Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jennys Nachrichtenkanal

Channel

Jennys Nachrichtenkanal

@Jennysnachrichten

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001758144096
TypeChannel
Username@Jennysnachrichten
DescriptionIch wollte nie ein Nachrichtenkanal sein, aber nun mache ich doch einen Extra-Kanal auf, in dem ich die m. E. wichtigen oder interessanten Nachrichten verbreite und vermutlich auch kurz kommentiere. Es ist nur zur Info, daher keine Kommentarfunktion.
Created22 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Jennysnachrichten

Growth

727 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:4672no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:1672first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
375.7%
avg views ÷ 72 subscribers
Avg views / post
271
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 January 20266 August 2026)
Views total541
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27
Videos
60
Links
159

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Soll ich diese Meldungen (siehe Beschreibung) künftig hierher schicken?

  1. Ja90%
  2. Nein10%
  3. Egal0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC523 viewsread 9 August 2026

So langsam wird es bei den Altparteien Mode, möglicherweise erfolgreiche Opponenten bei Wahlen auszuschließen, sich die Konkurrenz also vom Hals zu schaffen, weil man gerade noch die Macht dazu hat. Wir haben es schon bei einigen Bürgermeisterwahlen erlebt und nun wird Martin Siechert mit fadenscheinigen Begründungen von der Kandidatur zur Landratswahl in Niedersachsen ausgeschlossen - ihm wird hauptsächlich zur Last

26 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @CraziiWorld

An alle Kriegstreiber und Unruhestifter ❗️ ⚠️PRÄSIDENT PUTINS BOTSCHAFT AN DIE DEUTSCHE REGIERUNG UND DAS DEUTSCHE VOLK So wird der Gnadenstoß versetzt – ohne Waffen, verbal… 🥳 „Wir wollen euch nicht angreifen! Warum sollten wir? Diese Zeiten sind längst vorbei! Jeder, der noch bei Verstand ist und klar denken kann, versteht das. 🔸Erstens: Ihr habt bereits Staatsschulden in Höhe von 2,5 Billionen Euro, und kein s

26 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dazu muß ich wohl nichts mehr sagen ... Meinem eigenen Ratschlag folgend, den ich heute auf meinem Hauptkanal gegeben habe, denke ich darüber nach, eine Party zu veranstalten. Das ist unter den gegebenen Umständen wohl das Beste, was man tun kann.⬇️⬇️⬇️

22 Jun 2026, 09:42 UTC607 viewsread 9 August 2026

Man darf hoffen .... wenn das alles so stimmt, erklärt das einerseits Trumps Bereitschaft, den Iran zu besänftigen und bedeutet auf der anderen Seite, das weder die USA noch die europäischen Streitkräfte fähig sind, einen Krieg zu führen. Im Hinblick auf meine gerade veröffentlichen Überlegungen wird die europäische Kriegstreiberei noch absurder und die in den KSM (Kloschüsselmedien) auftretenden "Experten" machen s

21 May 2026, 08:41 UTC587 viewsread 9 August 2026

Mal wieder läßt der Überwachungsstaat grüßen ... und mal wieder natürlich nur zu unserer Sicherheit *höhnisches Grinsen*. Nun ja, für mich kommen schon seit langer Zeit sowieso nur Fahrzeuge bis maximal ca. 2005 in Frage. Ungefähr ab der Zeit wurde in Fahrzeugen bereits teilweise Software eingebaut, mit der man sie aus der Ferne abschalten kann. Ich habe entschieden etwas dagegen, wenn irgendwer sich in meinen Vera

16 Apr 2026, 05:45 UTC58 viewsread 9 August 2026

.... und wahrscheinlich werden wieder fast alle mitmachen. Ist ja nur eine Alterkontrolle, ich habe ja nichts zu verbergen - jaja, immer dieselbe Leier, die uns immer weiter in das virtuelle und dann auch physische Gefängnis zieht. Die totale Unterwerfung unter das unmenschliche System, auf das ich in meinem Hauptkanal gerade ein Schlaglicht geworfen habe, wird dieses Mal mit "Kinderschutz" begründet. Angesichts der

9 Apr 2026, 17:53 UTC66 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ein langer aber ungemein informativer Artikel, der versucht zu erklären, welchen Sinn, der kollektive scheinbare Wahnsinn vieler Regierungen haben könnte. Er bezieht sich auf Rußland und seine immer irrer werdenden Gesetze und die zunehmende Verbieteritis der Regierung, aber dieselben Symptome sehen wir überall in der westlichen Welt, auch und gerade bei uns. Das Resümee am Ende, natürlich eine Verschwörungstheorie,

25 Mar 2026, 18:21 UTC67 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ein äußerst interessanter Artikel, was die Kriegsziele im Iran angeht. Das die offiziellen Begründungen für den Krieg dummes Zeug sind, wissen wir glaube ich alle. Es geht weder um die "armen Demonstranten" noch um die angeblichen Atomwaffen. Was der Autor hier ausführt, ist durchaus nachvollziehbar. Öl ist ja nicht nur Treibstoff, sondern auch unentbehrlich für viele andere Produkte, wie z.B. Düngemittel, Verpackun

7 Mar 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ei der Daus … ein BARGELD- und GOLD-Transport in die Ukraine. Da fragt man sich doch, wo kommt das denn her? Von der österreichischen Bank, klar, aber wo hat die es herbekommen? Wer ist der Auftraggeber, der der bankrotten Ukraine heimlich Schwarzgeld zustecken will? Es kann kein legaler Transfer sein, denn sonst hätte man das Geld auch einfach überweisen können. Es wird von ukrainischer Seite behauptet, „Der Transp

3 Mar 2026, 22:36 UTC56 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://uncutnews.ch/michael-hudson-der-angriff-auf-iran-ist-der-wahre-beginn-des-dritten-weltkriegs/

3 Mar 2026, 22:35 UTC55 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ich fürchte das Thema Iran-Krieg wird uns noch lange begleiten. Aber die Ursachen bzw. Anfänge sollten wir dabei immer im Hinterkopf behalten. https://uncutnews.ch/der-krieg-zwischen-den-usa-und-israel-gegen-den-iran-dreht-sich-nicht-um-atomwaffen-es-geht-um-imperialismus/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Jennysnachrichten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

Soll ich diese Meldungen (siehe Beschreibung) künftig hierher schicken?

  1. Ja90%
  2. Nein10%
  3. Egal0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 381,750 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jennys Nachrichtenkanal” (@Jennysnachrichten), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jennysnachrichten.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.