Channel

JaviBitcoiners 🙄😳

@JaviBitcoiners

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

193subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001720559945
Type	Channel
Username	@JaviBitcoiners
Created	Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	22 August 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/JaviBitcoiners

Growth

4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 193–195 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
22 Aug 2026, 09:08	193	-1
15 Aug 2026, 05:24	194	-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:48	195	no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:36	195	first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	41	33.9%
🔥	31	25.6%
👏	28	23.1%
❤	16	13.2%
🥴	2	1.65%
👌	1	0.826%
😢	1	0.826%
🤔	1	0.826%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.