기판에 있는 USIM으로 별도의 배송없이 간편하게 QR코드로 인식하여 결제 후 5분이내로 데이터 사용 및 충전이 가능합니다. 또한 기존 에그, 라우터와 같이 무명의, 무약정, 유동 IP로 우수한 보안성능을 가지고 있습니다. "eSIM은 고정IP라 위험하다?" eSIM 또한 유동 IP이고 일반 휴대폰 또한 유동 IP입니다. 동일한 보안, 비용은 더 합리적으로 (에그 약 21만 원 → eSIM 약 3만 원 약 7배 차이) 최상위 라인, 텔레그램 최저가로 안내드립니다. 무명의 · 무약정 · 유동 IP · VPN 3만원 최저가 지금 바로 시작하세요. 📱문의 : @SIMIO_global 📱24시간 개통 봇 : @SIMIOeSIM_bot
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 😆 플레티넘 😍 😍😍😍😍 😍 ✅ LG 모두의 원칩, KT 바로유심 취급 ✅ AS 보장 7일 - 기간 끝나도 일부로 해지 X ✅ TRC20(트론테더) 결제 ✅ 물량에 따른 개통 단가 조율 가능 ✅ LG,KT 선불 , KT 후불 가능 ✅ AS,예약 우선 개통 💗 문의 💗 채널
❤1
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 😅 다이아 🌈무지개 유심🌈 ➡️블루오션KBO , AMEX 공식 제휴업체 🌈 내국인 선불 유심 (막심은 따로 문의) 🌈 퀵,화물,씌우기 가능 🌈 명의자 정보 제공 🌈 AS 1달 보장 (스팸 정지시 AS❌) ⚠️ 장기간 사용 가능한 유심만 거래 합니다. ⚠️ 지속적으로 거래하실 대표님들 연락주세요^-^ ⬇️24시간 문의 환영⬇️ 📱 @rainbow_sim
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 🥹 에메랄드 무빙 선불유심⚫ 막심 요금포함 30만원 AS7일 😉😌😍🥰 😉😌😍🥰 😉😌😍🥰 🟢각종 본방 보증업체 🤣 ⚪비대면 씌우기 전문 ⚪내국인 막심 전문 ⚪인증업자 후불거래가능 ⚪AS 7일 개통후 완벽명의자관리 🔴24시 상담🔴 😀 🧄🧅🥔🍠 상담 @bs19771977 😀 🧄🧅🥔🍠 채널 @garp9292
🔥1,510🎉1,500❤🔥1,490👍1,480❤1,460🤩1,450💯1,440😍1,430
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 😆 플레티넘 ⭐️ 정심/막심 씌우기 판매 ⭐️ 정심/막심 내국인 외국인 ⭐️ AS30일 ⭐️ 정심 막심 유심 선불유심 선불폰 대포폰 📱 상담 문의: @afresh3253 📱 안내 채널: @afresh32530
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 🥹 에메랄드 명심(銘心) 선불유심⚫ 💎 KBO제휴 보증업체 💎 🟢각종 본방 보증거래 가능 💎여권자료 판매 ⚪비대면개통 / 전국 당일배송 ⚪외국인 정심/막심(무제한요금제) ⚪에그/라우터 전문 ⚪대량 문의 가격조정 ⚪인증업자 후불거래가능 ⚪대리점 코드 보유 🔴24시 상담문의cs🔴 ⚫@myungsim1119
❤2
🤣🥲🥲 😇🙂🙃 BEST업자 🔥🔥🔥 안녕하세요, 🥚🥚🥚 입니다❗️ 📢 에그 라우터 데이터심 ✔️ 첫달 요금무료 ✔️ 완전 무제한 요금제 ✔️ 만료일 전 빠른 연장 고객케어 ✔️ 당일배송 (퀵&화물) ✔️ 대량문의 (네고가능) 🥚🥚🥚 🔣 🥚🥚 🔣🥚🥚🥚 🤝 각종 본방 및 제휴 🥚🥚업자 🤝 블루오션 KBO 제휴업체 📱 @xoxo2727 📱
💎블루오션 등급 안내💎 🥹Platinum⤴️ 운영기간 6~12개월 😅Diamond⤴️운영기간 1~2년 😂Master⤴️ 운영기간 3년 🤣Grand ⤴️ 운영기간+자본금 ☺️Challenger ⤴️ 보증업체 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ BLUE OCEAN 블루오션은 텔레그램 커뮤니티를 기반으로 운영되는 정보 공유 공간입니다. 운영 기간과 활동 내역 등을 종합적으로 검토하여 신뢰도가 높은 업체를 선별해 소개하고 있으며, 이용자들이 보다 안전하게 정보를 확인할 수 있도록 노력하고 있습니다. 또한 업계 내 사기 피해 예방과 건전한 이용 문화 조성을 목표로 운영되며, 검증 시스템을 통해 신뢰할 수 있는 업체를 지속적으로 관리하고 있습니다. ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 블루오션은 운영 기간, 규모, 활동 이력 등을 종합적으로 평가하여 레벨 등급을 부여하며, 이용자가 오래…
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @KBOblue5_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 769,666 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“유심 라우터 통신 Premium채널” (@KBOblue5_com), 2,261 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KBOblue5_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.