29 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «[the best you ever had, but this is the END] K͟͟r͟͟a͟͟m͟͟e͟͟r͟͟.»
![Telegram profile photo for [the best you ever had, but this is the END] K͟͟r͟͟a͟͟m͟͟e͟͟r͟͟.](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/73/730557c4be9516d011911e9beb2d377071972bf0288fdff5d1f835bfc05631fc.jpg)
Channel
[the best you ever had, but this is the END] K͟͟r͟͟a͟͟m͟͟e͟͟r͟͟.
@JohnKramer_SAWNET
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004455765830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JohnKramer_SAWNET |
| Description | цᴇниᴛᴇ дᴀннᴏᴇ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 4 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JohnKramer_SAWNET |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 11 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 403.4%
- avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 44.4
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 355 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
24 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC57 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 〰 〰 📍🛜 🧩 ᴄᴩᴇди ᴛᴀᴋих ᴨᴀциᴇнᴛᴏʙ ᴇдʙᴀ ᴧи ᴇᴄᴛь ᴨᴏ-нᴀᴄᴛᴏящᴇʍу быʙɯиᴇ. ᴄᴨᴩᴏᴄи ᴇё, ʍᴏжᴇᴛ ᴏнᴀ и ᴄᴀʍᴀ нᴇ ᴨᴩᴏчь ᴨᴩиᴇхᴀᴛь цᴇню ᴛʙᴏй ʙᴋᴧᴀд, нᴏ ᴋʙᴀᴧиɸициᴩᴏʙᴀнный ʙɜᴦᴧяд нᴀ ʍᴇня, ᴇщё и нᴇ ᴄʙяɜᴀнный ᴄ ᴨᴩяʍыʍ ᴩиᴄᴋᴏʍ дᴧя жиɜни, ниᴋᴏʍу нᴇ ᴨᴏйдёᴛ нᴀ ʙᴩᴇд. ᴛᴀᴋ чᴛᴏ ʍᴏжᴇɯь ᴨᴇᴩᴇдᴀᴛь ᴇй ʙʍᴇᴄ…
24 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC48 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 〰 〰 💬📍 🧩 дᴀжᴇ ᴇᴄᴧи ᴏнᴀ ᴄᴀʍᴀ — дᴏʙᴇᴩᴇннᴏᴇ ᴧицᴏ дᴧя ᴛᴇбя, будь нᴀчᴇᴋу. ᴏб ϶ᴛᴏʍ ʍᴏᴦуᴛ ᴨᴩᴏɜнᴀᴛь ɸᴇдᴇᴩᴀᴧы. иᴧи ᴨᴏᴧиция ᴄᴀʍᴀ ᴏнᴀ ʍᴏжᴇᴛ и нᴇ хᴏᴛᴇᴛь ᴨᴩичиниᴛь ᴛᴇбᴇ ʙᴩᴇдᴀ. нᴏ ᴨᴏ нᴇй ᴧᴇᴦчᴇ ʙыйᴛи нᴀ ᴛᴇбя. будьᴛᴇ ᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩиᴛᴇᴧьны, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ᴛы ᴩядᴏʍ ᴄ нᴇй ʙидиʍᴏ, ᴏнᴀ ᴏᴋᴀɜᴀᴧ…
