3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 782–784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 16:16
782
-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:35
784
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:51
784
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
197.1%
avg views ÷ 782 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (11 December 2025 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
4,623
Reactions total
147
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,063 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
477
44.9%
💔
213
20.0%
❤🔥
176
16.6%
👍
122
11.5%
😢
38
3.57%
👏
37
3.48%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,063reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بردن اسم تو
آنقدر دهانم را شیرین میکند
که مورچهها بعد مرگ نامت را
از زبانم بگیرند و به لانه ببرند
میترسم بمیرم و کسی تو را نشناسد
و نداند این همه دیوانگی
در این درخت پرتقال برای که بود
نام تو، نام توست عزیزم!
غمی در حروف الفبا...
#جواد_گنجعلی
@Daar_wag
#هنررابهدستاهلشبرسانید
✅داروگ مجلهء شعر و سینمای شاعرانه✅
لبخند بزن!
در نیمکرۀ شمالی
اتفاقی بزرگ میافتد
آنگاه ستارۀ قطبی را نشان کن
و بهسمتم بیا
تا لوکوموتیوهای سنگین مسکو
سربهراهی را از یاد ببرند
بر آستانهء نفسهای تو
من
درحال فروپاشیدنم
بیپرواتر از اتحاد جماهیر شوروی
#جواد_گنجعلی
@Javadganjali1
خونم
در مجرای قلب مأیوس تو بود
تو؛ تمام آن توبههایی که شکستم
تمام درهایی که کوبیدم و باز نشدند
تمام کوچههای شلوغی که در آنها گم شدم...
بارانی بودی که چون پنجرهٔ آهن
مرا جوید و خورد
اوهامی خاکستری که در سرم پیچید
و به موها نفوذ کرد
از عشق تو
به آوارگی پناه بردم؛
چون بیماری که از شدت درد
به مرگ پناه میبرد.
#جواد_گنجعلی
از کتاب
بیتفاوتی در نور زرد
نشر نگاه ۱۴۰۰
@javadganjali1
شعر و صداى
#جواد_گنجعلى
از دفتر جدید
به همراه ترانه ى ( تک و تنها)
کلام ترانه: رضا عابدینزاده
@Daar_wag
#هنررابهدستاهلشبرسانید
✅داروگ مجلهء شعر و سینمای شاعرانه✅
.
بنیاد فرهنگی هنری هوا(هنر و ادبیات) نخستین دوره از جایزه مستقل و تخصصی کتاب سال شعر به انتخاب هنرمندان را به دبیری جواد گنجعلی برگزار میکند.
ناشران و شاعرانی که کتاب شعر در قالب سپید برای اولین بار در سال۱۴۰۳و ۱۴۰۴ چاپ نمودهاند، میتوانند نسخه pdf اثر را به دبیرخانهٔ جایزه ارسال نمایند.
✅جایزهٔ تخصصی هوا منحصرا آثار سپید و پیشرو را مورد بررسی قرار خواهد داد.
✅آثار برگزیده، در سه بخش اصلی کتاب سال، پیشنها…
صبوری نداشتم
دلم هجرت میخواست
گوشه آسمان
رد غمگین دُرنایی دیوانه را پیش گرفتم
که از زمستانی به زمستان دیگر کوچ کرد
تنها وانمود کردم از تو دور شدهام
در من،
قدم زدنهایی با تو بود
که هرگز ترکم نکردند.
#جواد_گنجعلی
@Distortedhuman
🌷هنر هشتم؛ آشفتگیهای شاعرانه🌷
هرگز برایت شعری نگفتم
اینروزها فکر میکنم به تو بدهکارم
اما با این پستچیهای سربههوا
دل شاعر که شکستنی است،
چگونه در پاکتی سالم
بهدست تو خواهد رسید؟
#جواد_گنجعلی
@Daar_wag
#هنررابهدستاهلشبرسانید
✅داروگ مجلهء شعر و سینمای شاعرانه✅
عقلم که کامل شد
به موهبت دیوانگی ایمان آوردم
خودم را ترانهای خوشبخت یافتم
که آهنگی خاطره انگیز را
به دوش میکشید
تلنگر مه بودم بر وضوح شیشه
دلو آب در درنگ چاه
پروانهای که دلش میخواست بودا شود
#جواد_گنجعلی
آواز استاد
#محمدرضا_شجریان
@Distortedhuman
🌷هنر هشتم؛ آشفتگیهای شاعرانه🌷
با تو سلامی بود
که بوی خداحافظی داشت
برف می آمد و رنج را سنگینتر میکرد
برف می آمد و میدانستم
این آدم برفی
تا چند بهار بعد آب نخواهد شد...
#جواد_گنجعلی
@Daar_wag
#هنررابهدستاهلشبرسانید
✅داروگ مجلهء شعر و سینمای شاعرانه✅
دلتنگم و آرزوی دیدنت
در دلم تیر میکشد،
با ابرِ بالای سرم
غمی است
که باران را محزون میکند
پیراهنم را بالا بزن
سینهام
صدای اسبِ شلاق خورده میدهد
آنقدر سینهسوختهام
که میتوانی
از شکاف دندههایم
رودخانهای را عبور دهی.
#جوادگنجعلی
@javadganjali1
.
درک غروب
از حوصلهٔ دیواری که تیرباران شده
خارج است
حال سرکرده یاغیان را دارم، علیمراد!
وقتی جسد هم قطارانش را
از دروازه شهر آویزان کردند.
#جواد_گنجعلی
@Daar_wag
#هنررابهدستاهلشبرسانید
✅داروگ مجلهء شعر و سینمای شاعرانه✅
نقل است که یکی از او پرسید:
چگونهای؟
گفت:
چگونه بود حال قومی که در دریا باشند و کشتی بشکند و هر کسی به تختهای بمانند.
گفت:
صعب باشد.
گفت:
حال من همچنان باشد.
#تذکرة_الاولیاء
ذکر حسن بصری
@Daar_wag
#هنررابهدستاهلشبرسانید
✅داروگ مجلهء شعر و سینمای شاعرانه✅
❤17💔6👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Javadganjali1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 97,140 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شعروصدای "جواد گنجعلی"” (@Javadganjali1), 782 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Javadganjali1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.