Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗАКРЫТˏˋ°•*⁀➷ j𐔖ᥒᥲthᥲᥒ b𐔤ᥱr᥉.|ⲇⲏᥱⲃⲏυⲕ ⋆.ೃ࿔*:・(Анастасия)

@JonathanByersNote

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003632347258
TypeChannel
Username@JonathanByersNote
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 6 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/JonathanByersNote

Growth

4114 Aug 2026, 11:17 — 41 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 11:31 — 41 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 11:1714 Aug 2026, 11:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:3141no change
14 Aug 2026, 11:1741first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
71
Videos
3
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52807361595745542852150.0%
custom 5397935118318859667716.7%
custom 537089154750194956049.52%
custom 537091285483470833549.52%
custom 527822112121529491937.14%
custom 536879526845405311524.76%
custom 528518628256412214612.38%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jan 2026, 17:50 UTC238 viewsread 14 August 2026

У меня сейчас нету желания вести дневники🌟 но возможно через неделю сделаю

19 Jan 2026, 16:08 UTC298 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Какой перс из ивк?

  1. Нам Гю(124)38%
  2. Мин Су(125)6%
  3. Дэ Хо(388)16%
  4. Ин Хо чтооо.(001/фронтмен)12%
  5. Джун Хо16%
  6. Вербовщик8%
  7. only Jonathan52%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jan 2026, 16:06 UTC222 viewsread 14 August 2026

итоги получается Джонатан и кто-то из ивк 🔇🔇 давайте опрос на перса из ивк чтолл.

19 Jan 2026, 11:29 UTC207 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Еще один Короче первые два места будут,т.е. два дневника дааа

  1. Джонатан68%
  2. Ивк47%
  3. Alien stage32%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jan 2026, 02:06 UTC185 viewsread 14 August 2026

что будет если я уберу вариант джонатана

18 Jan 2026, 21:12 UTC172 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Давайте короче выбирайте дневник следующий у меня опять вдохновение появилось

  1. Джонатан Байээээrrrrс63%
  2. Игра в кальмара кто-нибудь3%
  3. Робин баклашка7%
  4. Буратино10%
  5. Элиен стейдж чтооо(я просто увидел дневник Мизи мне понравилось)13%
  6. Из осд,но ктото другой короче в коммы напишите кто3%
  7. Из оно ктотт0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jan 2026, 23:55 UTC151 viewsread 14 August 2026

а еще мне было лень очень вести там что-то

17 Jan 2026, 23:55 UTC159 viewsread 14 August 2026

всем привет есть шанс что я вернусь🥺потому что я научился делать баннеры вроде

6 Jan 2026, 20:34 UTC282 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://t.me/+SgWCUmuABf9lNjUy Не удивляйтесь что канал частный

6 Jan 2026, 20:29 UTC282 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026

я наверн могу создать щп канал если интересно

custom 52807361595745542856custom 53709128548347083354custom 52782211212152949193custom 52851862825641221461custom 53708915475019495601

6 Jan 2026, 20:28 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «ЗАКРЫТˏˋ°•*⁀➷ j𐔖ᥒᥲthᥲᥒ b𐔤ᥱr᥉.|ⲇⲏᥱⲃⲏυⲕ ⋆.ೃ࿔*:・(Анастасия)»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JonathanByersNote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jan 2026, 16:08 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Какой перс из ивк?

  1. Нам Гю(124)38%
  2. Мин Су(125)6%
  3. Дэ Хо(388)16%
  4. Ин Хо чтооо.(001/фронтмен)12%
  5. Джун Хо16%
  6. Вербовщик8%
  7. only Jonathan52%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jan 2026, 11:29 UTCFinal Results19 voters

Еще один Короче первые два места будут,т.е. два дневника дааа

  1. Джонатан68%
  2. Ивк47%
  3. Alien stage32%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Jan 2026, 21:12 UTCFinal Results30 voters

Давайте короче выбирайте дневник следующий у меня опять вдохновение появилось

  1. Джонатан Байээээrrrrс63%
  2. Игра в кальмара кто-нибудь3%
  3. Робин баклашка7%
  4. Буратино10%
  5. Элиен стейдж чтооо(я просто увидел дневник Мизи мне понравилось)13%
  6. Из осд,но ктото другой короче в коммы напишите кто3%
  7. Из оно ктотт0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 3 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАКРЫТˏˋ°•*⁀➷ j𐔖ᥒᥲthᥲᥒ b𐔤ᥱr᥉.|ⲇⲏᥱⲃⲏυⲕ ⋆.ೃ࿔*:・(Анастасия)” (@JonathanByersNote), 41 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JonathanByersNote.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.