Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

>KAIN || Cosplay<(любитель GAYmbling и не только…)>

@KAINCOSP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002473991149
TypeChannel
Username@KAINCOSP
Description"Без рычага в казик не поиграешь, магические клинки не по собираешь, а также одержимым екаем не станешь" Косплеер из спб, творю и страдаю ххххахазсх! Извините, спамлю музыкой и пою) Анонимка: https://t.me/askrubot?start=6903408270 Лс: @Kain_and_Avil
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/KAINCOSP

Growth

2326 Aug 2026, 18:19 — 232 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:47 — 232 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:197 Aug 2026, 02:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:47232no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:19232first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.3%
avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
Avg views / post
100
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,104
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,710
Videos
163
Links
267

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53367910619498524034837.8%
❤‍🔥2721.3%
1814.2%
custom 5440890885837433451107.87%
🎉86.30%
💯75.51%
👍43.15%
🤬32.36%
🫡21.57%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KAINCOSP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC63 views6 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Все сказано за меня! #среда

custom 53367910619498524036

5 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC49 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bocchi_the_photoPhoto

Это среда, мои чуваки! Когда картинки не нашлось, а вот идея нашлась!) Одевала нейронка. KAIN и Bocchi в кадре 🐸

custom 533679106194985240311💯7🎉5

4 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC86 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Аникон день 1 (И единственный) Вообщем, к счастью было не так душно как в прошлом году! Что без условно было огромным плюсом с моим костюмом и гримом! Выступили ну просто великолепно! образы, отыгрыши и прочее было на высоте!!!! Мы блистали и это было мое первое такое настолько крупное выступление ! К сожалению по итогу мы ничего не взяли, но да ладно!) Мы получили кучу эмоций, а также зрительские симпатии! Absol

custom 533679106194985240313custom 54408908858374334514❤‍🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC98 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ааааа, скока контента… Надо разгребать!

❤‍🔥6

2 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC117 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пупупу…

custom 533679106194985240313🤬3custom 54408908858374334513❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC111 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freakazoid03_13Video

Утерянная VHS Звёздный гость: https://t.me/cospknot6sic6

custom 54408908858374334513custom 53367910619498524032

1 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC111 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cospknot6sic6Photo

НЕ ВОЛНУЙТЕСЬ! Мы немного отдыхали и теперь возвращаемся🔥 Контента много и будет ещё больше. Ожидаем разъëб🖤

❤‍🔥107🎉3

31 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC134 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mozgoedovna_APhoto

🌙

11custom 53367910619498524033❤‍🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC116 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎧 Нажми, чтобы найти песню

❤‍🔥2🫡2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @KAINCOSP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 125,798 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“>KAIN || Cosplay<(любитель GAYmbling и не только…)>” (@KAINCOSP), 232 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KAINCOSP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.