Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐™…๐™–๐™ ๐™š ๐™‚๐™ฎ๐™ก๐™ก๐™š๐™ฃ๐™๐™–๐™–๐™ก ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™›๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ!

Channel

๐™…๐™–๐™ ๐™š ๐™‚๐™ฎ๐™ก๐™ก๐™š๐™ฃ๐™๐™–๐™–๐™ก ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™›๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ!

@JakeGyllenhaalConf

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

64subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002349413712
TypeChannel
Username@JakeGyllenhaalConf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JakeGyllenhaalConf

Growth

646564.514 Aug 2026, 15:02 โ€” 65 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 20:08 โ€” 64 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 15:0215 Aug 2026, 20:08
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 64โ€“65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:0864-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:0265first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค1645.7%
๐Ÿ“720.0%
๐ŸŒญ514.3%
๐Ÿ‘514.3%
๐Ÿ‘€12.86%
๐Ÿ˜‡12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC176 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ะŸั€ัƒั„ ั‡ั‚ะพ ะ”ะถะตะนะบ ะ”ะถะธะปะปะตะฝั…ะพะป ะฑั‹ะป ะฒ ะฑัะบั€ัƒะผัะต: #ั‚ะตะนะบ | @JakeGyllenhaalConf

๐Ÿ“4๐Ÿ‘3

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ะฐั€ะดะฐ ะฒั–ั–ั–ั–ั–ัƒ [๐Ÿ‘ป ๐Ÿšซ] #ILOVESTARLORD!!!

30 Jun 2026, 11:37 UTC163 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ“1

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ะฐั€ะดะฐ ะฒั–ั–ั–ั–ั–ัƒ [๐Ÿ‘ป ๐Ÿšซ] #ILOVESTARLORD!!!

27 May 2026, 15:09 UTC278 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โค1

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ะฐั€ะดะฐ ะฒั–ั–ั–ั–ั–ัƒ [๐Ÿ‘ป ๐Ÿšซ] #ILOVESTARLORD!!!

10 May 2026, 14:29 UTC332 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ะฒั‹ ะถะธะฒั‹

โค2๐ŸŒญ2

Signed ั„ะพะฝะฐั€ัŒ !ฮฑั€ั…ะธั‚ะตะบั‚ัƒั€ะฝั‹1ยฐ

10 May 2026, 14:29 UTC326 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ั‡ะพ ะดัƒะผะฐะตั‚ะต

โค2๐ŸŒญ2

Signed ั„ะพะฝะฐั€ัŒ !ฮฑั€ั…ะธั‚ะตะบั‚ัƒั€ะฝั‹1ยฐ

10 May 2026, 14:26 UTC319 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

ะฟั€ #ั‚ะตะนะบ | @JakeGyllenhaalConf

โค1๐ŸŒญ1

Signed ั„ะพะฝะฐั€ัŒ !ฮฑั€ั…ะธั‚ะตะบั‚ัƒั€ะฝั‹1ยฐ

10 May 2026, 07:42 UTC266 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โค2

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ะฐั€ะดะฐ ะฒั–ั–ั–ั–ั–ัƒ [๐Ÿ‘ป ๐Ÿšซ] #ILOVESTARLORD!!!

10 Apr 2026, 07:44 UTC330 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ“1

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ะฐั€ะดะฐ ะฒั–ั–ั–ั–ั–ัƒ [๐Ÿ‘ป ๐Ÿšซ] #ILOVEDJO!!! #peterquill

10 Apr 2026, 06:58 UTC307 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ะŸั€

๐Ÿ“1

Signed ั„ะพะฝะฐั€ัŒ !ฮฑั€ั…ะธั‚ะตะบั‚ัƒั€ะฝั‹1ยฐ

28 Feb 2026, 16:07 UTC388 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

ะผะพะน ะปัŽะฑะธะผั‹ะน ะดะฐะฝั ั‚ั‘ะผะฝั‹ะน ั‚ะณะบ: @heieiwoa ั‚ั‚: jer4lussh ะฝะตะฐะฝะพะฝ ะดะถะตั€ะตะผะธ #ั‚ะตะนะบ

โค1

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ัƒัˆะฐั€ะฐ ะั‚ะปะฐั ะฑะถั–ั–ะบโฝแดฌโฟสธ แต–สณโฟหขโพ [๐Ÿฉธ๐Ÿšฒ] #ILOVEDJO!!! #peterquill

22 Feb 2026, 13:24 UTC339 viewsread 14 August 2026

ะงัƒั‚ ั‡ัƒั‚๐Ÿค๐Ÿค

Signed ะŸั–ั‚ัƒัˆะฐั€ะฐ ะั‚ะปะฐั ะฑะถั–ั–ะบโฝแดฌโฟสธ แต–สณโฟหขโพ [๐Ÿฉธ๐Ÿšฒ] #ILOVEDJO!!! #peterquill

22 Feb 2026, 08:51 UTC323 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ะฐะฒั‹ะถะธะฒั‹ ั‚ะพ ะธะปะธ ะฝะต...

๐Ÿ‘€1

Signed ั„ะพะฝะฐั€ัŒ !ฮฑั€ั…ะธั‚ะตะบั‚ัƒั€ะฝั‹ะนยฐ

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @JakeGyllenhaalConf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,398,562 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐™…๐™–๐™ ๐™š ๐™‚๐™ฎ๐™ก๐™ก๐™š๐™ฃ๐™๐™–๐™–๐™ก ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™›๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ!โ€ (@JakeGyllenhaalConf), 64 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JakeGyllenhaalConf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.