Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jamie’s 💎 Jewels

@JamiesJewels

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

471subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001548959971
TypeChannel
Username@JamiesJewels
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JamiesJewels

Growth

4714734727 August 2026 — 473 subscribers7 August 2026 — 473 subscribers14 August 2026 — 471 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 471–473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:55471-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:17473no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:07473first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1030.3%
👍1030.3%
🔥824.2%
🙏39.09%
😁13.03%
🥰13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Dec 2025, 22:13 UTC168 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Merry Christmas to those celebrating. 🎅🤶 happy holidays to all my OG’s

6🔥1

30 Nov 2025, 11:16 UTCviews —

Jamie’s 💎 Jewels pinned «Anyone interested in a private sale opportunity. Launching early next year? »

30 Nov 2025, 11:15 UTC225 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Anyone interested in a private sale opportunity. Launching early next year?

  1. Yes42%
  2. No13%
  3. I need to know more45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Nov 2025, 07:50 UTC229 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If anyone ever sent BnB to coinbase over years. It’s now recoverable if you didn’t know.

1

12 Nov 2025, 17:15 UTC222 viewsread 7 August 2026

What do you think sucked the life and interest out of memes and DeFi projects?

8 Sept 2025, 19:33 UTC271 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aminoupdatesPhoto

🔥 Amino x NELK Boys: App Launch & Investor Event Recap👀 We’re excited to share key highlights from a monumental weekend for Amino & WERD Labs! This past Friday, we hosted a private investor event, followed by the official launch party for the new Amino app - both held on the same day. • The investor event brought together some of our largest current investors, as well as new high-net-worth individuals eager to get

🔥3

6 Jul 2025, 20:35 UTC337 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Why is the UK so behind on crypto? Seems like anyone I speak to has no interest in it!

😁1

26 Jun 2025, 17:46 UTC352 viewsread 7 August 2026

Let’s just see if you’re following your bag. Let’s get to to minimum 100 likes https://x.com/aminoai/status/1938235987647226000

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @JamiesJewels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Nov 2025, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Anyone interested in a private sale opportunity. Launching early next year?

  1. Yes42%
  2. No13%
  3. I need to know more45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 9 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jamie’s 💎 Jewels” (@JamiesJewels), 471 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JamiesJewels.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.