24 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC38 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 〰 〰 📎👥 🧩 нᴇужᴇᴧи дᴏᴋᴛᴏᴩ Дᴇнᴧᴏн ʍᴇняᴇᴛ ᴛʙᴏё ʙᴏᴄᴨᴩияᴛиᴇ бᴏᴧьɯᴇ, чᴇʍ ʙᴄё дᴏ ϶ᴛᴏᴦᴏ... удиʙиᴛᴇᴧьнᴏ. Сᴇᴄᴄиᴧ ʙыɜыʙᴀᴧ ʙ ᴛᴇбᴇ дᴇᴦᴩᴀдᴀцию, ᴀ ᴛʙᴏя Линн ᴧиɯь ᴄᴨᴏᴄᴏбᴄᴛʙуᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴏᴦᴩᴇᴄᴄу. ʙᴏɜʍᴏжнᴏ, ʙиɜиᴛы ᴋ нᴇй нᴇ ᴄᴛᴏᴧь уж и ʙᴏ ʙᴩᴇд ʙᴄё ᴨᴩᴏиᴄхᴏдиᴛ нᴇ ᴛᴀᴋ, ᴋᴀᴋ ʍᴏжнᴏ быᴧᴏ…
24 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC38 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 〰 〰 ⛓️💬 🧩 Нᴇᴧьᴄᴏн. Лᴏᴦᴀн Нᴇᴧьᴄᴏн, ᴨᴧᴏдящий ᴏɯибᴋу ɜᴀ ᴏɯибᴋᴏй, чᴛᴏ жᴇ иʍᴇннᴏ ᴏн ᴨᴏᴧучиᴛ ɜᴀ ʙᴄю ᴄʙᴏю нᴇдᴏᴄᴛᴀᴛᴏчнᴏᴄᴛь, ɜᴀ ʙᴄё ᴄʙᴏё нᴇᴨᴏниʍᴀниᴇ? ᴋᴀᴋᴏʙ жᴇ будᴇᴛ ᴇᴦᴏ ɯᴀнᴄ? ᴩʙᴀнᴏ и дёᴩᴦᴀнᴏ ʙ дʙижᴇнии ᴋᴀᴩᴀндᴀɯᴀ идᴇᴀᴧьнᴏй ɜᴀᴛᴏчᴋи, ʙ ϶ᴛᴏй бᴇᴄᴨᴏдᴏбнᴏ ʙыʙᴇᴩᴇннᴏй ɯᴛᴩихᴏʙᴋᴇ ᴛᴇᴨᴇᴩь ɜᴀᴋᴧючᴀᴇᴛᴄя ʙ…
20 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC46 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 〰 〰 ɜᴀʍᴇᴛиᴧ, чᴛᴏ ᴄᴄыᴧᴋᴀ нᴀ ᴨᴏддᴇᴩжᴋу ᴨᴇᴩᴇᴄᴛᴀᴧᴀ быᴛь ʙᴀᴧиднᴏй, нᴏ чᴛᴏ жᴇ. ᴇᴄᴧи ᴋᴏʍу-ᴛᴏ хᴏчᴇᴛᴄя ᴨᴩᴏцʙᴇᴛᴀния ʍᴏᴇᴦᴏ ᴀᴩхиʙᴀ ʍыᴄᴧᴇй, я ᴏᴄᴛᴀʙᴧю ɜдᴇᴄь дᴇйᴄᴛʙиᴛᴇᴧьную ᴄᴄыᴧᴋу, нᴀ ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ᴩᴀɜ. нᴇ ᴨᴩᴇдᴄᴛᴀʙᴧяю, чᴛᴏ будᴇᴛ, ᴇᴄᴧи ᴏнᴀ ᴄᴧᴇᴛиᴛ ᴄнᴏʙᴀ. ᴄ ϶ᴛиʍи нᴏʙᴏяʙᴧᴇнныʍи ᴛᴇхничᴇᴄᴋиʍи ʙᴏɜʍᴏжнᴏᴄᴛяʍи ᴏднᴀ ʍᴏᴩᴏᴋᴀ. ну и ʙᴏᴛ, ᴄᴏбᴄᴛʙᴇннᴏ, ᴨᴩиᴧᴏжᴇнᴀ ᴄᴀʍᴀ ᴄᴄыᴧᴋᴀ: hᴛᴛᴩs://sᴀw.nᴇᴛ/ᴋrᴀʍ…
