Channel
@K391WT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,092subscribers
+166 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001951355030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @K391WT |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/K391WT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 3,092 | +120 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 2,972 | +46 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 2,926 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (23 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,302 |
| Reactions total | 519 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
519 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5397780589690503953 | 195 | 37.6% | |
| custom 5282791700857649471 | 166 | 32.0% | |
| custom 5438651708932641550 | 158 | 30.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
РОЗЫГРЫШ 🎁 и снова дарим вам ништяки за подписку! ЦЕЛЫХ 5 призовых мест ⚡️ условия: быть подписанным на нас: @K391WT @slovno_kleymo1 @tsypa_official обязательно нажать кнопку «участвую» 💪🏻 Участников: 101 Призовых мест: 5 Дата розыгрыша: 22:00, 01.09.2026 MSK (7 дней)
custom 53977805896905039537custom 52827917008576494713
ну пиздец вы тормозы конечно
custom 539778058969050395317custom 52827917008576494716
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 539778058969050395316custom 52827917008576494718custom 54386517089326415507
розыгрыш делаем? реакций максимум 💨
custom 539778058969050395343custom 528279170085764947113custom 54386517089326415509
лан че ебало топить как говорится, поплакали покакали дальше живем, новости будут вам расскажу) но очень не хочу я если честно это рассказывать 😀
custom 543865170893264155016custom 52827917008576494717
никогда нахуй не вкладываетесь в автоваз просто послушайте человека кто в этом варится уже 4 года вы не представляете какая это дичайшая инвестиция в гавно если бы я знала, что мне предстоит такой путь с ней, я бы продала ее в первые полгода 😁
custom 539778058969050395324custom 543865170893264155011
21 векк 🥀
custom 528279170085764947124custom 54386517089326415504
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528279170085764947127custom 54386517089326415504custom 53977805896905039532
не хочу щас искать дохуя чего, просто один момент вот покажу чувак 3 года назад въебал мне бочину пока она на парковке стояла, после этого начались сильные проблемы с зазором на водительской двери соответственно это все уже влияет на общую картину, а я раньше об этом вообще даже не задумывалась да и когда она черная была это не так видно было 🫠
custom 528279170085764947114custom 539778058969050395311
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528279170085764947112custom 53977805896905039536
15.000₽ зарядили за зазоры на морде все почему-то в ахуе с этой цены с кем в лс обсуждали, но в комментах вы так и пишите +/- Андрей на чирибасе первый угадал 😂 говорит, что меня опять наебывают…..
custom 543865170893264155015
ездила к ребятам, смотрели мне зазоры кто-нибудь угадает ценник, сколько стоить будет все выставить? (морда выходит полностью разбирается)
custom 543865170893264155017custom 52827917008576494715custom 53977805896905039532
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @K391WT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 874,825 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐤𝐬𝐚𝐰𝐭𝟏” (@K391WT), 3,092 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/K391WT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.