2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 08:30
114
no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:19
114
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
139.6%
avg views ÷ 114 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
17 (29 April 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
796
Reactions total
61
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
61
33.3%
👍
46
25.1%
🔥
42
23.0%
🏆
10
5.46%
❤
9
4.92%
🫡
5
2.73%
👏
3
1.64%
🕊
2
1.09%
⚡
1
0.546%
🎉
1
0.546%
👀
1
0.546%
💯
1
0.546%
🤣
1
0.546%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Avvallari biror sohada maslahat kerak bo‘lsa, eng qiyin savol shu edi:
“Kimdan so‘rayman?” 🤔
Chunki haqiqiy tajribaga ega insonlarning hammasi ham ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda faol emas. Ba’zilarini topish qiyin, topsangiz ham ular bilan bog‘lanish undan ham qiyin.
Shunda bir fikr paydo bo‘ldi: 🤞
Nega ularni bir joyga jamlamaymiz?
Siz o‘zingizga kerakli insonni topasiz, uning bo‘sh vaqtini tanlaysiz va 1:1 suhbatda bevosi…
- Seni ko'proq nima qiynaydi?
- ITni yangi o'rganuvchilarga mentor bo'lish
Hayotimda bu darajada qiynalmagan bo'lsam kerak. Ba'zida boshlovchilar bilan ishlash oson deyishadi, lekin tajribam unday demaydi hech qachon...
Lekin ma'lum muddatdan so'ng "Aka ishga kirdim sizga raxmat" deyishsa mendan hursand odam yo'q. Shuni o'zi qiyinchilikka ko'z yumishga arziydi)
MIT guruhlariga Candidatelarni qabul qilishda yuzma yuz (zoom orqali) suhbatlashib ularni sinovdan o'tkizamiz. Meni hayron qoldirgan jarayon nega birinchi marta ko'rayotgan insonimizga qovoqlarimizni solib, hayotdan hafa va meni kerak bo'lsa o'tkizib yuboring degan yuz ifoda bilan qarab turamiz. Albatta hamma ham unday emas lekin 10 kishidan kamida 5/6/7 kishi shunday bo'lib chiqadi. Birinchi tasurot juda muhim. Agar…
Codexda SubAgentlarni test qilib o'tirgandim.
Xosil qilgan subAgentlarimiz English Teacher, Student, Inspector.
Teacher: Ingliz tilini o'rgatadi.
Student: Ingliz tilini Teacherdan o'rganadi.
Inspector: Teacher va Studentni doim nazorat qilib turadi. Metodikada yoki o'rganishda sustlashishni sezib qolsa ularga dakki beradi.
Eng qizig'i Student xuddi odamlardek ba'zida charchab qolyapti va Inspector uni kamchiligin…
har kuni yangi g'oya paydo bo'ladi va shu vaqtda tezda o'sha g'oyani amalga oshirishga harakat qilmayman.
Oldin tezda hissiyotga berilib qilishga harakat qilardim va ancha vaqtimni ajratgandan keyin project tugaydi. undan so'ng biror kimga ko'rsatsangiz "nega kerak" degan savol berishadi va siz qottingiz 😁️️️️️️
Siz yangi g'oya topsangiz uni kerak yoki kerak emasligini va ishlash, ishlamasligini, qilish kerak yoki y…
Boshlanishda yo‘l-yo‘riq zarur!
Boshqa sohalarda bo‘lgani kabi, IT sohasida ham yo‘l ko‘rsatuvchi Mentor (Ustoz) muhim rol o‘ynaydi.
"Internetda ma'lumotlar juda ko‘p, sun'iy intellekt ham rivojlangan bir paytda nega mentor kerak?" degan savol ko‘pchilikning xayoliga keladi.
Keling, o‘ylab ko‘raylik:
• Internetdagi ma'lumotlarning qanchasi sizga haqiqatan ham foydali?
• Kerakli va keraksiz ma'lumotni ajratib oli…
vibe coding yaxshi, fundamental bilimingiz bo'lsa. bo'lmasa siz uchun minuslar olib kelishi mumkin.
Hozirgi kunda AI bor-ku, Coding o'rganib nima qilaman deyish bu sal g'alati eshitiladi.
Gap isboti bilan yuqorida men kirgan oddiy website, va buni admin pagega borish uchun 2 daqiqa ham ketmadi, nega chunki AI qanday code yozishini bilaman, unga tushuntirilmasa qilmasligini ham bilaman.
Dasturlashni endi boshlaganl…
👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @JonibekBoronov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,104,862 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jonibek Bo'ronov” (@JonibekBoronov), 114 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JonibekBoronov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