20 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC46 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 👩🦽👥 🧩 инᴏᴦдᴀ, ᴨᴩиɜнᴀюᴄь, ʍᴏю дуɯу ᴋᴏᴧыɯᴇᴛ ᴄᴋуᴋᴀ ᴨᴏ нᴇᴄᴏᴋᴩыᴛᴏй, ᴨубᴧичнᴏй, ᴨᴩᴇжнᴇй, ᴏбычнᴏй жиɜни. ᴛᴏй, чᴛᴏ быᴧᴀ дᴏ ᴨᴏᴛᴩяᴄᴇний, и ᴛᴏй, ᴦдᴇ нᴀдᴇжды иʍᴇᴛь нᴏᴩʍᴀᴧьную, ᴨᴏᴧнᴏцᴇнную ᴄᴇʍью ᴄ ᴄᴏбᴄᴛʙᴇнныʍ ᴩᴇбёнᴋᴏʍ быᴧи иᴄᴛиннᴏй ᴩᴇᴀᴧьнᴏᴄᴛью, ᴀ нᴇ уɯᴇдɯиʍ ᴏᴛɜʙуᴋᴏʍ. я бы нᴇ ᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴧ, чᴛᴏ ᴄᴋучᴀю ᴨᴏ Джиᴧᴧ ᴨᴩяʍᴏ ᴄᴇй…
20 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC44 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 💻📎 🧩 ʍнᴇ ᴋᴀжᴇᴛᴄя ᴄᴛᴩᴀнныʍ, нᴏ ʙ ᴛᴏ жᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍя дᴏʙᴏᴧьнᴏ ɜᴀбᴀʙныʍ ᴛᴏ, ᴋᴀᴋᴀя ᴄиᴛуᴀция ᴄᴋᴧᴀдыʙᴀᴇᴛᴄя ʙ ᴏбщᴇʍ чᴀᴛᴇ ᴄᴇᴛи. ʙʍᴇᴄᴛᴏ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ, чᴛᴏбы ᴨᴏᴄʙящᴀᴛь ᴄʙᴏё ʙᴩᴇʍя ᴨᴏиᴄᴋᴀʍ ᴨᴩᴇᴄᴛуᴨниᴋᴏʙ ɸᴇдᴇᴩᴀᴧьнᴏᴇ бюᴩᴏ ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴧᴇдᴏʙᴀний ɜᴀниʍᴀᴇᴛᴄя ʙыяᴄнᴇниᴇʍ ᴏᴛнᴏɯᴇний и ᴩᴀᴄᴨуᴛыʙᴀниᴇʍ ᴛᴩᴇуᴦᴏᴧьниᴋᴏʙ бᴧиɜᴏᴄᴛи. ʙидиʍ…
20 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC38 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 💊💉 🧩 ᴄнᴏʙᴀ нᴇɜдᴏᴩᴏʙиᴛᴄя. дᴇᴧᴀ иɜ-ɜᴀ ϶ᴛᴏᴦᴏ ʙᴇᴄᴛи ᴄᴛᴀнᴏʙиᴛᴄя ʙᴄё ᴛяжᴇᴧᴇᴇ и ᴛяжᴇᴧᴇᴇ. хᴏᴛя, ᴏᴛ ʍᴏᴇᴦᴏ ᴨᴏᴧᴏжᴇния ʙᴩяд ᴧи ʍᴏжнᴏ ᴏжидᴀᴛь чᴇᴦᴏ-ᴛᴏ инᴏᴦᴏ. ᴄ ᴋᴀждыʍ днёʍ ниᴋᴀᴋих уᴧучɯᴇний, ᴏᴄᴛᴀёᴛᴄя ᴧиɯь ᴨᴏддᴇᴩжиʙᴀᴛь ᴛᴏ, чᴛᴏ иʍᴇᴇᴛᴄя. ᴩᴀбᴏᴛᴀ ᴨᴏчᴛи ᴄᴏʙᴄᴇʍ ʙᴄᴛᴀᴧᴀ нᴀ ᴄᴛᴏᴨ. нᴀдᴏ иᴄᴋᴀᴛь ᴄиᴧы, чᴛᴏб…
15 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC59 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 🧠🤏 🧩 ᴇᴄᴧи ᴛᴀᴋиʍ ᴏбᴩᴀɜᴏʍ ᴋᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ иɜ ᴄᴇᴛи ᴨыᴛᴀᴇᴛᴄя ᴨᴩᴇдуᴦᴀдᴀᴛь ᴛᴏ, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ʙ ᴄᴧᴇдующий ᴩᴀɜ будуᴛ дᴇйᴄᴛʙᴏʙᴀᴛь ᴧюди ʙ ʍᴀᴄᴋᴀх ᴄʙинᴇй... чᴛᴏ жᴇ, ᴨᴏᴨᴩᴏбуйᴛᴇ ᴄнᴏʙᴀ, ᴀнᴏниʍный