➡️ ⌨️💬 Ахахаха... Скиину, куда я денусь? ❤️3💬➡️0
custom 52264969202638700301custom 52266576379400867221

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003842225395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JaYc3_TaL1S_hexcom |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 2 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JaYc3_TaL1S_hexcom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 13 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 13 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
62 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5226657637940086722 | 22 | 35.5% | |
| custom 5226591701602159465 | 16 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5226496920263870030 | 10 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5309873213415640909 | 6 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5226507928265050873 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| custom 5226914769042165916 | 4 | 6.45% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 14 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
➡️ ⌨️💬 Ахахаха... Скиину, куда я денусь? ❤️3💬➡️0
custom 52264969202638700301custom 52266576379400867221
from: @GloriouSEv0lutioN_hexcom
➡️ ⌨️💬 Напомните, кто раздавал валентинки? Мне нужно задать пару вопросов. ❤️1💬➡️0
custom 52265917016021594653custom 52266576379400867222custom 52264969202638700301
Photo, posted without a caption
➡️ ⌨️💬 А что я ещё мог ожидать от Джинкс? Все равно спасибо за валентинку...... хоть и такую...... ❤️3💬➡️1
custom 52265079282650508732custom 52266576379400867222custom 53098732134156409091
From: JinX3d_Y💖[email protected]
⌨️💬 Виктор, а ты будешь писать кому-нибудь валентинки? Может, у тебя уже есть дама сердца?? ахаха👍 А если нет, то... Ты свободен 14 февраля? Мы могли бы сходить куда-нибудь вместе. Во всяких кафешках полно скидок в день влюбленных. 💬1💬➡️0
custom 52265917016021594652custom 52266576379400867222custom 53098732134156409092
⌨️ 💬 Вчера начался сбор валентинок для почты Амура. Думаю, я получу достаточно много валентинок. Я ведь всё ещё помню взгляды девушек на трибунах, когда мы играли в баскетбол и мне пришлось снять майку. 👍 Надеюсь, подарят что-нибудь из разряда конфет или чего-нибудь такого… Хотя у меня тоже есть мысль, что написать... И кому. Звучит странно. Я ещё подумаю. Наверное. Интересно, он... ОНА любит шоколад? 🤐 ❤️2💬➡️
custom 52265917016021594653custom 52266576379400867222custom 52269147690421659162
⌨️💬 Ну, раз ты предлагаешь да ещё и угощаешь.... то грех отказываться! 🙂 Надеюсь, предложение всё ещё в силе, а то после тренировки с тяжёлыми нагрузками я так и не смог толком прийти в себя и ответить вовремя. 😭 Горячий чай и классический чизкейк точно приведут меня в чувства, ахаха Скинь мне попозже адрес, чтобы я знал, куда идти… И я всё-таки возьму с собой кошелёк. Поддам на чаевые. ☺️ 💬4💬➡️0
custom 52265917016021594653custom 52266576379400867222
⌨️💬 Тренировка ощущается странно после гаражного пива от Вай… Хотя, было ли это пиво вообще? Может, стоило всё-таки дома посидеть, а то меня что-то плющит..... Для контекста: Вай позвала за гаражи, чтобы культурно посидеть, а кто я такой, чтобы отказываться? А когда мне дали бутылку— всё как-то резко забылось. Я даже не помню, как домой попал… Вай, скажи, откуда ты это достала и кто вообще продал тебе такое …
custom 52266576379400867223custom 52264969202638700302
[email protected] pinned a photo
➡️ Вай, ещё одна нашлась. ❤️0 💬➡️0
custom 52265079282650508731
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JaYc3_TaL1S_hexcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 126,103 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[email protected]” (@JaYc3_TaL1S_hexcom), 13 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JaYc3_TaL1S_hexcom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.