本人只有一个飞机号最近有人冒充大家注意本人只有这一个飞机号 @JettaSMS
Signed JettaSMS

Channel
@JettaSMS6
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
424subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002087380226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JettaSMS6 |
| Description | 客服:@JettaSMS 荷兰 波兰 芬兰 瑞士 英国 瑞典 美国 加拿大 立陶宛 以色列 澳大利亚 爱沙尼亚 波多黎各 目前我们平台集聚很多国家 都可注册WS 后续会开放更多国家。 上述所有国家都可以接收短信。 All of the above countri |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JettaSMS6 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 424 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 424 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 426 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 865 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
本人只有一个飞机号最近有人冒充大家注意本人只有这一个飞机号 @JettaSMS
Signed JettaSMS
巴西有需要对接的老板来
Signed JettaSMS
售后的已经做的差不多了,新号码可以继续用了 之前出现这情况 不好意思。 我们以后不会出现这情况了。感谢新老客户的信任
❤1
Signed JettaSMS
今天有点事 回复不及时
❤1
Signed JettaSMS
大家可以把需要复接的号码发我下,看看10天后能否在购买回来。
❤1
Signed JettaSMS
现在 在开号码回复不及时
Signed JettaSMS
大家可以把没有封的,进行换绑一下,需要复接解封的号码发给我,我们10天左右看看能再次购买回来不。
Signed JettaSMS
还有就是 你们没办法接码的号码 需要复接的号码 统计下,我们尽量10天以后看看有希望把号码买过来不。
Signed JettaSMS
大家我们现在作出决定 以澳大利亚为例,只要是号码没办法接码,没办法复接,我们以双倍的号码给大家进行赔付,你拿300个赔您600个澳大利亚号码,相信给我们合作的老客户相信我们。真是这一次更新给大家带来不好的体验。
Signed JettaSMS
大家把没办法接码的号码 给我下做成文本标注多少。我们开始看下到底是哪些号码出得问题。
Signed JettaSMS
大家请放心 我们已经申请号码了,到时候会给大家做售后
Signed JettaSMS
大家不要急。你们一急我这边忙不过来。不好意思 大家理解下 一次大维护
Signed JettaSMS
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JettaSMS6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 915,107 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jetta 国际SMS” (@JettaSMS6), 424 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JettaSMS6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.