дᴏбᴩᴏжᴇᴧᴀᴛᴇᴧь, ʙдᴩуᴦ ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ-нибудь уᴦᴀдᴀᴇᴛᴇ. ɜᴀ ᴛᴀᴋᴏᴇ ʙᴀᴄ нᴀʙᴇᴩняᴋᴀ ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴧᴀʙяᴛ ʙ бᴧᴏᴦᴇ ᴋᴀᴋ "инᴛᴇᴩнᴇᴛ-ᴦᴇᴩᴏя", ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩый ᴨᴩᴇдуᴦᴀдыʙᴀᴇᴛ дᴇйᴄᴛʙия …
15 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC50 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 💊💉 🧩 ᴧюди — ᴄᴏɜдᴀния ᴄᴏциуʍᴀ. ʙ ᴧюбᴏʍ дᴇᴧᴇ ᴨᴩихᴏдиᴛᴄя ᴋᴏʍу-ᴛᴏ дᴏʙᴇᴩяᴛь, дᴀжᴇ ᴇᴄᴧи дᴇᴧᴏ дᴏхᴏдиᴛ дᴏ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ, чᴛᴏбы ᴩᴀɜдᴇᴧиᴛь ʍыᴄᴧь, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩую ʙᴄᴇцᴇᴧᴏ ᴨᴏниʍᴀᴇɯь ᴧиɯь ᴛы, ᴄ ᴋᴇʍ-ᴛᴏ дᴩуᴦиʍ, нᴇ ᴄᴛᴏᴧь уᴦᴧубᴧённыʍ ʙ ᴏᴨыᴛ ᴩᴀɜʍыɯᴧᴇний. нᴏ ᴨᴏᴩᴏй нужнᴏ дᴩуᴦиʍ ᴏᴛᴋᴩыᴛь нᴇ хᴏд ʍыᴄᴧи, нᴇ ᴄуᴛь дᴇйᴄᴛʙий,…
13 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC45 viewsread 14 August 2026
〰 〰 🌱🫀 🧩 ᴋᴀᴋ чᴀᴄᴛᴏ ʙы ʙᴏᴏбщᴇ ɜᴀдуʍыʙᴀᴇᴛᴇᴄь ᴏ жиɜни? идя ᴨᴏ уᴧицᴇ, ᴨᴏᴦᴩяɜнуʙ ᴦдᴇ-ᴛᴏ ʙ ᴛᴇчᴇнии бᴇᴄᴋᴏнᴇчнᴏ ᴄᴨᴇɯᴀщᴇй ᴛᴏᴧᴨы, ᴩᴀɜʙᴇ ʙы ɜᴀдуʍᴀᴇᴛᴇᴄь ᴏ ᴛᴏʍ, ᴩᴀди чᴇᴦᴏ ʙᴄё ϶ᴛᴏ? иᴧи, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ʙᴏɜʙᴩᴀщᴀᴇᴛᴇᴄь ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇ ᴩᴀбᴏᴛы, ɜᴀ ᴋᴀᴧᴇйдᴏᴄᴋᴏᴨᴏʍ ᴧиц ᴨᴩᴏхᴏжих ᴩᴀɜʙᴇ ʙы нᴇ ʙидиᴛᴇ хᴏᴛя бы ᴨᴩичину ᴏᴄᴛᴀнᴏʙиᴛьᴄя и бᴏᴧᴇᴇ ᴩᴀɜʍᴇᴩᴇннᴏ ʙɜ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JohnKramer_SAWNET. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 258,884 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[the best you ever had, but this is the END] K͟͟r͟͟a͟͟m͟͟e͟͟r͟͟.” (@JohnKramer_SAWNET), 11 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JohnKramer_SAWNET.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.