Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@@ ≤.. 𝗝ЖЭ͟͟Л͟͟ЛЕ𝗥И 🧩 」 ## TRUE ИТЗU

@Jellery_cover

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002496016590
TypeChannel
Username@Jellery_cover
Descriptionvery soon . . 🦠 prods : scara,aily,keri,layusti,kiki
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 5 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Jellery_cover

Growth

1612 Aug 2026, 21:18 — 16 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:31 — 16 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:1812 Aug 2026, 21:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–17 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:3116no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:1816first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
13
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 26s
Average length
5m 26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊2822.0%
💘2721.3%
🎄1915.0%
🦄1411.0%
custom 5203982718878102067118.66%
🍾97.09%
custom 520419207705894732175.51%
custom 539119598821389838864.72%
custom 539309258564227032564.72%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 28 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Jellery_cover. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2025 to 28 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2025, 11:14 UTC447 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

😊 ۫۫. . ۫( 🔠3W💠۫🤩0V🔡R ! ≥۫ 🤩 S1NGING— ִ𝆬ׄ᷼RAYA🔠A 𖥻SEXY ㅤ! ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ . . 😊🤩WENTY ITZY🦋𓈃#O:38 ㅤ. . % JELLERY 1$ PR🔡TTY ! ۶ৎ 😯this mile yours ! #prct𝅄 🎀@ #🤩RACTICE #JELLY🕷️ 🔣 @jellery_cover . . ⭐️ 𝅄۫ 𓈒

🍾4🦄4🎄3💘3🕊2

25 Jan 2025, 21:25 UTC415 views19 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

😊 ۫۫. . ۫( 🔠3W💠۫🤩0V🔡R ! ≥۫ 🤩 S1NGING— ִ𝆬ׄ᷼AI🔠Y 𖥻SEXY ㅤ! ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ . . 😊🤩LUE DABU🦋𓈃#O:36 ㅤ. . % JELLERY 1$ PR🔡TTY ! ۶ৎ 😯this mile yours ! #prct𝅄 🎀@ #🤩RACTICE #JELLY🕷️ 🔣 @jellery_cover . . ⭐️ 𝅄۫ 𓈒

🕊6💘5🎄4🍾2🦄2

25 Jan 2025, 14:20 UTC336 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

scara (🌟) - ребят,я беру рест. у меня полностью пропало желание быть в ои,но я остаюсь только из за этой группы. Я беру отдых, что бы подумать и все осмыслить. группу будет продвигать айли и надеюсь, что девочки ей помогут. Rest of Scara..

💘4🎄2🕊2🦄2

11 Jan 2025, 21:32 UTC490 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🕊3🎄2

11 Jan 2025, 21:31 UTC484 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

😊 ۫۫. . ۫( 🔠3W💠۫🤩0V🔡R ! ≥۫ 🤩 S1NGING— ִ𝆬ׄ᷼AL🔠 𖥻SEXY ㅤ! ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ . . 😊🤍OCO ITZY🦋𓈃#3:O8 ㅤ. . % JELLERY 1$ PR🔡TTY ! ۶ৎ 😯this mile yours ! #prct𝅄 🎀@ #🤩RACTICE #JELLY🕷️ 🔣 @jellery_cover . . ⭐️ 𝅄۫ 𓈒

💘8custom 52039827188781020676custom 53911959882138983886custom 52041920770589473212🍾1🦄1custom 53930925856422703251

11 Jan 2025, 21:29 UTC437 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍾1🎄1💘1🕊1

7 Jan 2025, 18:56 UTC498 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @aizloiVideo

БЕЗОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬ ИЛИ НОЧНОЙ БРЕД? все скрины в комментариях* напишите свое мнение в комментариях! были ли у вас подобные инциденты? как вы отреагировали? почему я сделала это видео? потому что это не единичный случай! если у вас есть истории, где вы сталкивались с безответственностью и непрофессионализмом-буду рада прочитать ваш опыт! распространять это или нет-ваше дело. я никого не призываю к репосту! 🦌 @aiz

🕊4🦄2🎄1

6 Jan 2025, 18:30 UTC418 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🦄1

6 Jan 2025, 17:46 UTC439 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#🔤N0🔠 T🔠M🔠 💚 ((pr3ttY)) ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ 👕 rayana & = 🫦 -☣️ @С📝A🔤Ys- закрыт ??!❤️

🎄2🍾1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Jellery_cover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jan 2025, 19:36 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

чья эра LOCO ! ? 💚🩷

  1. скара5%
  2. раяна37%
  3. айли11%
  4. цумико6%
  5. миоми13%
  6. от530%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 28 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,083,116 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@@ ≤.. 𝗝ЖЭ͟͟Л͟͟ЛЕ𝗥И 🧩 」 ## TRUE ИТЗU” (@Jellery_cover), 16 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jellery_cover.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.