Channel
@JinYanBi_SVIP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
126subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001781840829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JinYanBi_SVIP |
| Description | 专至于发现挖机潜力币，分享土狗，挖掘金狗 入坑有风险，投资需谨慎，皆不具投资建议 仅供参考 DMTG：https://t.me/JinYanBi69 金研交流包厢：https://t.me/JinYanBi_VIP888 TW:https://twitter.com/JinYanBi 查合约专用群（不交流）：https://t.me/JinYanBi_CA |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JinYanBi_SVIP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 126 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 57.1% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2023 to 30 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
$BTC 0xb5ea574dd8f2b735424dfc8c4e16760fc44a931b 随便玩玩
高点6x 我出晚了也小赚
0xc542d8fcac85d94d71838f6a97ff4977c765ba3e 彩票 1.Pepe官网做0x69这么准确定位的图，比较少有(亮) 2.但Pepe官推没关注#0x69推特(暗) 3.阿北细看两官网代码，官网字体一致，但代码的开发习惯差别很大，0x69官网图片链接命名喜欢用002.png 类似的。不同DEV？ 北斗鹰 热度较久了
❤1👍1
因为设备问题停更了一天，抱歉兄弟们，没啥好狗，接下来间断打狗
#FROG 离谱 60e预售 3分钟打完了
👍2
【JINNYAN 】节目单 🛎 ⏰|日期2023-08-29（UTC+8） 🔹| TBA | 发射|1/1| MONK 🔹| 18:00 | 发射|2/2| DadyShib 🔹| 23:00 | 发射|1/1| OnlyFrens 🔹| 24:00 | 发射|1/1| MARIO 🔹| 24:30 | 发射|0/4| CMCTools 🔹| 01:00 | 发射|4/4| BlockBot 🔹| 02:00 | 发射|5/5| ChartAI 🔹| 02:00 | 发射|0/0| Dalmatian 🔹| 07:00 | 发射|1/15| POP
👍1
0x37fcf91f9a01515fe36260690d5542b1fbf853dc 有跌没风险，没啥好狗可以晚点看看
👎1
$PEPE3 0x75d23a0d987c55337b99491536fa58b1f2c461da 彩票 https://t.me/Pepe3Ethereum https://twitter.com/Pepe3ethereum
❤1
$PEPE2.69 #PEPE2.69 0xb194574195dfa41e82ef1b7f1b2c895139233d00 https://twitter.com/PEPE269ERC https://t.me/PEPE269eth https://pepe269.com 人气很高，研究研究，当个彩票
开盘就看到，等了半年也没见放权，看着越走越高，服了😅 不建议再去追高了
0x17cb7e814a0306a837b5de80cb3d8a4f521e019a 锁了200年 没放权限，几个聪明钱包买入后拉起来的，先看看，风险很大 https://t.me/PEEPA_ERC20 https://twitter.com/PEEPAERC20 https://wifeofpepe.fun/
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JinYanBi_SVIP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JinYanBi_SVIP named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JinYan 金狗日报🔔” (@JinYanBi_SVIP), 126 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JinYanBi_SVIP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.