Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 〞ᴋᴀʀʟɪ ᴅᴜʙ 〟

Channel

〞ᴋᴀʀʟɪ ᴅᴜʙ 〟

@KARLIdub

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004363609192
TypeChannel
Username@KARLIdub
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 12 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held10
On Telegramt.me/KARLIdub

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@KARLIdub was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@ozvyzki_Karli
held 13 September 2026 – 13 September 2026

Growth

13452912 September 2026 — 13 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24 subscribers27 September 2026 — 37 subscribers7 October 2026 — 41 subscribers14 October 2026 — 39 subscribers22 October 2026 — 38 subscribers28 October 2026 — 40 subscribers9 November 2026 — 45 subscribers9 November 2026 — 45 subscribers12 September 20269 November 2026
10 measurements spanning 59 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 19:5445no change
9 Nov 2026, 19:4745+5
28 Oct 2026, 13:4840+2
22 Oct 2026, 13:1738-1
14 Oct 2026, 15:0739-2
7 Oct 2026, 05:1641+4
27 Sept 2026, 01:3837+13
13 Sept 2026, 10:2224no change
13 Sept 2026, 09:4124+11
12 Sept 2026, 04:4713first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC3 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FLUTstudioPhoto

✧˚·̩̩̥͙˚̩̥̩̥·̩̩̥͙✧·̩̩̥͙˚̩̥̩̥˚·̩̩̥͙✧ ♡~Вжуххх~♡ Вᥲɯᥲ᧘ ᧘юδᥙʍᥲя ρ᧐᧘ь ɜᥲняᴛᥲ? Вы нᥱ уᥰᥱ᧘ᥙ нᥲ κᥴᴛᥙнᴦ? Вᥲᥴ нᥱ ᥰρᥙня᧘ᥙ? 🦋Нᥱ δᥱдᥲ!!!🦋 𐌿ρᥙх᧐дᥙ ᥴюдᥲ, ʙ нᥲɯу ᥴᴛудᥙю ᧐ɜʙучκᥙ FLUT studio! Мы ᴛ᧐᧘ьκ᧐ Нᥱдᥲʙн᧐ ᧐ᴛκы᧘ыᥴь, ᥰ᧐϶ᴛ᧐ʍу ʍ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ɜᥲх᧐дᥙᴛь κ нᥲʍ, ᥰρᥙнᥙʍᥲᥱʍ ʙᥴᥱх!!!🌺 ♡♡Ждёʍ ᥙʍᥱнн᧐ ᴛᥱδя♡♡ 𐌿ρ᧐϶κᴛы κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρыᥱ ʍы ɜᥲнᥙʍᥲᥱʍᥴя: Удᥙʙᥙᴛᥱ᧘ьныᥔ цᥙɸρ᧐ʙ᧐ᥔ цᥙρκ Мᥙρ дᥱндᥙ Адᥴκᥙᥔ δ᧐ᥴᥴ Дρ᧐ны уδᥙцы Тыκᥲᥔ ✧˚·̩̩̥͙˚̩̥̩̥…

13 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC8 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @TGstars_CONFPhoto

ㅤ★ 𝐓 𝐄 𝐋 𝐄 𝐆 𝐑 𝐀 𝐌 𝐒 𝐓 𝐀 𝐑 𝐒 ★ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ HI, в этом канале ты сможешь без стыда попросить телеграм-звезд .ᐟ ━━━━━━━━━ owners @dylana_dill_yey @Batrak_yey ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍

13 Sept 2026, 09:52 UTC6 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @pwriiiPlay

🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 🤩 . ݁₊🎁 ⊹ . ݁ ⟡ ݁ . ⊹ 💎₊ ݁. All Char’s games — канал, объединяющий в себя игры во многие плейсы в роблоксе. Здесь, вы сможете найти хорошую команду или просто повеселиться с людьми в какой нибудь игре.

13 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC9 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @Starlite_games_goPhoto

⏜︵ ˖  ִ 𓈒𓏼‌ ‌‎  𓏏𓏏 ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ‌▪️𝒕 • ৎ 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕︎︎ ᅠᅠׅ ‌‌꒱꒱ [🤩] - ▪️очешь найти тгк по играм в 𝑫𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒚'𝒔 𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅? Тогда тебе точно к нам! 🤩🤩ᵋ🍬ʚ ᧔👣᧓ ɞ🎀ᵌ🤩🤩 ▪️𝒆𝒍𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒕𝒐.. ៹ 𓏸⃘ 𝆹𝅥 𝆭 🈀 ࿚ ▪️𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒆 ༏‌𓐇˚𝂅ׄ ᓯ ‌ ‌ 𝂅ׄ ⣿ ִ۫ ˖   ⏜︵ ▪️𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 ▪️𝒐 ‌‌𓏼݄ ִ۫ 𓏏𓏏 ˖ ׁ ׅ 𐔌 ᚔ .࣪ ˖   ִ  . 𓈒𓏼‌ ‌‎ 𓏏𓏏

13 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC13 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @music_confessionPhoto

Помогите подобрать музыку под профиль!... Услышала такую крутую песню в эдите, но в комментариях никто не знает названия!... Помогите найти... Оцените мой плейлист! ⎯ׅ⎯𖹭 ۫ ִ. Если у вас были подобные проблемы, то вы по адресу! Доброе пожаловать в "музыка кф", кф в котором вы можете попросить людей помочь вам найти ту или иную песню которая вам понравилась, или просто оценить вашу любимую группу/песню и тд. Так же еж…

13 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC15 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @IMMORTALmanCONFESSIONPhoto

🤎🤎🤎 😌очему все 📚 🤎🤎🤎 🔤олчат о 🤎🤎🤎 🔤ессмертном? 🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🏳 🎼 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🙂💭 🤩 💭 cr: Birdyyyyyy64 бот для тейков ▎ вп пост(0+)

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @KARLIdub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“〞ᴋᴀʀʟɪ ᴅᴜʙ 〟” (@KARLIdub), 45 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KARLIdub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.