Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL

Channel

JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL

@JudicialReviewSA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

527subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001536205278
TypeChannel
Username@JudicialReviewSA
Created2 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JudicialReviewSA

Growth

527530528.57 August 2026 — 530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 530 subscribers13 August 2026 — 527 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 527–530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:26527-3
7 Aug 2026, 15:01530no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:17530first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

276 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14251.4%
👍9835.5%
🙏165.80%
🔥155.43%
👏41.45%
🥰10.362%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2023 to 18 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2025, 11:31 UTC410 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The fight for our rights on personal decision making continues. Have a look at the resources, webinars and videos highlighting this issue and what you can do to practically make a difference. Time is running out. The Aligned Council is doing some great work to shine a light on the facts.

👍2

18 Apr 2025, 11:31 UTC458 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alignedcouncilofaustraliaPhoto

Now is the time to tell our Candidates in the upcoming election that the 2024 International Health Regulations (IHRs) are an ELECTION ISSUE. Click below to learn why the Aligned Council of Australia rejects the IHRs, and to find flyers to print to deliver in your local area, display in your place of work, or use as a talking point when discussing with family and friends. Like a flyer less wordy or more wordy, darker

👍6

13 Dec 2024, 08:38 UTCviews —

JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL pinned «HUGE NEWS 💥- Dr Bay Victory! Congratulations Dr William Bay who today (13/12/24) won his case in the Queensland Supreme Court. Although this case related much to the nefarious actions of the AMA and AHPRA it is a win for those who have the courage to speak…»

13 Dec 2024, 08:37 UTC≈1,120 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

HUGE NEWS 💥- Dr Bay Victory! Congratulations Dr William Bay who today (13/12/24) won his case in the Queensland Supreme Court. Although this case related much to the nefarious actions of the AMA and AHPRA it is a win for those who have the courage to speak up for people and their right to information and safety about medical practices. Case quote; “Each notification was about Dr Bay’s conduct at political meetings,

30👍8

28 Nov 2024, 11:26 UTC584 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProfPetrovsky

This does beg the question of, if the Appeal wins then will Malinauskas and Picton tender their resignations, along with the CEOs of SA Health and the local health networks who all pushed through this mandate and the staff terminations, just as Alan Joyce and the board were forced to do at Qantas when they were found to have acted unlawfully? Could Kerrie Freeman, the CEO of SALHN until last week, have seen the writi

12🔥6🙏3👍2

28 Nov 2024, 11:26 UTC433 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProfPetrovsky

I do have Nik working on the information - however in the meantime: Yesterday the appeal of the SA Health vaccine mandates in the SA Employment tribunal (the Teague case) was heard. This was an appeal of the same case in which Prof Petrovsky gave expert evidence, triggering SA Health to target him and set out in concert with Flinders University to destroy him and his vaccine research team. For those who don't kno

13👍6🙏2

24 Aug 2024, 01:57 UTCviews —

JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL pinned «CV19 by the numbers Dear reader… I recently asked the Minister representing the Minister for Health and Aged Care in the Senate the following question: “Since 1 January 2020, how many Australians between the ages of 2 and 50, with no comorbidity or serious…»

24 Aug 2024, 01:57 UTC736 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

CV19 by the numbers Dear reader… I recently asked the Minister representing the Minister for Health and Aged Care in the Senate the following question: “Since 1 January 2020, how many Australians between the ages of 2 and 50, with no comorbidity or serious underlying health condition, have died from COVID-19?” Here is the answer provided: “The ABS mortality data records the cause of death as certified by the doctor

👍144🙏1

14 Jul 2024, 07:48 UTCviews —

JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL pinned «Invictus BY WILLIAM ERNEST HENLEY Out of the night that covers me, Black as the pit from pole to pole, I thank whatever gods may be For my unconquerable soul. In the fell clutch of circumstance I have not winced nor cried aloud. Under…»

14 Jul 2024, 07:47 UTC779 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Invictus BY WILLIAM ERNEST HENLEY Out of the night that covers me, Black as the pit from pole to pole, I thank whatever gods may be For my unconquerable soul. In the fell clutch of circumstance I have not winced nor cried aloud. Under the bludgeonings of chance My head is bloody, but unbowed. Beyond this place of wrath and tears Looms but the Horror of the shade, And yet the menace o

8👏2🔥1🥰1🙏1

5 May 2024, 03:49 UTCviews —

JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL pinned «Professor Petrovsky was a significant witness in the Judicial Review into South Australia Directions to vaccinate during 2021/22 - and also for other cases around Australia. His SA testimony can be read in previous links to this channel. You can judge for…»

5 May 2024, 03:49 UTC889 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Professor Petrovsky was a significant witness in the Judicial Review into South Australia Directions to vaccinate during 2021/22 - and also for other cases around Australia. His SA testimony can be read in previous links to this channel. You can judge for yourself as to the caliber of his expertise (certainly against that of the Crown’s witness). What you also need to understand is, that the vaccine development commu

👍6🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JudicialReviewSA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JUDICIAL REVIEW (SA) OFFICIAL” (@JudicialReviewSA), 527 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JudicialReviewSA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.