Channel
@Jenas_sut
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
143subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700258863 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Jenas_sut |
| Description | ﷽ واحد زن و خانواده بسیج دانشجویی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف پیامرسان بله: https://ble.ir/jenas_sut |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Jenas_sut |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 143 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 143 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
174 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 76 | 43.7% | |
| ❤ | 74 | 42.5% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 9.20% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.575% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2023 to 28 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«دقدغه» تلاشی برای حل دغدغه های دقدهنده با حضور مدعوین ویژه: 👤 خانم زهراسادات فاطمی فارغالتحصیل برق شریف ارشد مهندسی پزشکی امیرکبیر عضو هیات مؤسسه مرکز نواوری مانا مدیر عامل مجموعه مهندسی آیه 👤 خانم دکتر مریم میرکمالی استاد دانشکده فیزیک 👤 خانم لیلا احمدی دانشجوی دکتری برق 🟣 همراه با پذیرایی 📍 کافه آبانو همکف ساختمان معارف ⏰ چهارشنبه ساعت ۱۵ 📣 ویژه ورودی های دختر ۱۴۰۲ ✔️ جهت شرکت در برنامه در این لینک ثبت نا…
❤12👍1🔥1
ما اینجا نیستیم تا نظارهگر باشیم ✍ نوشته #لیندا_صرصور 🔺 بسیاری از زنان سفیدپوست گروهمان نمیدانستند که اگر میخواهند به اندازه یک مرد حقوق بگیرند باید این موضوع را در نظر می گرفتند که زنان سیاهپوست هنوز به اندازه زنان سفیدپوست حقوق نمیگیرند؛ و زنان سرخپوست به اندازه زنان سیاهپوست حقوق نمیگیرند. 🔺 شما نمیتوانید راجع به عدالت اقتصادی سخن بگویید و حرفی از عدالت نژادی به زبان نیاورید. نمیتوانید از حقوق باروری،…
❤14👍4👎1
• جناس • pinned a photo
📻 رادیو ثمین، تقدیم میکند اپیزود چهارم: غریبهها در مترو 👣 ➖ عامل گرمایش زمین هم ما هستیم... ➖ جدی میفرمایید⁉️ ادامه دارد... رادیو ثمین؛ فرکانس سوم همکاری با رادیو ثمین #انتخابات #ثمین 🆔 @jenas_sut
🔥9👍1🥱1
رادیو ثمین؛ فرکانس سوم 📣 منتظر چهارمین شماره از رادیو پادکست ثمین باشید 👣 غریبهها در مترو ➖ عامل گرمایش زمین هم ما هستیم❗️ ➖جدی میفرمایید⁉️ #ثمین #انتخابات 🆔 @jenas_sut
🔥6
📣 فراخوان همکاری با رادیو ثمین؛ فرکانس سوم در زمینههای: 🔸 نویسندگی و ایدهپردازی 🔹 گویندگی 🔸 تدوین صدا 🔹 طراحی پوستر در صورت تمایل به همکاری در هر یک از موارد ذکر شده و یا اطلاعات بیشتر، به این آیدی پیام دهید: #ثمین 🆔 @jenas_sut
🔥9
نسوان سیاسی(بخش سوم) 🔸 با توجه به آمارهای نیسلن بوکاسکن که دادههای مربوط به صنعت نشر را ارائه میدهد، درمییابیم که مردان بعید است کتابی را که توسط یک زن نوشته شده، حتی باز کنند. از میان ۱۰ نویسنده زن پرفروش تنها ۱۹٪ خوانندگان آنها مرد و ۸۱٪ زنها هستند. اما برای ۱۰ نویسنده مرد پرفروش، ۵۵٪ از خوانندگان را مردان و ۴۵٪ را زنان تشکیل میدهند! متن کامل را میتوانید در تلگراف دنبال کنید. 🆔 @jenas_sut
👍5🔥4
• جناس • pinned a photo
📻 رادیو ثمین، تقدیم میکند اپیزود سوم: مثل من، مثل تو 🔅 به یاد شهدای حادثه تروریستی کرمان #فائزه_رحیمی #امیرحسین_افضلی ♦️ شاید هم اینگونه بود... رادیو ثمین؛ فرکانس سوم همکاری با رادیو ثمین #زنان_مقاومت #ثمین 🆔 @jenas_sut
❤17🔥3
رادیو ثمین؛ فرکانس سوم 📣 منتظر سومین شماره از رادیو پادکست ثمین باشید 🔅 مثل من، مثل تو ♦️ شاید اینگونه بود... به یاد شهدای حادثه تروریستی کرمان، #فائزه_رحیمی و #امیرحسین_افضلی ثمین؛ راوی قصههای مهجور #ثمین #زنان_مقاومت 🆔 @jenas_sut
❤16👍1
⁉️ زن چیست؟ #گزارش_تصویری 💠 غرفه روز #زن بسیج دانشجویی 🆔 @jenas_sut
🔥13👍1👎1
مرگ بر فمینیسم اسلامی! برابری، تساوی، عدالت جنسیتی واژگانی آشنا و بحثبرانگیز که شاید اغلب موجب حرکت شاخکهای خیلیها شدهاند! زمانی که از برابری جنسیتی صحبت میشود، حتی گاه این خود زنان هستند که نمیخواهند آن را بپذیرند و با توجیهاتی از قبیل: زنان با مردان متفاوتند! آن را از سر خود وا میکنند؛ اما واقعیت چیست؟ آیا اصلا منظور از برابری، همان هست که میپنداریم؟ همان که چون یکی از پس کار در معدن بر میآید، پس دیگری …
🔥16👍2👎1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Jenas_sut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,119,875 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Jenas_sut named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• جناس •” (@Jenas_sut), 143 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jenas_sut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.