Channel
@JohnMezd_cf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003579511602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JohnMezd_cf |
| Description | Бот для тейков:: @JohnMezdCF_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JohnMezd_cf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 71 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 71 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (4 October 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 363 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
78 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5391206223120986738 | 15 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5427133895134976855 | 14 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5336811862476485482 | 13 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5384566663242854099 | 12 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5211129157911596185 | 9 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5339552098855984916 | 8 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5296769822246331091 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| custom 5274122846241568930 | 2 | 2.56% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. . .zZz —Бля,очередная говяная новелла. —Да как же заебали дарки,что лезут в творчество со своими новеллами. —Сука,да что не так с людьми,что они решили сделать такое 𖩩꙼ ۪ Знᥲκ᧐ⲙыᥱ ⲙыᥴ᧘ᥙ?Т᧐ᴦдᥲ 𝓦𝓮𝓵𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸... ❤🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 𓈒 𓆩 Здесь вы можете свободно высказаться насчёт любой неадекватной новеллы𓂃 ꒱ ८ ୧ Админ состав :: ᢉ𐭩 ׄ ݃Влд—Нелли[💮],она/её ᢉ𐭩 ׄ ݃Админ—Маньё[☕️☕️],любые мест…
Signed СуЧара
🍼 джонмирцы кф 🍼 бот картинки от которых мне вайбит джомирцами надеюсь такое можно отправлять #тейк
custom 52967698222463310915custom 53912062231209867383custom 54271338951349768553
Signed ”ⲣυⲥⲁ #
Хэдканоны на джомирцев! Эти два дурня в рандомный момент могут начать умничать и спорить с друг другом. Проигрывает тот у кого закончатся аргументы,оскорбления и ТД. Эти два дурачка по разному проявляют Любовь. Если Джон её проявляет любовь,через мягкие оскорбления(балбесина,идиот и ТД.) то Междумирец проявляет любовь через тактильность.(Может приобнять слегка,облокотиться на плечо и так можно перечислять до бескон…
custom 53368118624764854824custom 53912062231209867384custom 52111291579115961852custom 53395520988559849162custom 52741228462415689301custom 54271338951349768551
Signed СуЧара
❤ :: не стесняйтесь, мы не кусаемся
custom 53395520988559849162
Signed ”ⲣυⲥⲁ #
🩸 — любимые наши подписчики, поговоря с вами в комментах, я вспомнил, что люблю заниматься покадровой анимацией и вообще я гачер, так что я готов сделать коротенькую реакцию, (можно посмотреть пример моей работы🌟), если хотите, чтобы я не забил на эту идею, можете накидать тейков🌟 хэдканоны/зарисовки/артики/эдиты🥰🥰
custom 53912062231209867385custom 52111291579115961853custom 53368118624764854823
Signed СуЧара
🩸 — Может, вы хотите отправить тейк в этот прекрасный кф?? Стикеры, кстати, в стадии создания 🤩🤩
custom 52111291579115961854custom 53368118624764854823
Signed СуЧара
Posted without readable text
Signed СуЧара
🩸 — любимые подписчики, как лучше выглядит 1 или 2 вариант???
custom 54271338951349768554
Signed СуЧара
🩸 — 🤩🤩🤩🤩
custom 53395520988559849164custom 53368118624764854822custom 54271338951349768552custom 53912062231209867381
Signed СуЧара
🩸 — набираем 10 "🤍", и я делаю стикерпак с Джонмирцами🇺🇦
custom 538456666324285409912custom 54271338951349768554custom 53912062231209867382custom 52741228462415689301custom 53368118624764854821
Signed СуЧара
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @JohnMezd_cf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“джонмирцы кф” (@JohnMezd_cf), 71 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JohnMezd_cf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.