Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Julia Khadartseva| Family Constellations

Channel

Julia Khadartseva| Family Constellations

@Julia_Khadartseva_constellations

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002675539952
TypeChannel
Username@Julia_Khadartseva_constellations
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Julia_Khadartseva_constellations

Growth

3674559 September 2026 — 36 subscribers11 September 2026 — 59 subscribers11 September 2026 — 59 subscribers18 September 2026 — 74 subscribers9 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:1974+15
11 Sept 2026, 07:2259no change
11 Sept 2026, 06:0159+23
9 Sept 2026, 01:1736first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.4%
avg views ÷ 74 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held20 (4 September 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total1,294
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😡1456.0%
❤832.0%
🥰28.00%
👍14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 04:15 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Hungry Thursday Every Thursday I do a dry fast — once a week. Today is the third Thursday out of sixteen. Thursday belongs to Jupiter. A day of expansion, a day of money, a day of big doors. That's exactly why a post on this day isn't about food. It's about what you're clearing space for. Autophagy. In 2016, the Nobel Prize was given for discovering this mechanism. A cell, left without food from outside, starts so…

❤1

9 Sept 2026, 20:00 UTC28 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥 Sexual energy is the energy of life. It gives not only pleasure. It gives the ability to create, to want life, and to keep living. The same force that gives rise to attraction gives rise to inspiration — in work, in creativity, in relationships. It's the same energy. Just different expressions of it. That's why it's so important to learn how to handle it — not suppress it, not be ashamed of it, but direct it. T…

9 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC30 viewsread 11 September 2026

This story about Tamara and David — we pulled it from the family system level during a supervision session with my students, when they were constellating me. In this lineage, going into relationships across different nationalities was bad. Like Romeo and Juliet, for example. But sometimes legends were born from such unions. You know what else I love about constellations: working at the family system and karmic level…

9 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC39 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

When one decision gives birth to an entire era Georgia holds the story of the legendary Queen Tamar — a story about a choice that changed the system. Her first marriage was imposed by the will of the court, not by the heart, and it became destruction: a system built on "should" inevitably cracks. The divorce was not a scandal but an act of inner honesty — a brave step against pressure, to reclaim her right to life …

8 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTC141 views11 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Welcome and Good luck ♥️

❤7🥰2👍1😡1

8 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC141 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

My client: I was at that constellation too. I wanted to speak up too. My husband is going as a volunteer to the war for the second time. The first time he was preparing to go, I fought with him a lot before that. Our relationship got as bad as it could get. I was scared too, and I tried to hide him behind me. I remember when mobilization was announced, I told my husband to sit at home, I'd go wherever needed mysel…

😡1

8 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Study this great work. There is a film with the same name about the Great Battle. There is much depth in it, and answers to all questions. And for a Woman, there is also much there about how all wars, and their beginning, are disrespect toward the Woman. Which we, you and I, can also regulate, by working with our own value.

😡1

8 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Karma and action without attachment The Gita teaches that a person has a right only to action, not to its fruits — one should not act for the sake of a result, nor abstain from action. This frees a person from karmic consequences: action performed as the fulfillment of duty, without selfish craving for the fruit, does not bind the soul. War as the tragedy of dharma, not a triumph Important: the Mahabharata does no…

😡1

8 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Dharma above all The main motif of the epic — dharma (duty, law, the order of the universe) stands above personal attachments, benefit, even family feelings. When Arjuna on the battlefield of Kurukshetra refuses to fight against his teachers and relatives, Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita (part of the Mahabharata) convinces him: what matters is not whether the action is pleasant, but whether it corresponds to your svadh…

😡1

8 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Not a simple topic she raised ♥️ love and peace to all, the main thing is in the heart. And don't forget, all of this is only your projection of world or war. All of it is only our quantum source of reality. And only you decide, in your reality — a man hides behind a woman's skirt, runs, provides, respects, loves, believes, creates, fights, attacks … everything you want exists in your world, and from your world you t…

😡1

8 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC64 viewsread 11 September 2026

The outcome is the same for everyone - we will all die. The question is: in what energies. And how long will we be remembered. And whether we will be thanked or cursed, our graves dug up. ♥️🤍 And how the family system will go on living in those energies afterward.

8 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

And you know … I see men who ran away. I see every day how they live. Afraid. Without money, without happiness. Afraid to go out to the shop, because they'll be taken … life as fear. And I see how we are proud of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers - because once they became Heroes of the Great Patriotic War and won!!! Several generations walk with a strong spine, because they are HEROES! And you are either a c…

😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Julia_Khadartseva_constellations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Julia Khadartseva| Family Constellations” (@Julia_Khadartseva_constellations), 74 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Julia_Khadartseva_constellations.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.