Channel
@J_Oosthuizen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
303subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002187416610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @J_Oosthuizen |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 12 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/J_Oosthuizen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 303 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 303 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Revisiting "The Aryan Hypothesis": Critiques and Updates https://www.academia.edu/150268874/ Key Conclusions/Summaries: - 1. Ancient Israelites carried a genetic profile similar to modern Northern Europeans (this was also known from the original Aryan Hypothesis, but was further strengthened here). Genetic shifts in Iron Age 2 Lebanon (~770 BC) and early post-Israelite areas south of Tyre show a ~10% increase in N…
The Israelite Population in the Roman Province of Judaea during the 1st Century AD https://www.academia.edu/145245296/ Abstract (click to expand): This study investigates the proportion of the Israelite-descended population within the Roman province of Judaea during the 1st century AD. Using archaeological data, biblio-historical texts, and demographic modelling, the paper reconstructs long-term population traject…
Pretty much, there was no "Yamnaya invasion" of Europe.
A Eurocentric Refutation of the Kurgan Hypothesis https://www.academia.edu/145225575/ One paragraph summary (click to expand): The Kurgan Hypothesis (KH), proposing genealogical continuity from Yamnaya (3300-2700/2400 BC) through the Corded Ware Culture (CWC) (3000-2300 BC) to Bell Beaker Culture (BBC) (consolidated 2900-2800 BC), is refuted by evidence demonstrating the methodological flaw of qpAdm, which axiomat…
Posted without readable text
The Cimmero-Scythian Origin Theory for the Celto-Germanic Peoples: Novel Archaeological and Genetic Evidence. https://www.academia.edu/143678436/ Excerpt from abstract: This study re-examines prevailing paradigms regarding the origins of the Celto-Germanic peoples in light of ancient historical records, archaeology, and aDNA data, demonstrating that the Celto-Germanic peoples of Northern and Western Europe are, in…
Manuscript has been significantly updated. Previous projects (including but not limited to the effect of admixture upon phenotype in various populations, including the Afrikaner population) still under way.
The Aryan Hypothesis: a Multidisciplinary Genetic, Archaeological, Linguistic, Historical, Scriptural, and Cultural Identification of the Israelites https://www.academia.edu/127415126/ Abstract: The Israelites are an enigmatic Biblio-historical population whose origins have been the topic of much debate for millennia. The present scholarly consensus regarding the Israelites and their origin is that the Israelites …
The latter two are coming, in due course. The first of the latter two has been completed, but will be gatekept for release alongside the second. The first two are unlikely to happen any time soon unless I receive thousands of DNA samples with verified height and IQ phenotypes, which I do not foresee.
Highlights: High IQ Among the "Far-Right": The "far-right" individuals had an average Full Scale IQ of 125.7 (SD = 14.1), markedly above population averages. Contradictory to General Trends: Unlike prior findings of a negative correlation between intelligence and "right-wing" beliefs, this study found high cognitive ability among "far-right" individuals. Minimal Racial IQ Variation: Racial background did not at all…
The "Far-Right" Genius: An Investigation into the Intelligence of the "Far-Right", by Johan Oosthuizen. https://www.academia.edu/125602308/Johan_Oosthuizen_The_Far_Right_Genius_16_11_24_V PDF attached. May be subject to future updates. Highlights to follow.
Channel name was changed to «Johan Oosthuizen Research»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @J_Oosthuizen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 140,875 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Johan Oosthuizen Research” (@J_Oosthuizen), 303 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/J_Oosthuizen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.