Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for طَبطَب

Channel

طَبطَب

@J_4lIlU

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35,818subscribers

+639 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213371592
TypeChannel
Username@J_4lIlU
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/J_4lIlU

Growth

35,17936,05235,615.57 August 2026 — 35,179 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,294 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,544 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,551 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,506 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,503 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,052 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,818 subscribers35,8187 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +639. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,048–36,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:2735,818-234
13 Aug 2026, 09:2536,052+549
12 Aug 2026, 07:4235,503-3
11 Aug 2026, 08:2735,506-45
10 Aug 2026, 05:5135,551+7
9 Aug 2026, 07:5335,544+250
8 Aug 2026, 05:5335,294+115
7 Aug 2026, 17:1835,179first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.5%
avg views ÷ 35,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,800
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held18 (22 December 202526 July 2026)
Views total13,800
Reactions total1,551
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

42,321 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭8,83220.9%
🍓5,38212.7%
custom 58593335464385650432,3305.51%
custom 59993461216237392442,2305.27%
custom 52672701099566962551,9404.58%
custom 52875560393596244121,8904.47%
custom 54025880281893109121,8704.42%
custom 54498220212213673581,6803.97%
custom 58727354507198523571,6603.92%
custom 58820792164968092331,6603.92%
custom 54339757479727050381,6403.88%
custom 59089170197255346571,6403.88%
custom 52851902682937740341,6103.80%
custom 53303526139153966031,6103.80%
💘1,5113.57%
custom 53818064724453168671,4203.36%
custom 54155938806513144281,2002.84%
custom 53257883822346939788662.05%
💋7311.73%
custom 53818367304899167092850.673%
2 further kinds3340.789%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,321reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14,789
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 18 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
2,070
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @J_4lIlU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC≈13,800 views1,551 reactions1,550 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54155938806513144281,200😭209🍓142

11 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC≈29,000 views4,252 reactions1,540 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭2,910custom 58593335464385650431,120🍓222

10 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC≈25,600 views1,386 reactions1,550 Starsread 7 August 2026

أينماَ تَضعُك الحياة ، إشرق 🌟

custom 58593335464385650431,210💘96😭80

28 Jun 2026, 21:50 UTC≈34,800 views1,508 reactions1,540 Starsread 7 August 2026

بگره تصحى تلاقى ربنا باعتلك ناس عندها استعداد تعمل أي حاجه عشان تشوفك مبسوط وبس .

😭1,110custom 5381836730489916709285🍓113

21 Jun 2026, 19:05 UTC≈39,400 views1,705 reactions2,070 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53818064724453168671,420💘155😭130

8 Jun 2026, 21:52 UTC≈44,700 views1,469 reactions1,030 Starsread 7 August 2026

يوم بصحى متقبل الوضع وست أيام بصحى اسأل نفسي هيا ليه صعبه كدا

😭1,210custom 5870679750522967839156🍓103

16 May 2026, 23:45 UTC≈63,800 views2,474 reactions1,000 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 59089170197255346571,640😭695🍓139

24 Apr 2026, 13:04 UTC≈65,000 views2,467 reactions1,070 Starsread 7 August 2026

لتحّاول تعرُف گلشي مَرات '' الضّوة الزايد يعمّي ''

custom 53303526139153966031,610💘475😭382

5 Apr 2026, 23:22 UTC≈79,400 views2,813 reactions350 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

٣٠k ✨✨ .

custom 59993461216237392442,230😭327🍓256

25 Mar 2026, 21:47 UTC≈76,600 views2,012 reactions728 Starsread 7 August 2026

ياليتني وردة تكبر على شباكك، وتبتسم لها كل ما طلّ .

custom 52851902682937740341,610😭204💘198

9 Mar 2026, 17:08 UTC≈96,400 views2,074 reactions160 Starsread 7 August 2026

الي يتعافى بنفسه يرجع مو شايف إلا نفسه

custom 58727354507198523571,660😭236👻178

5 Mar 2026, 17:31 UTC≈99,200 views2,057 reactions204 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54498220212213673581,680😭200🍓177

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @J_4lIlU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 898,287 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“طَبطَب” (@J_4lIlU), 35,818 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/J_4lIlU.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.